similar to: B410P, dahdi in TE, PtmP mode ?

Hi, My setup is: IPPhone1 --- Asterisk1 with B410P ---- Patton 4638 --- Asterisk2 --- IPPhone2 I want to evaluate Asterisk1 in TE/PtmP mode. So, Patton box is configured in NT/PtmP (with 3 BRI links between both systems). Anyway, asterisk -rx "pri show spans" keeps replying : PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 2/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 3/0: Provisioned,

Hi all, So, we reverted the LibPRI version and tested it, and then tried with the latest version of everything. Still no changes. The BRI line is in PTMP. If we set the configs to PTMP in the genconf_parameters and try it, we get the following: [Jan 21 17:32:20] ERROR[20341]: chan_dahdi.c:12645 dahdi_pri_error: Unable to receive TEI from network! If we set it to PTP (which it is not) we

The DAHDI docs actually include the 'steps' that used to be in Zaptel's 'make b410p'. These steps involve downloading and compiling mISDN. Why re-invent the wheel? Just a thought :-). As for the 100ohm termination bit - it's simply changing a couple of dip switches on the b410p card (as described in the manual). Andy -----Original Message----- From:

Hi, Until now I've been using my Digium B410P cards with misdn 1.0.x. I would like to upgrade my systems and am now wondering which is the "best" route to take: - use the latest release of misdn v1 - upgrade to the latest "stable" kernel and use the built-in misdn v2 - use misdn v2 as a seperate package (disable misdn in the kernel) - use dahdi's support for misdn

Hello, Is it possible, for testing, to connect an cat5 straight patch cord between 2 ports of a Digium B410P card and use these 2 ports as a normal dahdi trunk ? I've tried this: One port is set as NT, the other as TE. I would expect timing to come for system hardware so I choose in /etc/dahdi/system.conf : span=1,0,0,ccs,ami span=2,0,0,ccs,ami Results: - both ports lights are green -

Hi all, I am having trouble setting the signalling method for the B410P using DAHDI. Asterisk complains that it has never heard of 'bri_cpe' or 'bri_net' - but it doesn't mind having 'pri_cpe' etc. ERROR[4294]: chan_dahdi.c:11327 process_dahdi: Unknown signalling method 'bri_net' Dahdi - dahdi-linux-complete-2.1.0.4+2.1.0.2 Asterisk - 1.4.23.1 Libpri - 1.4.9

Apart from you were dialling out on your inbound context and vice-versa. The best advice I can give now is to change to mISDN - as this is proven to work with v1.4 and v1.6. Actually - have you tried putting the 100ohm termination on for your NT port? I need to do that with mISDN as it only allows ptmp for ISDN extensions. Cheers Andy -------------- next part

Hi, At the moment, libpri /w Asterisk 1.6, Dahdi 2.1, is not supporting NT-Point to multi-point mode. Here (France), most small PBXes are connected to ISDN through BRI trunks in PtmP (don't know why but it seems the general case). So this NT-PtmP function would be very helpful to easily slide an Asterisk box between an existing PBX and the network. Does the same case apply elsewhere (UK,

Hi, I'm experiencing difficulties to get a B410P running with Asterisk 10.3.1 and DAHDI 2.6.1. Am I supposed to use DAHDI for this card and ISDN BRI for my country (Belgium)? thx, BC

asterisk-users at lists.digium.com has now been added to the filters white list! Anyway, 100ohm termination isn't required for ptp - but is required for ptmp. I know the DAHDI package(s) no longer include make b410p - hence the reason it is included in the docs.

Hi, 1. Has someone met any success at all, connecting a Digium B410P to a Patton Smartnode 4638 (with latest 5.3 firmware) ? 2. If positive, then, which signalling was used on both sides ? My project's goal is use a Patton Smartnode 4638 to act as telco BRI lines, from a B410P-enabled asterisk box. In my testings, I can see channel is respectively up (with patton web server status page)

Hi, After an upgrade, I discovered yesterday strange things I would like to share here. Basically, I'me comparing platforms: The first one is a 2.6.26 (Debian Lenny) platform, with Asterisk 1.6.1.18, Libpri 1.4.10.2, Dahdi revision 8853 (must be between 2.3 and 2.5, I think). The second one is a 2.6.32 (Debian Squeeze) platform, with Asterisk 10.5.1, Libpri 1.4.12, Dahdi 2.6.1. Both are

Hi, As you may know, these ISDN BRI features are very important here in Europe as ISDN Basic Rate Access is very popular among Small & Medium Entreprises. I don't really know why but it seems that in many countries, default is to install small PBX using Point-to-Multipoint (PtMP) mode as opposed to Point-to-Point (PtP) which is the norm for PRI. So basically, in several countries, SME

Hello everybody, I try to install -Ubuntu 8.04 server- a B410P and a TDM2400P together with Asterisk 1.4.26-2, dahdi-linux-2.2.0.2 and dahdi-tools-2.2.0. Problem I face is the following one: CLI> module load chan_dahdi.so == Registered application 'DAHDISendKeypadFacility' == Registered application 'ZapSendKeypadFacility' == Parsing

Hi, I need to rebuild a system which has 4 BRI ports and is connected to Point-to-multiPoint lines, in a country where telco often "drop lines for energy savings". I'm planning to use latest 11.4.0 asterisk version along with dahdi and libpri (no misdn). Which version are recommended for Dahdi and Libpri ? My main requirements are, beside having calls coming in and out: - keep a

Hi all, I wanted to switch from my current setup (mISDN) to the native dahdi with b410p support (wcb4xp). All works fine for normal phone calls but not for faxing. Faxes are distorted, if arriving at all, and hylafax logs the usual bad stuff (HDLC frame not byte-oriented.) Our setup uses a digium b410p card with asterisk 1.6, latest libpri and dahdi, hylafax with iaxmodem, and all this on 1

Hi Olivier It seems wrong configuration, because according to your mail Asterisk it will be acting as terminal mode (ie Patton gateway acting as network and asterisk as terminal). But Asterisk message is indicated Asterisk a s a NT mode [ 212.226050] wctdm24xxp 0000:0a:01.0: xhfc: Configuring port 0 span 1 in NT mode with termination resistance ENABLED. It could help by checking parameters on

Hi all, Last night I went to replace an Asterisk 1.4 + mISDN + b410p box with Asterisk 1.6.2 and DAHDI BRI - to no avail. I had two servers so copied network setting etc from the working one, moved the card across, ran dahdi_genconf etc and it didn't work. Here's the console output with notices disabled: lucas*CLI> pri intense debug span 1 Enabled debugging on span 1 [Dec 16

Hi, Reading http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/bri.html , it seems PtP is the way to connect businesses but if you read http://public.swbell.net/ISDN/connect.html you would think the opposite. Can anyone elaborate a bit PtP or PtmP respective advantages ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I would appreciate some advice on the following: how does one use a single BRI port HFC chipset based ISDN cards with the latest DAHDI, libpri and Asterisk 1.8? For Asterisk 1.4 I would first install mISDN & mISDNuser and then build Asterisk 1.4. Now I noticed that Digium's HFC chipset based B410P is supported by the latest DAHDI & libpri but reading the source of the