similar to: Send only Redirect or FWD calls out on specific channel

Hi, I am getting "Got SIP response 405" Method not allowed" error on CLI. I am also getting Port restricted Cone NAT error on my SJ phone. Please help!!!!! Afzaal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050726/e130223c/attachment.htm

Hi, all I have a number of machines that are out of sync with one another by virtue of having done a yum update after a base 6.2 install at different times (all were previous CentOS 5.3) Consequently, systems are a mix of 2.6.32-220.7.1, 2.6.32-220.13.1 or 2.6.32-220.17.1. So 2 questions: - Is it possible to perform a yum update (or another other kind of update), specifying installation

My apologies to the list for inadvertently taking this offline. As info: -----Original Message----- From: Iain Morgan [mailto:Iain.Morgan at nasa.gov] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 8:15 PM To: wfdawson at bellsouth.net Subject: Re: Help with CA Certificates for user authentication? On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 11:53:25 -0500, wfdawson at bellsouth.net wrote: > > Thanks for the

Hi Ron, YES you are correct i am getting tons a day and opend a ticket at microsoft site but didnt get any reply upto now. Recent days i got an email from RAV antivirus domain name ends with "br" saying that one of their server caught the email has antivirus and my email id is in the list too as i know i donno any single member of bunch of email adddress, some are

BellSouth (now AT&T) has a number you can dial and it will play back voice prompts with your calling number? It's used by their techs with a buttset in identifying analog 1FB lines... Eg Dial 704-210-3233, it answers "Seven-Zero-Four-Five-Five-Nine-Two-One-Two-Two" if your dialing from 704-559-2122 ----------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This e-mail

Thanks to Earl for the NUX repo recommendation. Good VLC and ffmpeg versions (for CentOS) here. From what i can tell, atrpms died a death earlier this year or the end of last cheers - cal sawyer Earl A Ramirez <earlaramirez at gmail.com> wrote: To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is ATRPMs dead? On 14 Sep 2015 14:12, "Cal Sawyer"

It looks like it is more like the issue in bug #26. In the tcpdump I can see the client attempt to RRQ the kernel but the client itself reports "No file found." I am having similiar issues as reported in both bug reports with getting Syslinux 6.02 to work as in syslinux64.efi gets pulled but then the client gets stuck on ldlinux.e64. Can I use http/nfs instead after syslinux64.efi gets

Hello all, Wine is getting solid enough that it is appropriate for some real work, however it still is failing write with write errors from MS Word. Updates, reads, edits, fonts, etc all seem to be fine. However any write causes a disk full or permissions error. I am running as root root in this case and other programs under wine write w/o error. If it is any clue the file name shows up as

I have a small problem, Whenever we pickup a call using *8 then try to transfer it via flash or # transfer the call is dropped. Any ideas? Whe have all called exten's in extension.conf ending in |t som that # transfers work. What am I doing wrong? Chad Sawyer, Manager, Network Administrator -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have a pri comming into a t100p in my asterisk box. I have a second t100p configured as pri_net connected to a nas server. I can route modem calls to the NAS with no problem, but I am concerned about isdn data connections. Will asterisk route 64k isdn calls between 2 t100p's? Also, should I expect worse modem connections than normal? Chad Sawyer -------------- next part --------------

On 12/03/2014 04:15 PM, zep wrote: > >>> oh. the ARP packet suggests that MAC address is 192.168.1.144 >> that is how i see it. >> > is that 1.144 IP address in use by the machine you ran the lspci > from? somewhere. but i know not where. http://www.whoami.it/home/ shows me to be; adsl-184-41-28-86.mem.bellsouth.net for the hell of it, i pulled and

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Bob Gleitsmann <rjgleits at bellsouth.net> wrote: > I should have mentioned that this applies to Linus' 3.13.0-rc7 and rc8 > git. Maybe it's obvious. Hey Bob, Thanks for reporting this. Can you try the attached patch instead and report if it helps you? Ben. > > Sorry about that. > > Bob > -------- Forwarded Message --------

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Bob Gleitsmann <rjgleits at bellsouth.net> wrote: >> I should have mentioned that this applies to Linus' 3.13.0-rc7 and rc8 >> git. Maybe it's obvious. > Hey Bob, > > Thanks for reporting this. Can you try the attached patch instead and >

Hi Timo, I am receiving the above error in dovecot's logs, here's how it looks like: dovecot: Aug 05 19:52:19 Info: imap-login: Login: user=<XXXXXXXXXXXX>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured dovecot: Aug 05 19:53:36 Error: IMAP(XXXXXXXXXXXX): FETCH for mailbox Bulk Mails UID 32 got too little data: 9199 vs 39532 dovecot: Aug 05 19:53:36 Info: IMAP(XXXXXXXXXXXX):

Hello everyone I'm using the checkpassword method but I don't get the domain a user inputs. I can't cross check per virtual domains if I'm not getting one, which means it renders all my efforts useless. I've tried sending %d as a variable to my checkpassword script, but I'm just getting %d instead. This is a dump of my information: %ENV = {

I followed the directions I found in the list to a tee http://www.marko.net/asterisk/archives/0209/0389.html The server starts fine, but when I call the festival extension it gives me an OID error variable tts_textasterisk I have RH7.3 festival 1.4.2 speech_tools 1.2.2 patched it with the festival-1.4.2.diff located in the /usr/src/asterisk/ folder . When I patched it, the patch was looking

You think Microsoft's mailing lists and forums are better? Just wait (and wait, and and ...). Oh, that's right, you can call Microsft for help ,,, and shell out $295 per. Dimitri John McLoskey wrote: > Thanks everyone for your lack of any response whatsoever, I find it builds > character to be ignored throughout challenges I encounter in my life. Since > I was unable to

i've been able to consistently reproduced the issue. no luck ID'ing the specific cause, yet. fyi, i've asked as well @ http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/local-postfix-re-delivery-of-dovecot-sieve-redirected-mail-fails-normal-direct-deliveries-are-OK-td107691.html with slightly simple config and cleaner log detail.

adding a second, non-redirect action to the sieve rule in order to test, + require ["copy","fileinto"]; # rule:[SIEVETEST] if header :contains "subject" "SIEVETEST" { + fileinto :copy "testing"; redirect "user2 at example2.com"; } on send exec, the 'fileinto' action does work as expected. the 'redirect' fails

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, everyone - I've been trying for two weeks now to get my print server operational under Samba. After walking through the howtos and tweaking the configs per spec, it just ain't working. Printing from a client machine sends, and then nothing happens. No error messages or anything similar. Printing from the server works fine, but