similar to: No Fedora Core Builds for 0.9.3+

Ok, don't flame me, I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some, but I am not one of them. Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my ISOs are a bit old, so typical yum update Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my kernel 2.6.12... Installed the SRPM package Ran rpmbuild -bp -target=i686 kernel-2.6.spec Tried to build zaptel - error; You do not

Word. I'm doing a dupe of my production server this week as a CYA. Guess what: FC2. Once I yum update to the current kernel, no more yum. There's no reason to. You may have your own reasons (publicly avaliable server, for example) but why add uncertainty to an, at best, quite uncertain process (that of creating a stable Asterisk install given random hardware, network conditions, PSTN

I just did a fresh installation of Fedora Core 4, using my home directories from FC3, including my .wine. In the FC3 environment, I had used winetools to install. I did not want to do a fresh installation of wine, just use an RPM that would work. Alas, I had to fall back to 20041201. SA 8: I installed and uninstalled wine-20050524-1fc3winehq.athlon.rpm, wine-20050310-1fc3winehq.athlon.rpm

The issue I have had with all other FC3 kernels apart from the 2.6.9 one was that the zaptel build would throw lots of warnings up. This would have the knock on of hanging the system, spinlock I think the problem was, on a modprobe -r. Lee ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep

Dear List, A few weeks ago a discussion took place regarding Fedora Core 4 and compiling R on that platform using the new version 4 of gcc and its gfortran compiler. gcc was recently updated to 4.0.1 on FC4 (4.0.1-5 in Red Hat Land) so I thought I'd give compiling R a go on my laptop which needed updating anyway. I've had trouble using the optimisation flags I used to use under FC3 with

I found that only the kernel is installed. I'd avoid 2.6.12 for now as I had problem with the zaptel driver and stay with 2.6.9. Regards Lee ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep Sent: 24 August 2005 22:33 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] fedora

What was the issue with zaptel and 2.6.12? ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Lee Archer Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:22 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] fedora core 3 kernel source - could someonethrowthe dog a bone! I

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > This is not really true. We will probably never have everything that FC > has as added features ... but CentOS-4 has several added features and we > have been out for only a 3 months (so, not required to wait a year). Oh, sorry, I should have clarified. What I meant by "wait a year" was the time from the first .0 or

On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:00 -0600, asterisk-users- request@lists.digium.com wrote: > Andy Burns wrote: > > Shoval Tomer wrote: > > > >> Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production > system? > > > > > > when I tried the X100P drivers on FC3 I had problems with udev, the > > workaround didn't work for me, maybe

I have a dual Xeon x86_64 system running Red Hat AS 4. There are no x86_64 rpms in http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/redhat/el4/ (the i386 ones are a point release behind anyway) , and the fc4 rpms have a whole web of dependencies I don't want to pull in. So I decided to build http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/redhat/SRPMS/R-2.2.1-1.fc3.src.rpm . When I ran rpmbuild. one of the

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > RHEL-4 shipped with MySQL 4.1.x (and has a 3.23.58 client to work with > older databases) ... the latest SRPMS are mysql-4.1.10a-1.RHEL4.1.src.rpm > and mysqlclient10-3.23.58-4.RHEL4.1.src.rpm. You are indeed correct (I must have been looking at the RHEL3 dir**):

I'm trying to install themes for KDE. In doing so, I came across the following web site which seems to have the themes I want as RPMs: http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/17/dept/3/idg/User+Interface_Desktop The theme I want is called "Thinkeramik", and it has the following versions, for various Red Hat builds: thinkeramik-3.2.1-1.0.el3.kde.i386.rpm RedHat EL 3

/SNIP/ On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:00 -0600, asterisk-users- request@lists.digium.com wrote: > Andy Burns wrote: > Shoval Tomer wrote: > > Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production > system? > > > when I tried the X100P drivers on FC3 I had problems with udev, the > workaround didn't work for me, maybe things have improved since ...

OS: Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) KERNEL: Linux rack1.ape 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 11 22:57:02 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux CLUSTER: 11 Linux kernels, mixed environment FC4,FC5,FC6 SAN: FC Infortrend storage, QLogic16 port FC switch, FC adapter LSI FC929X (21224,1):ocfs2_truncate_file:242 ERROR: bug expression: le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size) != i_size_read(inode)

System specs: Fedora Core 4 2.6.13-1.1532_FC4smp ATI Radeon 9200 SE P4 2.4Ghz (hyperthreading) xorg 6.8.2 Aureal Semiconductor Vortex 2 sound card Intel 82801EB chipset wine-20050524 FC3 rpm works just fine on my FC4 system. But any versions after that lockup my system when running wine. For the 200506 - 200510 versions of wine I have compiled them from scratch so I assumed it was something

It's working from the linux box and not the xp then it's not Yes I try making corrections and this probably accounts for the confusion and broken samba communication. I just never seem to be able to come up with a working working configuration. Exception: smbclient; I can mount the XP share in a directory on my Linux box or at least the last time I checked. I have to turn off the

Hi all, I hope I'm not starting a flame war. I'm installing Centos 4.2 for a mail server. I've been experimenting with, Centos before, and now wanting to put it into a real action as mail server. Can someone pls tell me the up and down between Centos and FC? I'm familiar with FC4 and some things that I like from it: 1. The available packages are abundant. Very easy to find

I had installed R from source on Fedora Core 3. Then I upgraded to Fedora Core 4, but left R alone. R worked fine, until I trued to update.packages(). Even then, many packages updated just fine, but two of them, cluster and mgcv, failed with the following error message (using cluster as an example): gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o cluster.so clara.o daisy.o dysta.o fanny.o meet.o mona.o pam.o

hi all just a quick question i have dovecot (0.99.14 yum install) running on my fc4 server to get this working, i had to downgrade from mysql 5 to fedora's mysql rpm's i really would prefer to use mysql 5, but to satisfy the dependencies, i had to go to mysql 4 now, i just want to know if there is an rpm (linux rather than specific fc4 version is fine) out there for dovecot, that i

From: Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> > I have a real problem with this thread. It seems as if, according to some, > someone can only be with or against Red Hat. Yes, that was my major complaint too. > I'm sure Red Hat has made stupid decisions, has adopted buggy software and > are responsible for some of the headaches people have had. And I'm sure > even Red Hat