similar to: Dahi-tools Compilation on Ubuntu/Xen

Has anyone been able to get asterisk 1.6 running under Xen or Amazon EC2? If yes, can you share your experience please? Is it usable in a production environment? How is the sound quality? Am I likely to suffer from latency issues if the extensions are not located in the US? Any pitfall that I should be aware of? Cheers -- Aryan Ameri

Hello, I am attempting to create several plots based on "site" (~300 total) and am having trouble with the code. I simply want to create a plot using the code, plot(year, peak), for the following dataset. I would like for each site to be plotted on a separate page and the plots saved in a directory. Would a "foreach" loop work? I tried a "by" statement, but

hi i need many cheaps atas or some very cheap way to connect analogs phones to asterisk what do you recomend? i searches and only find solutions like 40 U$D (in the states, here in argentina is like 80 U$D) per phone any links or something? thanks! David -- (\__/) (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.

Ok, so yesterday it worked. Can you run this for me and mail me the output, i have a quick check. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh And https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-db-repl.sh Last, have you check for corrupted filesystem and/or file/folders? Any updates done last days? Now maybe, just maybe, and this

On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >> Hai, >> >> Sorry for the late reply. > Never mind, weekend is important ... > >> Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge >> Without the autoremove libldb1 is not removed so libldb2 can be installed. > # apt-get distupgrade

On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:29:14 +0000 Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm not familiar with the release process, but couldn't most of the > concerns raised in this thread be addressed by shipping prebuilt binaries > for these big platforms with older toolchains? That wouldn't address the cases where people use different build options (e.g.

Has anyone managed to get FF 18.0 to work on Centos 5.8? I've been hacking at it, placing a stack of .so files (from Centos 6) into a private directory, then using LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point the system to (in a shellscript that subsequently invokes ff 18) but so far I've not managed to find the right combination. I've moved over libstdc++, all or nearly all the .so files from glib2 and

Hello, I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, listing all GPOs is working: ------------------ root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} display name : Default Domain Policy path : \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} dn :

[ Initially posted in r-package-devel, now reposting here by request from Uwe; my apologies for the cross-post. ] Package status reports come in three different severities: NOTE, WARNING, and ERROR. Motivated by Brodie's nice (dependency-free) accessor function for per-maintainer status [1], I have looked into reducing the number of ERRORs. I hit a road block. Several of my packages

Hi all, I am really stumped on this problem. I googled and could not find any solution. Here is the problem. I compiled and installed glibc-2.5-20090518 in a local directory with gcc version 4.1.2. I compiled glibc-2.5 because I wanted to test glibc-2.5 on gcc first llvm-gcc. However, after I installed glibc, llvm-gcc does not work any more. It reported this error message:

Hai Stefan, What is the samba version your running now? Im now at 4.10.3 with my DC's and the command : samba-tool gpo list username Then it does show the GPO's for the user. If you on 4.10, check if these are installed : ii python3 3.5.3-1 amd64 interactive high-level object-oriented language (default python3 version) ii

Hi all, I am really stumped on this problem. I googled and could not find any solution. Here is the problem. I compiled and installed glibc-2.5-20090518 in a local directory with gcc version 4.1.2. I compiled glibc-2.5 because I wanted to test glibc-2.5 on gcc first llvm-gcc. However, after I installed glibc, llvm-gcc does not work any more. It reported this error message:

While considering statically linking against libc++ (and other runtime libraries from LLVM), I rebuilt LLVM 4.0 with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF. There are still some .so's in llvm/lib, and only one of them seems to exist exclusively as a DSO (libLTO). There's also livLLVMLTO.a, but I doubt LTO is used after linking a binary so this just looks odd to an uninformed LLVM outside and not

Am 02.12.19 um 11:43 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >>> Hai, >>> >>> Sorry for the late reply. >> Never mind, weekend is important ... >> >>> Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge >>> Without

This bug (Debian bug number 111692) occurs with filenames that have the character 0x0a in them (newline). This is how one repeats it: ming.empire.pick.ucam.org:~/ssh-test/ # [01/09/10.00:15:50] $ : bash[592] ; cat > 'x x' This is a test. ming.empire.pick.ucam.org:~/ssh-test/ # [01/09/10.00:16:17] $ : bash[593] ; scp 'x x' dorothee:ssh-test/

Right - I know you've had a discussion about the argv[0] stuff already, but I've written this simple script to simulate the (now missing) support for Debian, and was asked to send it to you... --- ssh-argv0 --- #! /bin/sh -e if [ "${0##*/}" == "ssh-argv0" ] then echo 'ssh-argv0: This script should not be run like this, see ssh-argv0(1) for details'

In that case. apt-get update apt-get remove samba winbind --autoremove apt-get dist-upgrade --autoremove apt-get install samba winbind libnss-winbind libpam-winbind tdb-tools apt-get dist-upgrade --autoremove --purge As long as you dont use --purge, everything of samba will stay on the system and you able to install the buster version. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----

On 02/12/2019 10:51, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 02.12.19 um 11:43 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >>>> Hai, >>>> >>>> Sorry for the late reply. >>> Never mind, weekend is important ... >>>

Hi, I am running CentOS 5.3. 64 bit version. I have tried updating the OS but every time I run an application I need it reports that Glibcxx_3.4.9 is missing. I tried to do a search for this but cannot find it for my system. When CentOS upgraded to 5.3 I had hoped that the new Glibcxx would have been included but it is not. Is there an easy way to update the OS to include this? You can

Hi Aaron, Duncan Thanks for the answers. >From Duncan's e-mail, I've tried to build llvm-2.6. First problem was a missing dependence on lbffi.so.4. But I've downloaded the source from redhat, compiled and passed that point. Now I have another missing dependence on GLIBCXX_3.4.9. The version in my system is 3.4.6-11. I've been looking around for a 3.4.9 rpm for redhat, could