similar to: e911

Hi all, I'm trying to make pfSense talk to Samba AD LDAP through "bind credentials to resolve distinguished names" option. One account them successfully connects (Samba logs): [2019/06/12 14:34:41.517364, ?3] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:325(ldb_wrap_connect) ? ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb [2019/06/12 14:34:41.520731, ?3]

On 13/06/2019 16:05, Adam Weremczuk via samba wrote: > I got authentication (bind credentials) working for account2 on the > old DC (Samba 4.0.9): > > CN=account1,CN=Users,DC=matrixscience,DC=co,DC=uk ---> OK > CN=account2,CN=Users,DC=matrixscience,DC=co,DC=uk ---> FAIL > MATRIXSCIENCE.CO.UK\account1 ---> OK > MATRIXSCIENCE.CO.UK\account2 ---> OK > > but

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to convert a courier-imap installation over to using Dovecot, but I'm having some problems with Mail.app on OS X. FTR, we use both Mail.app and Thunderbird. Note that in the Mail.app preferences, I have a blank IMAP Path Prefix. I'm using Dovecot 1.0_rc15 on Gentoo, and Mail.app from OS X 10.4.8, Thunderbird 1.5.0.9.

I have an courier IMAP server running. To get sib dirs working I had to rename them all to begin with a period ".". e.g Maildir Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account1/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account2/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account3/{cur,new,tmp} etc If I uninstall Courier and install dovecot, will these "period" dirs be seen by default? I am fairly new to this and

I have been at my wits end now since Sunday trying to debug an issue that occurred when I tried to update from sernet-samba-4.1.18 to sernet-samba-4.2.2 on my small network. I have one administrator account and two user accounts which I will call account1 and account2. Before I updated I was able to login into any of 3 Windows 7 Professional boxes and 5 linux boxes running CentOS 6.6 using

During the course of a conversation with an member of the IT group who handles the E911 center for our county, I learned that all of the county's E911 is voip based. This got me to wondering why we could not just configure up a SIP or some such trunk directly to the E911 center to handle our emergency traffic. The county seems interested in exploring the possibility. So I'm wondering if

Does anyone have any experience with any SIP or IAX providers that support E911? I'd love to convert entirely to Asterisk at my house, but the lack of emergency dialing has been a major hold-up for me. Thanks in advance for any suggestions! -- Kyle Sexton

How exactly does Asterisk provide E911 service??

I have a client that would like to use asterisk to link their multiples locations together. However, if a person in the remote office dials 911, How can the 911 operator determine WHERE the emergency is?? Since all calss would be going out of the PRI in the main location, the police/fire trucks will show up at our COLO!! I know that there are some that are doing this multi site setup, how did

Hi all, I have two sipgate accounts (numbers), if I have both accounts register only one will work for incoming calls (which is all i'm interested in). However if I disable either account the other account will work perfectly. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks in advance, Ray. Excerpts from sip.conf - [general] 8<---- SNIP! ---->8 Register => 1212121:aaaaaaaa at

Hi, I have > 11 TB hard used Mailstorage, saved als maildir in ext3 on HP EVA. I always wanted to make some mesurements about several influences to the performance (switch to ext4, switch to mdbox), but I never had enough time to do that. At the moment I *need* more speed, we have too much waitI/O on the system and I already used all other performance and tuning-tricks (separated cache,

I believe the 911 is a serious issue if one does an asterisk installation in an office. How do you test 911? Won't they arrest you or something for dialing 911 for no reason and talking to one of their agents who could have taken a more important call? On the other hand what an emergency comes up (like someone got seriously injured) and on top of that asterisk crashed all of a sudden

I just set up a t1 with 2 camma mf 911 trunks on it, and I am having a issue with it. We can call 911 which is routed out these new trunks, and it goes to the 911 center, but they are not getting the ANI and hence "no record found". Our LEC is Embarq, and they say they can see the call come in and send: KP-911-ST and then KP-0-911-ST rather then KP-0-ANI-ST I turned on all the debug

I got authentication (bind credentials) working for account2 on the old DC (Samba 4.0.9): CN=account1,CN=Users,DC=matrixscience,DC=co,DC=uk ---> OK CN=account2,CN=Users,DC=matrixscience,DC=co,DC=uk ---> FAIL MATRIXSCIENCE.CO.UK\account1 ---> OK MATRIXSCIENCE.CO.UK\account2 ---> OK but it's still failing on the new DC (Samba 4.5.16):

Dovecot 1.2.11, using postfixAdmin 2.3 to manage, basically using the postfixadmin schema and sql queries during install. - If I set a forward for an account to go to a remote email address, no dupes. - If I set a forward for an account to go to an email address on the same system, I get a dupe in the inbox of the second address. So if account1 at domain.com has account2 at domain.com as a

Hi, We've got a dedicated T1 with two trunks running into our ILECs selective router for 911. Split out of the T1 into two MF CAMA trunks on ILEC side. I'm trying to use asterisks e911 signaling, but I'm having trouble with the dial command. (== Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:1/0/0)) I'm missing something and I'm thinking it has to do with the hookstate

Ok, So... we've been looking at Intrado as a solution for national E911. They claim to be able to offer FCC compliant E911 services for VoIP companies. However, as I look into things further, they don't seem to have links to all the PSAPs for E911. Now, I understand if the PSAP is not capable of receiving E911 information, the VoIP provider is under no obligation to provide it.

http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=73943&site=lightreading I know e911 has been discussed on ths list before, but I just read this and it got me thinking that if you have a Wholesale VoIP carrier - wouldn't they have to pass e911 on to you as a VoIP provider to, in turn, pass on to your end-users? Of course there would be a fee - just wondering if this is how the

Hi, I'm trying to configure 2 parallel sip trunks between 2 boxes. However I seem to have the problem that when making a call from Box 2 to Box 1, it sometimes says authentication failed because it is using the username of the other trunk. Here's my configuration: Box 1: [dp-dp2] type=peer username=dp-dp2 secret=mysecret qualify=yes host=box.2.ip.address context=from-internal [e911-dp2]

We were able to solve the below problem. I'll post it in case someone encounters the same issue. No need to respond or even read unless you see a better way. Thanks - John We have manually set callerID on our outbound lines to reflect the appropriate DID both for e911 and to be polite to folks we call, e.g.: exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(CALLERID(num)=5197546340) exten =>