similar to: Dialplan Priorities and Sort Order...

So I have a problem. A customer of mine wants a PBX, owns an office building. I want to sell him on asterisk. He has 4 tenants. I am using my asterisk box to simulate it. My asterisk box has a TDM400P card, not a PRI card. Don't know if it makes any difference. Anyway, I want to route incoming phone calls to different contexts based on the phone number being called. Here is my

>> Any thoughs? > > I'm now struggling to see how GCC justifies it. What if a different > translation-unit declared those variables in a different order? I also > can't get the same behaviour here, do you have a more complete > command-line? Ah, I see; the translation-unit that does the optimisation needs to have them as a definition (i.e. "= {0}") rather

Hi My asterisk output is: chan_sip.so => (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) Asterisk Ready. -- Registered SIP '201' at 192.168.0.55 port 33906 -- Saved useragent "X-Lite release 1011s stamp 41150" for peer 201 -- Executing [907768385144 at default:1] Dial("SIP/201-083e75c0", "ZAP/g1/907768385144|60") in new stack [Oct 4 11:54:27]

Hi, I'm trying to set a rule to dial out through multiple Zap groups so that, say, g0 is the cheaper POTS lines group and must be used first. However, if g0 is busy or disconnected then try dialing out g1. My g0 group is made up of 4 analog lines connected to a 4-FXO card. I disconnected the RJ-11 wires from the FXO card to simulate a line disconnection. So theoretically all calls should

Hi list, I added custom code to eliminate frame index references. I replace each FI reference with a subtraction from my frame pointer register (just like ebp in x86). Its result is stored in another register which is used by the load/store instructions. Nevertheless, this operation gives me redundant subs that I would like to remove after all fi references have been eliminated. For example:

Hey all, I have a situation where I have 8 lines from the phone company in a hunt group coming in to my asterisk box. These are the same lines I'm using for outgoing calls ( named g0 ). The problem arises when someone dials our number at the same time asterisk tries to put a call out on one of the zap channels in the g0 group. This has happened twice that I know of so far, once to

Hello list, I'm experimenting with a little GlusterFS cluster on debian wheezy: === snip === muzzy:~# cat /etc/debian_version wheezy/sid muzzy:~# dpkg -l | grep gluster ii glusterfs-client 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (client package) ii glusterfs-common 3.2.6-1 GlusterFS common libraries and translator modules ii glusterfs-server 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (server package) === snip

Hi, Is there a way to create trunk groups while asterisk is running. For exemple let's say that zapata.conf defines g0 as channels 1-23 I would like (while asterisk is running) define g1 as 1-10 and g1 as 10-23 Any hints appreciated. Andre Courchesne

Dear R-helpers, I am using confint() within a function, and I want to turn off the message it prints: x <- rnorm(100) y <- x^1.1+rnorm(100) nlsfit <- nls(y ~ g0*x^g1, start=list(g0=1,g1=1)) > confint(nlsfit) Waiting for profiling to be done... 2.5% 97.5% g0 0.4484198 1.143761 g1 1.0380479 2.370057 I cannot find any way to turn off 'Waiting for. .." I tried

Hi, I'm quite new to R and are stuck with the following problem. Lets say I have a column consisting of a 1 and the rest zero's, called G0. G0 <- c(1,rep(0,5)) Now what I would like to do is to generate G1 from G0, and G2 from G1 etc... Just for the simplicity, let's say I need the first entry of the column to be increased by 5 each time. How could I do this? Thanks already!

Hi, all: Recently I am debugging the DSA and want to learn how it work, and now I am checking the local datastructure analysis. I use the following command to print the graph: (gdb) p g.dump() digraph DataStructures { label="Function addG"; Node0xe1f3a0 [shape=record,shape=Mrecord,label="{ i32: MRE\n|{<g0>}}"]; Node0xe1f4d0

Dear LLVM, I was wondering if this is the right way to get TopDown DSGraph? TDDataStructures &TD = getAnalysis<TDDataStructures>(); F is some function DSGraph &dsg = TD.getDSGraph(F); I found out the DSGraph I got using this method is actually bottom up DSGraph, can you let me know why? Thanks, xiaodong

Yesterday I posted the following question (my apologies for not putting a subject line): =================question====================== Hello -- I would like to know of a more efficient way of writing the following piece of code. Thanks. options(stringsAsFactors=FALSE) orig <- c(rep('11111111',100000),rep('22222222',200000),rep('33333333'

I'm hoping someone can give me a little dialplan assistance. Here is my scenario... I currently have an AT&T T1 connected to a Nortel Optn 11. I recently purchased a Rhino system with a Rhino dual T1 card. What I want to do is insert the Rhino box between the CO and the Nortel on the T1 so I can start migrating users over to the Asterisk system in the near future. But, in the meantime, I

Dear All I have a lot of files in a directory as follows: "02-03.txt" "03-04.txt" "04-05.txt" "05-06.txt" "06-07.txt" "07-08.txt" "08-09.txt" "09-10.txt" "G0.txt" "G1.txt" "raw_ped.txt" .......................... I want to read them into different objects according

Hi Rafael, Yes, merging gv prevents linker to do garbage collection. Should it be implemented as a peephole pass? If we do it too early, the distance between GVs are not fixed yet. PS: Below is the GCC output with "extern" hidden: ldr r2, .L2 stmfd sp!, {r3, lr} .save {r3, lr} .LPIC0: add r0, pc, r2 bl _Z4initPv(PLT) ldr r1, .L2+4 .LPIC1: add r0, pc, r1 bl _Z4initPv(PLT) ldr

Hi, I''m running snv_89 on an X4150 with a CentOS-5 guest. I cannot seem to get my second network interface to work properly. I followed the virt-install instructions, and even saw the FAQ entry about adding a second network instance in the XML config. I see my second device in the guest but it''s either connected to the wrong interface or not at all. I''d like to

dear professor: thank you for your help,witn your help i develop the nomogram successfully. after that i want to do the internal validation to the model.i ues the bootpred to do it,and then i encounter problem again,just like that.(´íÎóÓÚerror to :complete.cases(x, y, wt) : ²»ÊÇËùÓеIJÎÊý¶¼Ò»Ñù³¤(the length of the augment was different)) i hope you tell me where is the mistake,and maybe i have

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:59 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Dear Tianwei, > > You can use the -analyze option to the opt tool to tell the DSA passes > to store their results in files. When you use the -analyze option, the > DSA passes will create a separate file for each function (and possible > one file to hold the globals graph). For this reason,

Dear all, I am from Saudi Arabiya and I am using digium hardware with asterisk 1.6. When I am executing following AMI originate API. Orginate start to execute extenstion without knowing of PSTN(FXO) channel is ringing. Any one can help me to resolve this issue ? Action: Originate Channel: Dahdi/g0/2923878 Context: outbound-ivr Exten: 1234 Priority: 1 ActionID: ABC45678901234567890