similar to: Can asterisk support 20 user's conference?

Hello, Try this. ss1 <- "z:f(5, a=3, b=4, c='1:4', d=2)" ss2 <- "f(5, a=3, b=4, c=\"1:4\", d=2)*z" fun <- function(s) sub("(\\().*(\\))", "\\1\\2", s) fun(ss1) #[1] "z:f()" fun(ss2) #[1] "f()*z" Hope this helps, Rui Barradas On 5/21/2018 2:33 PM, Vito M. R. Muggeo wrote: > dear all, > I am stuck

All - I've been wrestling with how to best structure the sip device accounts on a new asterisk server I'm deploying. All of the sip devices (currently only Linksys SPA941s) will reside on the same subnet as the server, and I have already set up a decent automatic provisioning system for the phones. When the rollout is complete, there will be about 100 SIP devices authenticating and

This drop-in patch increases the performance of the get_checksum1() function on x86-64. On the target slow CPU performance of the function increased by nearly 50% in the x86-64 default SSE2 mode, and by nearly 100% if the compiler was told to enable SSSE3 support. The increase was over 200% on the fastest CPU tested in SSSE3 mode. Transfer time improvement with large files existing on both ends

I would use sub("\\(.*\\)", "()", s) It is essentially the same as Rui's suggestion, but I find the purpose to be more clear. It might also be a little more efficient. HTH Ulrik On Mon, 21 May 2018, 15:38 Rui Barradas, <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hello, > > Try this. > > > ss1 <- "z:f(5, a=3, b=4, c='1:4', d=2)" >

I've read up some more on the subject, and it seems the proper way to do this with GCC is g++ and target attributes. I've refactored the patch that way, and it indeed uses SSSE3 automatically on supporting CPUs, regardless of the build host, so this should be ideal both for home builders and distros. Getting the code to build right in c++ mode (checksum_sse2.cpp only) was a bit of an

dear all, I am stuck on the following problem. Give a string like ss1<- "z:f(5, a=3, b=4, c='1:4', d=2)" or ss2<- "f(5, a=3, b=4, c=\"1:4\", d=2)*z" I would like to remove all entries within parentheses.. Namely, I aim to obtain respectively "z:f()" or "f()*z" I played with sub() and gsub() but without success.. Thank you very

Hola everyone, Solving this issue would be a huge time saver for analyzing my thesis data, so I'll try to be as concise as possible and hope that someone can give me a hand. I am trying to run a function that I created, which works fine until I try to use it with the by function. That function is listed at the bottom (f3) just in case that might be the issue. Essentially I have compiled a

This Friday's edition of the weekly VoIP Users Conference call is all about wideband audio (aka HD Voice) and conferencing. The guest for this call is David Frankel, CEO of ZipDX a commercial service that specializes in wideband conferencing. We expect an interesting call touching on many aspects of VoIP going beyond the traditional phone service, conference bridges, technical standards,

Hi, We're pleased have a 25-year telephony veteran with us tomorrow, Aswath Rao. Aswath maintains that "Trapezoidal VoIP is Evil". Join us and ask questions, make comments, argue about geeky details... and maybe win a Gigaset S675IP SIP/DECT g722-capable phone with an additional handset. Those of us who have these phones like them a lot. All dial in info is here: http://VUC.me -

Hi Guys, In stream_decoder.c when assigning lpc restore function, only IA32 processor benefits from SS2 and SSE4.1 optimization. Shouldn't it be the case for x86_64 processor as well ? Thanks, -- Olivier TRISTAN uvi.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140311/1d49b5c2/attachment.htm

This had a VERY WRONG `To:' address and went straight into my "spam box" into which I don't look too often .. Martin ------- start of forwarded message ------- Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10008212237300.18590-100000 at fisher.stats.uwo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Xiaoqiang Li <lxq at stats.uwo.ca> To: Majordomo-Owner at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: r-help Date: Mon,

Hi! I'm trying to run a game System Shock 2 http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iVersionId=2270 I have a laptop with Celeron M 420 (1600Mhz). SS2 running something about 5-10fps.. opposing for example to DeusEx that runs _very_ smoothly.. I can say it is not less than 50fps or even more(i just don't know how to enable fps counter). Wine version is 0.9.35 Only messages i get from Wine

Are there any speakerphones or other conferencing HW phones that play the audio in stereo? Either their own speakers, or jacks for an amp with room speakers? Is there any way for Asterisk to deliver call legs with stereo channels in the RTP stream? If not, is it possible for Asterisk to keep 2 separate calls, or pairs of legs in a conference call, synced exactly enough (including traveling over

Hello, As a podcaster I use Asterisk extensively and often have several people in a conference room. We'll record the calls via a SIP phone connected to a sound mixer. Is there an easy way to bump up the audio bitrate for all callers connected to the Asterisk server and improve the general sound quality? The server is not used much outside of recording the podcast. We're not opposed to

What is the current best practice to avoid transcoding on an outgoing call to a party whose codec preference is not known in advance? In other words, incoming calls are easy since codecs are negotiated from least-known (the remote party) to most-known (my endpoint) and my codecs can simply be preferred accordingly to match the remote. Outbound calls seem harder. Our endpoints always negotiate

Hello, I have some problems to use G722, when my client sent an invite request to asterisk using G722/16000 codec asterisk respond with G722/8000 codec. I dont know exactly if Asterisk supports G722/16000 codec?? If yes how can I activate It?? Thanks. Rachid. Below wireshak trace:

I think this is a great patch but, in my view, an even better way to tackle the fundamental problem (the performance limitations) is to use a much faster checksum like xxhash, as has been suggested before: https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2019-October/031975.html Cheers, Filipe On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 17:08, Jorrit Jongma via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > This drop-in

I don't disagree that MD5 could (or even should) be replaced so it is no longer the bottleneck in several real-world cases (including mine). However this patch is not for MD5 performance, rather for the rolling checksum rsync uses to match blocks on existing files on both ends to reduce transfer size. On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:44 PM Filipe Maia via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org>

would it perhaps make sense to have a "--disable-sse2/3" commandline switch in rsync, too - at least for some timeframe until this is considered "rock solid" ? i dislike having automatic cpu feature switching code in a tool which needs to be reliable for me, this new optimization may have issues - and without such switch it can't be easily workarounded without replacing

I've got a couple of SPARCstation 2s (about as fast as a fast 486, for most thing) that I'm going to be using for some testing. I realize that these machines are a bit slow, but when connecting via OpenSSH, it's MUCH slower than connecting to my 486-DX 50. The point where it waits is just after "debug: Sent encrypted session key.". The pause is for about 10 seconds, while