similar to: When shall SIP phone reply "480 Temporarily Unavailable"

Hi, Using FOP, I've met a situation which makes me ask this simple question : Are both A and B commands bellow equivalent ? A. CLI: originate SIP/9122 application dial Local/9123 at local B. AMI/FOP: 192.168.64.5 -> Action: Originate 192.168.64.5 -> Channel: SIP/9122 192.168.64.5 -> Async: True 192.168.64.5 -> Callerid: 9122 Guest2 <9122> 192.168.64.5 -> Exten: 9123

MWI-related SUBSCRIBE message to send NOTIFY messages changing phones MWI status. This is fine for me but I'm wondering what if I were using SIP hardphones refusing any such NOTIFY without prior SUBSCRIBE (does such phones exist ?) ? 1. In this case, which URI shall use a hardphone to build its SUBSCRIBE message ? Here is a hand written example. Which value should I substitute to foo (in this

On Jun 17, 2015 11:27 AM, "Oscar Roozen via Syslinux" <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > Dear people on the Syslinux Mailinglist, > > Are there any known problems with the performance of TFTP in (U)EFI > environments in general or maybe just on VMWare? I don't believe so. I use Workstation 10.0.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 for the moment. > Right now I'm running

Dear people on the Syslinux Mailinglist, Are there any known problems with the performance of TFTP in (U)EFI environments in general or maybe just on VMWare? Right now I'm running tests on two virtual environments using either VMWare Workstation 11.1.0 on a Fedora 21 system or VMWare Player 7.1.0 on an Ubuntu 14.10 system. Both virtual systems support PXE booting in UEFI mode. Both systems

hi, i try to get this tsize capable tftpd running, but it doesn't fork. (as read the strace output and the process table) strace: 9122 execve("/usr/sbin/in.tftpd", ["/usr/sbin/in.tftpd", "-u", "nobody", "-s", "/var/tftpboot/"], [/* 35 vars */]) = 0 9122 uname({sys="Linux", node="saturn", ...}) = 0 9122

Hi! I wish you all e Happy New Year first! Allthough, I'm relative new to Asterisk, I got our server up and Running, Softphones, ISDN, and a brand new Snom 821 are working flawlessly. :) Platform is Debian 8/Asterisk Packages (11) from Debian Repo. But I am running into problems setting up 2 older Hardphones, Thomson 2030S. :( with in my sip.conf, I have got for this hardphone: [...]

<snip> Replaces: pickup-9582-c0a80101-d-4 at 192.168.101.102 <snip> This Replaces header refers to RFC3891 which is not yet supported in Asterisk (see http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SLA) This INVITE fails with : <snip> chan_sip.c: Trying to pick up 7792 at subs <snip> app_directed_pickup.c: No target channel found for 7792. If I'm dialing *87792 instead

Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist" and obviously not taken into account as endpoint GUI remains unchanged. Looking deeper into this here are : NOTIFY message accepted by S450IP NOTIFY sip:7531 at 192.168.100.197:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.100.254:5060;branch=z9hG4bK06adc48b;rport From: "asterisk" <sip:asterisk at asterisk>;tag=as4ea953db To: <sip:sip:7531 at

<--- SIP read from 192.168.32.245:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 481 CallLeg/Transaction Does Not Exist Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.32.16:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7508a694;rport From: "asterisk"<sip:asterisk at 192.168.32.16>;tag=as2ff08179 To: <sip:5386 at 192.168.32.245:5060;user=phone>;tag=c0a80101-2ce1bc03 Call-ID: 2fa28b4-c0a80101-d-9acc at 192.168.32.245 CSeq: 143 NOTIFY

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

Hi all, In my system, samba (3.0.34) is configured as PDC with an LDAP backend and has some user and machine accounts, and it all works fine. But recently I've found out that if I remove one machine account from the LDAP server user logins into the domain from that machine are still possible, even if the machine login verification fails: "... [2009/05/05 19:34:47, 2]

I normally try not to ask questions until I have done as much research as possible, and again, this is the case... Just after I thought I had my RH5 samba/nis server working fine, I come across the inability to update nis passwords. >From the server as root: passwd guest1 Changing password for user guest1. New UNIX password: Retype new UNIX password: NIS password could not be changed.

Hi Folks: I am getting a "No driver found" dialogue when I try to build a guest using virt-install using a kickstart file. I am stuck. I am not sure how to fix or even debug this problem. Can anyone suggest a way forward? Here are the commands that I am using: $ # ================================================================ $ # Create the volume $ #

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > The proper fix isn't that hard - just avoid allocations under lock. > > > > > > Patch posted, pls take a look. > > > > Your patch allocates pages in order to inflate the balloon, but > > your patch will allow leak_balloon() to deflate the balloon. > > How deflating the balloon (i.e. calling

On a relatively new Nagios 2.x / CentOS 4.x server (only like a week old), I am experiencing gd(-devel/-progs) problems and am wondering if I should just scrape and rebuild. Here is my situation: I installed LAMP+Nagios+NagiosQL and was going to install PerfParse so that I could have trending info integrated with Nagios. The configure script would run ok, but would crap out on make &&

I'm a bit confused because the fellows who answer do this straight to my personal address. I had to reply-to-all to get the mailinglist's address. Is this intentional? I don't see the point. Shouldn't all communication only go via the mailinglist? However, I'm now off the list. Dennis

so since Gerhard told me where to find that patch, ohh god there are many patches, i got the idea, to download all patches and patch wine ... but would that make eny sence ? or would i destry wine with it ? thanks m.angermann

Hi everybody! At least xen 3.0 packages seem to be working, tested, and in a pretty good shape... (I haven't personally tested xen-unstable, so I cannot say) I propose releasing rev150 in unstable or at least experimental in the next few days... No, this is not a late april's fool... :D Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? Rants? Guido

Christoph Hanle schreef op 17-8-2013 18:08: > I think I will use gxpelinux.0 from 4.07 or 4.05 for "quick and dirty" > boot and have the 5.1x with gpxelinux.0 or lpxelinux.0 in the lab and > testing phase. Wouldn't iPXE be an option? It might have a couple of menu options nowadays, like Syslinux always has had. http://ipxe.org/wimboot Bernd

I've partially ported the OCaml bindings to support LLVMContext, and I wanted to get people's opinion on how to implement it in the API. For the LLVM's C++ api, many key functions were modified to only take a LLVMContext, such as replacing the global variable Type::FloatTy with a function Type::getFloatTy(LLVMContext&). For llvm-c though, we need to maintain backwards compatibility