similar to: No subject

Asterisk: 1.4.17 with sip realtime Openser 1.3.x Hi, I had this setup working fine until I try putting OpenSER in the picture as a proxy. Unauthenticated calls go to a PRI based app via a ZAP channel, calls to sip users get send to them etc. Now with a proxy in the picture asterisk asks the incoming calls for authentication "407 Proxy Authentication Required". It seems that the

And after reload ALL your phones are unreachable for 2 minutes! Imagine you have several thousands devices unreachable for 2 minutes. How much calls will fail during that time? Regards, Mindaugas Kezys Kolmisoft UAB=20 VoIP Billing Solutions e-mail: info at kolmisoft.com URL: http://www.kolmisoft.com -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com =

Hello Im using Asterisk as a SIP client of Kamailio with RTPproxy. Asterisk is behind NAT. X-Lite and SNOM phones behind NAT work fine. But when I try to connect with an Asterisk behind NAT, the Asterisk client doesn't receive sound. I already tried in 2 different NATs, with no firewalls. This is my Asterisk config: [kamailio] type=peer host=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx disallow=all allow=ulaw

Hello, I'm trying to get calls working between websocket clients and sip clients. For clients I have sip.js based clients on chrome, Zoipers and a Grandstream phone. Challenge here is I'd like to have Kamailio and rtpengine to handle the bridging between different rtp profiles but Asterisk changes them in the sdp bodies along the way. I'm using Asterisk 11.11.0. Is there a way to

help me in another issue related also to registering asterisk with another softswitch: A) If nat=yes, then I have to set canreinvite=no to be able to register, correct? B) In case of using firefly softphone, how it possible to set it to have nat=yes (at the firefly it self and not at the sip user configuration section)? As most of the sip endpoint give an option to set nat=yes and so on, how it

Works for me.... Thanks, Hristo Benev -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alexandru Oniciuc Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:29 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] R: new way of asterisk and kamailio(openser) realtime integration

Hello, I put together a new tutorial about asterisk realtime integration with kamailio (openser). This time the database used is the one of asterisk, also call routing logic is controlled by asterisk, here is the link: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.0.x-asterisk-1.6.2-astdb Practically is an easier way to scale starting from existing asterisk installations. The other

http://vuc.me Kamailio, Open SER and Asterisk walk into a bar... The bartender is Alex Balashov, someone whose posts I have long admired on this list. Alex has agreed to take us through the following areas: - Relationship of Kamailio to OpenSER project history. - What is Kamailio/OpenSER? - SIP proxy - SIP server (for certain purposes, such as registrar, presence user agent, etc.) -

I am experiencing a "606 not Acceptable" error trying to set up an Asterisk server as an ekiga.net client. My server is behind a firewall with NAT routing. I have googled this problem and read about Asterisk feeding its local ip address to ekiga.net. That seems to be my problem. I tried putting stunaddr=stun.ekiga.net into the sip.conf file under [ekiga]. I also tried

One of the above is frequently used to front-end Asterisk. I used OpenSER to front-end a farm of Asterisk servers and was very happy with it. The ability to take a box out of service or to route a specific DNIS to a box for testing rocks. Since OpenSER has died (I don't care about the politics/personalities/trademarks), Kamailio and OpenSIPS have risen from the ashes. What are you using?

Friends, I would like to congratulate kamailio.org - a project we're cooperating a lot with. They have just been awarded the BOSSIE award by InfoWorld. Kamailio is the OpenSER SIP proxy project with a new name, a product widely used in Asterisk installations. And of course, the motivation mentions Asterisk :-) From InfoWorld site: "Award winners in network and network

Greetings, As a developer and consultant who spends considerable time on projects involving the fusion of Asterisk and products derived from the SER ecosystem (OpenSER, Kamailio, OpenSIPS, the new SIP-Router), I have found that there is a great volume of interest in this topic on the mailing lists associated with all communities involved, but a comparative lack of focus that results in

Greetings, I've noticed a problem that might originate from my Asterisk configuration, could use a hand in sorting it out. Problem is a 488 response from Asterisk whenever it gets RTP/SAVPF profile in the SDP. My current setup has Asterisk Kamailio realtime integration, and Kamailio uses dispatcher to route calls for Asterisk to handle. Now I have only one Asterisk, on the same machine as

Hello, I'd appreciate your comments on the following problem I'm having, please forgive me if this is something obvious, I've been scratching my head on this for a while: I have Asterisk+Kamailio setup where I'm currently testing inbound calls from outside. I have both webrtc and sip clients, where webrtc peers are defined according to sip.js instructions (

Hi I have an installation based on Daniel-Constantin Mierla's excellent Kamailio 3.3 / Asterisk 10 Realtime document ( http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb) but have come across an issue which is a potential problem. In this installation all SIP clients register with Kamailio, and the registrations are forwarded to Asterisk. This means that all

Hi, does anybody know if asterisk can authenticate on a NOTIFY send to a peer. I use OpenSER as SIP-Proxy and asterisk as voicemail system with ODBC Support for voicemail-messages, voicemail-users and sip-peers/users. My SIP-Users register with OpenSER. Asterisk has two views on the OpenSER database for voicemail-users and sip-peers. Call-Routing, leaving voicemail-messages in database an MWI

I'm starting a new project similar to a previous project where I used OpenSER to front a bunch of Asterisk servers. Now that OpenSER is gone, OpenSIPS and Kamailio seem the likely candidates. I'm leaning towards OpenSIPS because it's in EPEL so I can install it with yum. Also, because I think the name sounds more 'professional' when discussing architecture with clients :)

use depending on what the subnet mask is. The output provided shows two possible networks: 172.31.253.0/24 and 172.31.254.0/24. Or is this all part of the same address space with a different mask? If it is all the same space, then is the asterisk server network stack properly configured with a proper subnet mask? The bb can reach the asterisk server because it registers. Hope this helps On

I have the following setup: - UAs registered with SER/OpenSER - SIP peers (non cached), extensions, voicemail setup (not message storage) defined in Asterisk 1.2 using Realtime When a message is left in the user's mailbox, no Notify message is sent to SER. 1. If the SIP peer is defined in sip.conf with a host=ser.domain.com then the notfy is sent to SER. 2. If realtimecache=yes is set in

Scott, thank you four your reply. I had already though about both options, but the problem is, that after an ip change AND a new registration the ip address of the peer is not updated automatically. INVITES are answered with 401. Only after a sip reload the peer works again. That can't be normal... Daniel > Am 31.03.2015 um 22:45 schrieb Scott Griepentrog <sgriepentrog at