similar to: Channel variable to identify the calling SIP peer

Hi folks I have a handset talking to Asterisk, which in turn puts the call through to an ITSP. The handsets likes to send audio in 40ms frames (even though Asterisk requests 20ms frames with a ptime header in the SDP). The ITSP doesn't request any particular frame length (with ptime) or state a maximum length (with maxptime), so when Asterisk receives the 40ms media frames from the handset,

Hi folks When connecting two SIP users, is there any way to stop Asterisk from sending SIP 183 Session Progress messages, either globally or per-peer? Call from UA1 to Asterisk (UA2) to UA3 UA3 sends RTP before SIP OK to Asterisk (UA2) Asterisk (UA2) detects early audio from UA3 and sends 183 Session Progress with SDP to UA1. Instead I would like it to just send on the early audio, is this

[Resent due to non-descriptive subject line.] Hi folks When connecting two SIP users, is there any way to stop Asterisk from sending SIP 183 Session Progress messages, either globally or per-peer? Scenario as follows: Call from UA1 to Asterisk (UA2) to UA3. UA3 sends RTP before SIP OK to Asterisk (UA2). Asterisk (UA2) detects early audio from UA3 and sends 183 Session Progress with SDP to

finished hooking up the altivec stuff so it works in ProjectBuilder. I ran a test, doing a 'flac -t' on 400MB of files compresses at level 5. the runtime dropped from from 180 sec to 105 sec! once I get the latest autotools on my ibook I'll try and get asm compilation to work that way. Josh --- Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, checked it all in (only minor

Howdy. I'm working on Altivec versions of some of the libFLAC functions. I figured the best candidates would be those that had MMX/SSE/3dnow versions, and I picked FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() to do first, since it's relatively simple. In stepping through some runs, it appears that 'order' mod 4 is always 0. Is that guaranteed, either by the format or by higher functions in the

In case you cut and paste this, I think Matt meant argv[3] to be --tag=artist=%artist -- Brady Patterson (brady@spaceship.com) Do you know Old Kentucky Shark? On Sun, 25 May 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > flac -o %o --tag=title=%artist --tag=album=%album --tag=title=%song > --tag=tracknumber=%track %f

Hi. I want to add some code to flac and am having trouble building it out of cvs. I've had several problems, most of which were pretty easy to work around or had already been discussed here. But this one has me stumped (though I am admittedly new to autoconf, automake, and libtool). Here's the problem. autoconf does not see any definition for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. There is such a

--- Brady Patterson <brady@spaceship.com> wrote: > > Brady, I would say for now, your proposal is fine. I am going > > to move flac to getopt soon... > > > > Matt, that would be cool if you wanted to take on the audiofile > > support. I have actually been waiting to ask you for that, > > waiting until I got the getopt support done, and the new > >

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:04:38PM -0500, Brady Patterson wrote: > > > The patch I submitted only reads AIFF files. I'm about to start > the patch to > > write AIFF files. > > > > To do so, we need a command-line option to specify AIFF. My > inclination is to > > add an option: > > > >

Dear All: I am using lmer() {lme4} to analyze results from a reciprocal transplant experiment where the response variable is modeled as a function of two fixed effects and their interaction. Example data follow: #library(lme4) #library(gmodels)

On 2015-09-02 08:22, Mark Foley wrote: > Mike, > > I thought I pretty much did the same thing as the backup script: backup > ldb, do > tar. Also, I am stopping Samba for good measure, but I don't think I > need to. > What makes you say I'm doing the "exact opposite" of what the samba > script does? > Please explain, I want to be consistent with

Here's what I listed in that email. Merging doesn't appear to be necessary. If you have any build problems, let me know. Note that my detection code is Darwin-specific. It's a BSD call (sysctl()), so a change to the platform-detection macros should enable it to work on other BSDs. However, I don't know what that would be, and I couldn't determine any safe way to do the check

I am having trouble calling the lmer function in the {Matrix} package. I first installed and loaded {Matrix} as follows: > install.packages("Matrix") > library(Matrix) The package loaded successfully, however when I attempted to call lmer, I received the following message: Error: could not find function "lmer" I also tried: < ?lmer which produced no search

I always use --prefix, and it gets put in the right place (<prefix>/include/FLAC/assert.h), which I'm sure sheds no new light on this. I'd still like to know why FLAC__ASSERT() is necessary. K&R is very clear that the preprocessor is to remove calls to assert() if NDEBUG is defined. (Some compilers, including gcc, implicitly define NDEBUG when optimizing, but of course it can

<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable;

On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 12:52, John Gardeniers wrote: >> Hi Brady, >> >> I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my >> newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when >> installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that >> everything else is working, or the file

The patch I submitted only reads AIFF files. I'm about to start the patch to write AIFF files. To do so, we need a command-line option to specify AIFF. My inclination is to add an option: -ff { raw | wav | aif } In some sense, "-ff" is silly since it probably stands for "format format". Still, I think it's better than just "-f", since the first

On 01/07/2020 20:16, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > For the record, with the support of TranquilIT we added a new server for DC an "demoted" this one to fileserver only and it's working like a charm. > > So I suppose the "single server" solution is not viable anyomre, or at least it doesn't seem so. > We have never recommended using a DC as a fileserver,

Thanks. I was worried about the assembler invocation but it looks like you solved that problem. Smooth build on my pbook (G4, 10.2.8, gcc-3.3, ac-2.59, am-1.6.3). Only problem was lack of check for docbook-to-man; my patch is attachments 1-2. Not so smooth on my imac (G3, 10.2.8, gcc-3.3, ac-2.52, am-1.6.1; that's what came with the last 10.2-compatible dev tools). First problem: typo in

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, John Steele Scott wrote: > That looks fine to me as well. However, the best solution is something which > Luca suggested a few months ago, which is to use the functions defined in > altivec.h. These are C functions which map directly to Altivec machine > instructions. I am willing to help out, but I don't find the current lpc_asm.s > very easy to follow, and