similar to: sched.c:220 ast_sched_add_variable: Scheduled event in 0 ms?

Relatively new to Asterisk and SIP and am trying to run a proof of concept using Asterisk to make an outbound call through an Audiocodes gateway via SIP using Asterisk version 1.6.1.12. The specific requirements of the gateway in the configuration I am trying to use specify that the Name part of the From header be blank with the outbound number that needs to be dialed in the number field of

Hello I recently have got my setup up and running. I am using 2 x100p cards in a Dell 400SC. I get static (inbound and outbound) within the first 20 seconds on one card, but on the other card it is crystal clear all the time. They both have their own irq and I have tried to remedy the problem by doing a hdparm found in the wiki, but still nothing. I've tried rxgain and txgain, but that

Hello, I'm build system with two director/proxy and dual stack network (or IPv6-only local services) http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director say "This also means that a single director ring must use either IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, but not both at the same time." OK All servers have 2 interface (public and local network), and all dual stack IPv4/IPv6, imap/pop (mail) and lmtp (mx) proxy run

Hi All, A long time ago I posted about an issue where calls on one of our Asterisk boxes were being dropped in Voicemail (and only in voicemail) after about 20 seconds with the error logged "[Jan 19 14:33:26] WARNING[27458]: chan_sip.c:1980 retrans_pkt: Hanging up call 001d45b6-1d490088-46ef7ed6-adbeb875 at 10.2.0.203 - no reply to our critical packet (see doc/sip-retransmit.txt).". I

Mips invokes the post-RA scheduler only when OptLevel > Aggressive, so you will have to compile with -O3. You can also invoke the MI (pre-RA) scheduler with llc option "-enable-misched". As you have pointed out, the post-isel scheduler is mandatory, and therefore you don't have to give any command line options. Currently, mips has only one generic scheduling itinerary model in

Hi, LLVM, I found LLVM codegen has 3 passes for instruction scheduling: 1) pre-ra sched 2) post-ra sched 3) mi sched. for RISC machines, there are data hazard cases appear only after Register Allocation(RA). for example, $t0 is used immediately after writing(RAW): ld $t0, MEM add $t2, $t0, $0 There may be one or more stall in pipeline. Instruction scheduler can detect this kinds of conflict

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Liu Xin <navy.xliu at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Akira, > > I found you maintain mips MipsSchedule.td. does it correct? in > MipsSchedule.td, every InstrItinData only uses one InstrStage. there's no > ByPass info out there. > are you sure this reflects the real R4xxx/R5xxx processors. > > why IILoad uses funcition unit ALU? >

Hi, Akira, I found you maintain mips MipsSchedule.td. does it correct? in MipsSchedule.td, every InstrItinData only uses one InstrStage. there's no ByPass info out there. are you sure this reflects the real R4xxx/R5xxx processors. why IILoad uses funcition unit ALU? InstrItinData<IILoad , [InstrStage<3, [ALU]>]> for my previous question, I have new input after

Akira, Thanks you for response. I understand Post-RA schedule make uses of scoreboardHazardRecognizer. But I found mips codes are good enough by default. basically, I can not easily eyeball any bubbles. I don't understand how they can do that without post-RA-sched. pre-ra-scheduler eg. (SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp) has little information and they can only schedule node in topology

Hello, I''m currently searching for any kinds of informations about writing new queue discipline and/or filter modules. I have to write a discipline and/or filter to implement an experimental stateful router which maintain a table for TCP connections. The original code from A. Kuznetsov is provided without comments. It would be wonderful to have a version with comments, do you have any?

Hi, Is there any specific good weight and cap value for Dom-0 which keep more stable the Dom-0? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

Hi Everyone, How can I make use of xm sched-credit in a VPS hosting environment? Can I use "xm sched-credit -d <domain>" in a script at system startup, or does this have to be run after the respective guest has been started? Also, what happens when the guest is shutdown then restarted, or rebooted? Do I need to run that command again? If so, how would I automate this process?

I have xen 3.2 running on an 8 core server. I tried to set xm sched-credit -d mydomain --weight=1024 --cap=800 and got: Error: cap is out of range. I thought 8 cores are 800% ?! So, do I have du use 100 (for 100%) instead of 800 (for 100%)? And what about vcpus in my domu config? Must I set vcpus when cpu_weight is set? If yes (e.g. vcpus = 2) does this restrict cpu_weight only to 2 cpus?? Very

Add sys/types.h include to fix: /usr/lib/klibc/include/sched.h:20:40: error: expected ?)? before ?int? /usr/lib/klibc/include/sched.h:21:39: error: expected ?)? before ?unsigned? /usr/lib/klibc/include/sched.h:22:39: error: expected ?)? before ?unsigned? /usr/lib/klibc/include/sched.h:35:1: error: unknown type name ?pid_t? Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> ---

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 11:33 -0400, Andrew Friedley wrote: > I've found that I need to set the -pre-RA-sched parameter when using > tools like llc to get the kind of instruction scheduling I want. > > However I'm normally generating and running code on the fly using the > JIT, and can't figure out how to set the -pre-RA-sched option anywhere > other than on the

Hi Andrew, On 04/19/10 14:27, Andrew Friedley wrote: > Sorry for responding to my own message but I would really appreciate > some help with this. > > Looking through the documentation again this morning I noticed that > setSchedulingPreference is a protected method of LLVMTargetLowering, so > it looks like it's not something I can call directly anyway. > Furthermore

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > I'm briefly enabling the MachineScheduler pass for x86 tonight to collect > information on any failures that may show up. > > To properly enable the new scheduler, this hook is implemented in > X86Subtarget: > > bool enableMachineScheduler() const LLVM_OVERRIDE { return true; } > >

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/10/2017 09:14 AM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: >> >> See the 'wt' on the first fmul in exacanv110.fp, exacmnv110.fp and >> exasanv110.fp. Any ideas on what could be causing the first fmul to require >> $r0 and/or $r1? > > > 'tex nodep $r4 $r2

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the late response, been busy with some personal stuff + work... > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Samuel Pitoiset >> <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: >>

>>> On 21.03.16 at 13:24, <JGross at suse.com> wrote: > @@ -758,9 +759,14 @@ struct smp_sync_call_struct { > static void smp_call_sync_callback(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct smp_sync_call_struct *sscs; > + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); So this obtains the vCPU number, yet ... > sscs = container_of(work, struct smp_sync_call_struct, work);