similar to: manager event privilege: call, all? what is?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80000 matches similar to: "manager event privilege: call, all? what is?"

2003 Oct 15
0
Manager Interface Needs a protocol
I was using the Asterisk::Manager perl module and had some troube with it so I decided to make my own. I have a pretty good prototype after a few hours (My main point about the protocol is at the bottom of this example.) http://asterisk.650dialup.com is where you can download it. my $man = init Asterisk::AstMan ({ -user => "asterisk",
2005 Sep 30
4
C Manager Interface Client
List: This is my first manager client that I've written so please bear with me: I am trying to write a C manager interface client to interface with our CRM software. I am having an issue while reading the data from the manager interface. I am writing this in C and I have the following code: while(1) { bzero(buffer,sizeof(buffer)); readCode = read(socketHandle,buffer,sizeof(buffer));
2011 Sep 06
17
ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36
Hi: I''ve met an ext4 Bug in dom0 kernel 2.6.32.36. (See kernel stack below) 32.36 kernel commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=ae333e97552c81ab10395ad1ffc6d6daaadb144a The bug only show up in our cluster environments which includes 300 physical machines, one server will run into this bug per day. Running ontop of every server, there are about 30
2009 Jun 30
0
Redirect with ExtraChannel on Bridged call give AMI event with second channel name AsyncGoto/...<ZOMBIE>
Originally posted on asterisk-dev with no response for 5 days, so posting it to the wider audience now. Asterisk Release 1.6.1.1 Scenario:- 1. 2 SIP peers (Zoiper softphone, if it matters) registered as 901 and 902 2. Using AMI, 901 is Originated 3. When 901 answers, it is Redirected to an extension "exten => dial,1,Dial(SIP/902)" 4. 902 rings, then answers 5.
2006 Apr 07
0
Call tracking through chan_agent using the Manager API
Hey, We've been working on tracking all inbound calls to certain call-centre members and have hit a snag, it seems when a queue delivers a call to an Agent, chan_agent will call Local/whatever but provide no means of associating the call in the queue with the local call. To that end i added in an event called AgentAssociate which looks like this: 'DestChan' =>
2003 Jun 16
1
GroupMap : 'Privilege >> No privilege'
Hello, I'm using Samba3Beta1 and i try to map group. I create a posix group in my ldap: dn: cn=Administrateurs du domaine,ou=Groups,dc=middleearth,dc=ring objectClass: posixGroup cn: Administrateurs du domaine memberUid: root memberUid: administrateur gidNumber: 1000 And I try to map this group with the nt group : Domain Admins net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins"
2003 Mar 26
2
[Bug 521] PAM authentication not working in privilege seperation mode running in trusted system on hp-ux
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521 Summary: PAM authentication not working in privilege seperation mode running in trusted system on hp-ux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: HPPA OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd
2000 Jun 09
0
OpenSSH's UseLogin option allows remote access with root privilege. (fwd)
-- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org (home) -or- djm at ibs.com.au (work) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:06:30 +0200 From: Markus Friedl <markus.friedl at informatik.uni-erlangen.de> To: BUGTRAQ at SECURITYFOCUS.COM, misc at openbsd.org,
2000 Jun 09
2
OpenSSH's UseLogin option allows remote access with root privilege.
OpenSSH's UseLogin option allows remote access with root privilege. 1. Systems affected: The default installation of OpenSSH is not vulnerable, since UseLogin defaults to 'no'. However, if UseLogin is enabled, all versions of OpenSSH prior to 2.1.1 are affected. 2. Description: If the UseLogin option is enabled the OpenSSH server (sshd)
2011 Dec 22
0
[PATCH] Security: Mitigate possible privilege escalation via SG_IO ioctl (CVE-2011-4127, RHBZ#757071)
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> CVE-2011-4127 is a serious qemu & kernel privilege escalation bug found by Paolo Bonzini. http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2011/q4/536 An untrusted guest kernel is able to issue special SG_IO ioctls on virtio devices which qemu passes through to the host kernel without filtering or sanitizing. These ioctls allow raw sectors from
2002 Jul 10
2
[protois@ensea.fr: NVIDIA and Privilege Separation]
Does someone understand this? I do not. Niels. ----- Forwarded message from laurent Protois <protois at ensea.fr> ----- Subject: NVIDIA and Privilege Separation From: laurent Protois <protois at ensea.fr> To: provos at citi.umich.edu X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7-1mdk Date: 10 Jul 2002 09:29:45 +0200 Hi Niels, i have a little problem with openssh 3.4 and Nvidia kernel driver:
2011 Apr 21
1
AST-2011-006: Asterisk Manager User Shell Access
Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2011-006 Product Asterisk Summary Asterisk Manager User Shell Access Nature of Advisory Permission Escalation Susceptibility Remote Authenticated Sessions Severity Minor
2011 Jun 16
1
Privilege Separation Design Question
Hello all, I have a question about the design of the privilege separation aspect of openSSH. From what I understand, the interface between the privileged process and the unprivileged one is implemented as a set of well-defined operations with only a small subset of these operations enabled at any given time. These operations are enabled and disabled depending on the task at hand. What I am
2003 Apr 13
0
sounds /vm-*.gsm / apps_voicemail.c
I have modified the content of some of the vm-*.gsm files in /var/lib/asterisk/sounds. The only problem is that everytime I recompile apps_voicemail.c the original vm-*.gsm files overwrite the content of /var/lib/asterisk/sounds. My CVS is 04/07/03. I used to just be able to make modifications to the running system, then copy from /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/vm-*.gm to /usr/src/asterisk/sounds/ and
2020 Jul 30
2
No such privilege exists: SeDiskOperatorPrivilege
Samba Folks, I'm running into a bit of a mystery. I installed Samba on RHEL 8, we're integrated with Active Directory level 2008. When we try to set the disk operator privilege, it comes back with a message that the privilege does not exist. Any thoughts on how to troubleshoot this? I've scoured the internet for ideas, tried them all, and nothing works. Please advise, I'm stuck
2009 Jul 21
2
Graphical Call Manager Allowing Transfer of Any Call?
I'm looking for a graphical call manager for Asterisk. Ideally this would run locally on a desktop system or be web based. I'm familiar with iSymphony, FoP, HUDlite, AstAssistant, ADM, etc but I'm finding a common problem. They all let you transfer calls that connected to an 'extension' but not 'any' call on the system. For example, when a party calls into an * system,
2002 Jul 05
1
[jlevine@utcnist.colorado.edu: Privilege separation]
Is this a known problem? Niels. ----- Forwarded message from Judah Levine <jlevine at utcnist.colorado.edu> ----- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 08:58:46 -0600 (MDT) From: Judah Levine <jlevine at utcnist.colorado.edu> To: provos at citi.umich.edu Subject: Privilege separation Hello, I have just installed openssh-3.4p1 on a COMPAQ/DEC/HP Alpha running True64 UNIX v4.0F. The privilege
2007 May 14
0
[SAMBA-SECURITY] CVE-2007-2444: Local SID/Name Translation Failure Can Result in User Privilege Elevation
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
2002 Jul 01
0
[Bug 327] New: monitor_fdpass.c: Expected 1 got 1075033556 - Privilege Separation
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327 Summary: monitor_fdpass.c: Expected 1 got 1075033556 - Privilege Separation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo:
2015 Jun 18
0
privilege of process executed by extprograms plugin
Hi, I'm just a beginner of extprograms plugin of sieve. When I execute a process via execute or pipe command, the process start with "root" privilege. Why? I believe the process must be executed with recipient privilege. Give me some checkpoints, or hints, please. My setup is as follows: Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS 64bit + dovecot-core, dovecot-sieve plugin { sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve