similar to: sl75 wlan not able of being pickuped?

Hi guys I have setup a NT4 Domain, using Freeipa as a ipasam backend... Normal user authentication and shares seems to work, but i'm getting an error when trying to join a Windows 7 machine to the domain (see below)... To me it seems to be the same error as here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11245.... Does anyone know if this patch have been implemented in the samba in

Hi, I've been working on migrating my asterisk from zap to sip (due to compatibility issues between my TDM400P and my Hauppauge PVR500). I've purchased a Linksys SPA-3102 and a Siemens Gigaset SL75 WLAN (wireless SIP phone). I managed to get it all working with my asterisk 1.4.0 installation, but I'm seeing some interesting things with the canreinvite option that I can't explain,

Can anybody tell me how I can set-up multiple access points with overlapping coverage, so that a moving WiFi phone user can continuesly use the phone. bye Ronald Wiplinger

We're looking at a large wifi phone deployment, and we're looking for wifi phones that: 1. Are SIP compliant (Asterisk friendly) 2. Provision capable (ideally TFTP of own MAC address) 3. Industrial quality (no cheap plastic stuff). 4. Well documented (and none of the "only telco's get documentation" crap) Does anyone have a suggestion? Thanks, MD -------------- next

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

Hi List, Hope everyone is recovering from the festive season :) (ok we still have new years i guess!) Anyways, I was wondering if anyone has had any successful dealings with WiFi phones and operation with '*' at all? I've been keeping my eye on the LinkSys WIP330 ( http://preview.tinyurl.com/nccxn ) and wondered your collective thoughts? Would I be correct in thinking that (as