similar to: problem with T.38 media headers

Hello, I have a problem with movistar in Mexico with a sip calls. Movistar send to me T38 and G729 in the INVITE and they say that I have to ignore T38 and use G729 in the voice call. When a fax call is made Movistar send only T38 in the INVITE. Invite example: v=0 o=GDL-BMSW-12D 19913379 19899826 IN IP4 192.168.1.2 s=sip call c=IN IP4 192.168.1.2 t=0 0 m=audio 6370 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=fmtp:18

Hello, We're trying to receive faxes on the Asterisk server, but for the time being T.38 negotiation fails. The SDP that the Asterisk reINVITE sends contains these lines: ---------------------- m=image 4968 udptl t38 a=T38FaxVersion:0 a=T38MaxBitRate:9600 a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:1400

Hi All, Excited to see mention of T.38 passthru with 1.4.0.... BUT it seems like "Emperor's New Clothes" from my perspective. As I understand it, T.38 passthru only works via a re-invite mechanism - so two T.38 devices try talking fax and request a T.38 media stream. Asterisk is now savvy enough to realise it can't do it, so opts out - "Hey Guys, I don't know

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 04:26 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > On 06/05/2017 at 06:29 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > >> > >> Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output > >> in the source code? Which functions could be interesting? I may add own > >> debug code to see why things

On 06/14/2017 at 05:53 PM Joshua Colp wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > > <snip> > >> >> I added this patch to see, if really all packages are are freed after >> they have been processed: >> >> --- b/res/res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c 2017-05-30 19:44:16.000000000 >> +0200 >> +++

Hello, We are trying to send faxes by T.38 protocol to a remote SIP proxy from a local extension. The local extension sends the INVITE, Asterisk sends the call to the Proxy the call is connected with a regular audio codec. After a few seconds the remote proxy sends an INVITE with UDPTL and the Asterisk sends it to the local extension and it's accepted, but (here the problem starts) just

Having an issue with receiving faxes, but when I pass through the fax. Currently, I receive the fax with Digium's Fax for Asterisk, store it and the initiate an outbound call to our fax server. (XMedius Fax). This works, but we would prefer to have Asterisk simply route the call directly to the fax server and take the store and forward out of the equation. When I do that, however, the

On 06/14/2017 at 10:17 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017, at 05:09 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > > <snip> > >> >> I can now say, that asterisk / pjsip seams to work *mostly* as expected. >> Just one exception - and that's the package in question, which can't be >> seen in tcpdump. >> >> I extended the above patch by adding

reliable, 40+ faxes with 5 different fax machines tested, plus an efax service. The problem is the other way, PRI inbound to fax, the call doesn't setup between the GW and Asterisk. I have the issued narrowed down to the SIP messaging between the DMG and Asterisk. The DMG invite sends to asterisk: m=audio 49016 RTP/AVP 0 101 [notice the m=audio] a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1 a=rtpmap:101

> Asterisk Project Security Advisory - ASA-2007-010 > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Product | Asterisk | > |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| > | Summary | Two stack buffer overflows in SIP

> Asterisk Project Security Advisory - ASA-2007-010 > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Product | Asterisk | > |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| > | Summary | Two stack buffer overflows in SIP

Hi there. I have the similar problem ("Digium fax - sending fax call file vs manager originate") sending faxes with Asterisk 1.6.2.6 and Digium res_fax. Receiving is OK. I use Local channel in Call file and context [fax-out] in dialplan. My setup: Asterix<-SIP (T.38)-> Cisco(MERA MSIP v.1.0.2)<-> LocalTelco<->fax machine Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 ; Linux 2.6.26-2-686

Boa Tarde Lista. I'm having problems in tramiss?o a fax using T.38. My scenario is: Asterisk 1.6.0.5 2 ATA of Intelbras 2210. ReceiveFAX in the asterisk. Unable to fax when it is a ATA to another user on the Asterisk means, if I directly between the ATA works perfectly, is a step to the ATA ReceiveFAX of Asterisk works perfect, but if I try to pass between two Branches

Hello everyone. I'm struggling to get T.38 faxing to work in Asterisk 1.6.1.13 with a SIP DID provider here in Brazil (GVT - Vox IP service). Here's my scenario: When faxes arrive by a specific DID, they are routed thru this simple macro: [macro-recebefax] exten => s,1,Set(DB(fax/count)=$[${DB(fax/count)} + 1]) exten => s,n,Set(FAXCOUNT=${DB(fax/count)}) exten =>

Hi, folks. I'm having a heck of a time trying to get outgoing T38 faxing (I don't need inbound right now) working with FFA and Gafachi. G711 faxing works (as well as can be expected over the internet), but I want the higher reliability of T38. I'm running Asterisk 10-beta1. When I drop my callfile in to make the call, I get this: -- Attempting call on SIP/18884732963 at

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > > t38modem and asterisk are using > > m=image 35622 udptl t38 > ^^^^^ > > Provider uses > > m=image 35622 UDPTL t38 > ^^^^^ > > Could this be a problem? If I'm sending internal only, it's always > lowercase. Looking at the tests we have we

Hello! unchanged asterisk crashes during udptl / t.38 negotiation with telekom - they do not support t.38 / udptl. In detail: fax client -> asterisk -> telekom -> easybell -> asterisk -> fax server Fax server sends t.38 reinvite via asterisk to easybell. Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0 Owner/Creator, Session Id (o): - 2447581897 4 IN IP4 46.17.15.23

Hello, I'm trying to send a tif file, using Fax for Asterisk and the call is executed, but when I get the reINVITE with T.38 data, the local server doesn't recognize that we have this capability and sends a 488 message. These are the logs: <--- SIP read from UDP:xxx.xxx.xxx.xx8:5060 ---> INVITE sip:1234567 at 10.0.0.3:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP

Hello List, I have been trying to setup T38 gatewaying with the following setup SIP ->Asterisk -> DAHDI TE410P with Libss7 -> TELCO I'm using asterisk Asterisk 1.8.3.2 and DAHDI Version: SVN-trunk-r9697M Echo Canceller: HWEC I'm aware there's no support for T38 gateway but I have been trying to get the patches https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13405 to work. It seems

Does anybody have T.38 faxing working with Flowroute? I am running Asterisk 1.6.2.7-rc3 with spandsp 0.0.6-pre17. I can successfully receive faxes over ulaw. I enabled T.38 with t38pt_udptl=yes in sip.conf. When I receive a fax it tries to negotiate T.38 and Flowroute sends back a Bad Request response saying I have a SIP syntax error. Flowroute support is recommending that I try again after