similar to: Internal CallerID problem

Hey guys, I am trying to diagnose a hum in my FXO lines I am using an Adtran 750 with 8 FXO ports. I am getting a pretty bad hum on the line during a call. I have checked the Telco side of the 66 block and there is no hum there so it's my problem to fix. I have tried to lower the gain but that reduces the call volume to much. Where else should I be looking? Setup as follows Dell

Need to add some fxs and fxo ports behind a fonebridge2 box any recommendations a channel bank Thanks Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070829/1131cad4/attachment.htm

Samba 4 Simple Samba file share, Domain Controller Users - windows 7 I am having problems getting folder and file permissions to working properly from the Windows clients. No setting I change in smb.conf have any effect on files and folders created from windows clients. (I see this kind of question a lot other places so you must be tired of it.) Smb.conf [GLOBAL] force create mode = 0770

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote: > > Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config > > (in a way that's sane)? > > > Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, while still keeping my config > > easy to parse and avoiding duplicative or deprecated configs? > >

Hi, "Pilgrim" is a quite old, not very popular, adventure from "Arxel Tribe", designed for Windows 95. But is has a very good story, riddles and atmosphere and so I would love to play it. Unfortunately the game crashes at a specific point in the game, which did not happen on my old Win95-PC (doesn't exist anymore). For those who might be familiar with that games, its when

AFAICT we traditionally only support building llvm/clang with the 2 most recent releases of Visual Studio. With the release of VS2019, what do people think of retiring VS2015 support before the next major llvm/clang release? As well as simplifying C++14 migration (admittedly only a little), this should also let us remove a number of hacks (e.g. the alignas/AlignedCharArray hack in

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/37730/ is an example of the ICE when D64146/rL370584 landed. On 01/09/2019 02:23, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > >> On Aug 31, 2019, at 15:14, Nandor Licker via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hello PowerPC fans, >> >> I am attempting to land D64146 and the PowerPC

As well as the actual patch reviews, has there been official approval that the M68k experimental backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component - is there anything else? On 13/11/2020 22:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello! > > On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: >> Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800

-- The C compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 7.3.1 According to buildbot log here http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/37730/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio for Simon's example ICE. Best, Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com From: "Finkel, Hal J. via

I'm running Dovecot 2.2.5 and want to make it refuse SSLv2, SSLv3 and TLSv1.0. Clients will opportunistically use TLS 1.1 and 1.2, but now I want require they do so. Is it enough to set ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!SSLv2:!SSLv3:!TLSv1.0:!aNULL:!MD5 or are there additional settings I need to specify?

We are having the strangest issue that I have seen for some time. A customer of ours with Polycom phones (4x ip335, 2x ip550) will occasionally (maybe 1 in 50 calls) hear ringing on the line along with the other party. It has happened on both incoming and outgoing calls across apparently all of the phones. We use ip550 in our office with Asterisk and have never had such a problem (we run the same

i have already seen usage of __builtin_nontemporal_store but i want to automate identification of non temporal loads/stores. i think i need to go for a pass. is it possiblee to detect non temporal loops without polly? On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:26 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > On 20/01/2018 18:16, hameeza ahmed wrote: > > Actually i am working on vector

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> wrote: > On 24 Nov 2014, at 17:53, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'll be skimming the PRs to see if there are any really critical > regressions, but so far it looks pretty good. > > > > If you are actively disabling the new vector shuffling and have some PR

Is there a working Rails-based CMS out there and available? I''ve looked on the web a bit this morning but have not found anything that can be put in use. Thanks! Nathan Mealey Operations Director Northeast Region Pilgrim IT, LLC NORTHEAST OFFICE 1 Short Street Northampton, MA 01060 TEL 866.434.4976 FAX 413.587.0572 MIDWEST OFFICE 1815 Brownsboro Road Louisville,

On 05/04/2019 09:37, Simon Pilgrim via llvm-dev wrote: > On 04/04/2019 14:11, Sander De Smalen wrote: >> Proposed change: >> >> ---------------------------- >> >> In this RFC I propose changing the intrinsics for >> llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fadd and >> llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fmul (see options A and B). I also >> propose renaming

Hello I am trying to fit a REML to some soil mineral data which has been collected over the time period 1999 - 2004. I want to know if the 19 different treatments imposed, differ in terms of their soil mineral content. A tree model of the data has shown differences between the treatments can be attributed to the Magnesium, Potassium and organic matter content of the soil, with Magnesium being the

Please can we add a code owner entry for llvm-mca, which should probably be Andrea. I wasn't sure if we need to go through a full nomination process for new tools like this (and llvm-exegesis?) or we can just add the primary contributor to the CODE_OWNERS.TXT list immediately. Thanks, Simon.

I have several Polycom IP550 phones running UC 4.0.3, connected to Asterisk 1.8. Setting forwarding for "Always" works as expected; the phone issues a 302 Moved Temporarily, and Asterisk shifts the call to the new location. Setting forwarding to "No Answer" means a 302 never gets issued. It just rings and eventually goes to voicemail. Watching with Wireshark, I never see a

Hi Nicholas, The admin of the buildbot is aware of this, will handle it after long weekend. Thanks. Best, Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail.com> To: Jinsong Ji <jji at us.ibm.com>, "Finkel, Hal J." <hfinkel at anl.gov> Cc: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org"

Actually i am working on vector accelerator which will perform those instructions which are non temporal. for instance if i have this loop for(i=0;i<2048;i++) a[i]=b[i]+c[i]; currently it emits following IR; %0 = getelementptr inbounds [2048 x i32], [2048 x i32]* @b, i64 0, i64 %index %1 = bitcast i32* %0 to <16 x i32>* %wide.load = load <16 x i32>, <16 x i32>* %1,