Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "'Start' in extension rules"
2009 Sep 30
4
deliver: Fatal: setgid(114) failed with euid=8, gid=8, egid=8: Operation not permitted
I'm calling 'deliver' from Postfix and in some cases from
Procmail.
I set this system up more than six months ago and it's been
working flawlessly until yesterday (16:52:19 local time) when
it, without any apparent reason, just stopped delivering mails!
Lots of checking and googling (I've forgot how exacly I setup
the system :), I made 'deliver' SUID and it worked
2007 Sep 25
2
HOWTO/FAQ question (Location: Sweden)
Sorry for this. This is most likely a HOWTO or FAQ question, but
it's so much information and documentation to wade through so
I hope someone could take a minute to answer anyway.
If not, no worries. I'll get to it sooner or later :)
I'm trying to understand what Asterisk actually is and the basic
workings... I think I've understand what I need to get going,
except one thing.
2007 Oct 16
1
Clean Hangup() ?
Took some examples from voip-info.org to deal with
call forwarding etc:
exten => _*21*X.,1,NoOp(Unconditional Call Forward on extension ${CALLERID(num)} to ${EXTEN:4})
exten => _*21*X.,n,Set(DB(CFIM/${CALLERID(num)})=${EXTEN:4})
exten => _*21*X.,n,Hangup()
Problem is that * don't hangup cleanly:
Spawn extension (default, *21*2403, 3) exited non-zero on 'SIP/2401-081e7048'
2007 Nov 01
3
Outgoing PRI CID?
We have now got our new PRI line (10 channels, 100 numbers) connected
and everything is working except the outgoing caller ID. Whatever
SIP phone I'm using, the CID that's shown is the very first number...
----- s n i p -----
[default]
include => outgoing
include => priin
[outgoing]
exten => _NXXXXX.,1,Macro(dial,08${EXTEN},${RINGTIME}) ; Local number (w/o areacode) -
2012 Jan 19
2
CentOS 6.2 KS/Installer
I'm using the kickstart file we developed for v5 on 6.2 in VM (kvm/qemu
running on a CentOS 5.6),
but it fails:
Error partitioning. Could not allocate requested partitions: not
enough free space on disks.
There's nothing wrong with the disk. Both fdisk and parted works fine,
I can view, partition
and write a partition table and the disk is 10.5GB.
However, looking through
2004 Apr 21
1
AD and home directory on Linux
I'm trying to get my home directory (automaticly) mounted from the
AD server via SMB - I can't (don't want to) use NFS, because that
fucks up the file modes (even with SFU it's not compatible enough).
Using LibNSS/LDAP and LibPAM/{LDAP,Krb5} will authenticate me,
get me a ticket and overall work exactly as planed.
However, my home directory isn't availible (I had to create
2007 Oct 13
2
file.c: File digits/ett does not exist in any format
I'm using Swedish on version 1.4.13. The full part of the
log is:
[Oct 13 12:51:16] WARNING[7810] file.c: File digits/ett does not exist in any format
[Oct 13 12:51:16] WARNING[7810] file.c: Unable to open digits/ett (format 0x8 (alaw)): No such file or directory
The word 'ett' means 'one'. We have two words for one: 'en' and 'ett'.
Any idea how to fix/solve
2003 Apr 14
1
Creating softlinks in SMB FS
I'm setting up a Linux (RH8.0) client to authenticate
against an Active Directory. Home directories should also
be located on the AD server.
Everything works fine, exept softlinks...
----- s n i p -----
[root@client1 turbo]# /bin/pwd
/home/turbo
[root@client1 turbo]# mount | grep /home/turbo
//chandler/turbo on /home/turbo type smbfs (0)
[root@client1 turbo]# ln -s /usr/bin/printf printf
ln:
2007 Aug 02
1
Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've upgraded to 3.0.25b, and I can't seem to get it
running for more than a few minutes before it starts
failing to find users...
This is my smb.conf:
- ----- s n i p -----
[global]
workgroup = FREQVIST
netbios name = CELIA
server string = %h server (Samba %v)
idmap backend = ldap:ldap://127.0.0.1
2007 Jul 28
1
Checking the trust account password returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE
I'm trying to setup a FreeRADIUS (version 1.1.6 w/ LDAP support)
server on our new server here at home, which in turn should
authenticate against the Samba server (also on the same host - version
3.0.25) which in turn uses an OpenLDAP server (CVS version HEAD as of
20070719).
Samba works perfectly against the OL server. Authentication
etc is a-ok.
But regarding winbind, the first problem is
2007 Oct 17
1
Portscans and Asterisk
Anything to do about portscans? Is there any way (should I) to see
if the connection is a legit (only SIP currently) connection BEFORE
my * answers?
[2007-10-17 19:23:46] WARNING[4191]: chan_sip.c:6624 determine_firstline_parts: Bad request protocol 01@<ASTERISK_IP> SIP/2.0
-- Executing [s at default:1] Answer("SIP/sip.jmg.se-081dd730", "") in new stack
[2007-10-17
2007 Oct 30
1
ZT_SPANCONFIG failed on span 1: Invalid argument (22)
I'm trying to load ztdummy on my Asterisk, running in a XEN
domain.
I've modified the code to disable the use of an RTC.
I can load the zaptel module just fine, the ztdummy also
loads without problem. But when running ztcfg I get this
error.
----- s n i p -----
graham:~# ztcfg -vvvv
Zaptel Version: 1.4.6
Echo Canceller: MG2
Configuration
======================
SPAN 1: CCS/ AMI
2004 Apr 20
1
AD<->Linux: Thoughts
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have a small planning problem...
I built an environment for a customer about six (or so) months
ago based on RH8 which authenticate and mount homes from an
AD server... The Linux stuff was straigt forward - using LibNSS/LDAP
and LibPAM/{LDAP,Krb5} for authentication and samba (2.x something)
to mount the home directories.
Unfortunatly, this
2011 Jul 26
3
[LLVMdev] Linking opaque types
On Jul 25, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Talin wrote:
> To handle the fact that types do not (and can not, at least as long as we intend to support obscure languages like "C" :) have linkage, the the linker uses a "best effort" approach. It attempts to merge types and rewrite IR to use the merged types where it can, but it doesn't make any guarantees.
>
> I want to add an
2010 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] Cast failure in SelectionDAGBuilder
I'm trying to track down the problem with the assertion failure in
SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. This is the code:
*case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot:
*if* (GFI) {
*const* Value *Alloca = I.getArgOperand(0);
*const* Constant *TypeMap = cast<Constant>(I.getArgOperand(1));
* FrameIndexSDNode *FI =
cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(getValue(Alloca).getNode());*
2005 Jan 19
2
Moving fileserver
I'm having a problem here I'm not sure how to solve, so I
hope someone else have done the same (and succeeded :)
I have an old smb server ('tux') which is ancient (both
in software and hardware) and can't handle the load.
This machine is running version 2.2.3a-14.1 (Debian
GNU/Linux woody) with 'character set = ISO8859-1'.
The new smb server ('bella') runs
2011 Apr 07
1
[LLVMdev] More DWARF problems
On Apr 7, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Talin wrote:
>
> OK I've been checking this out some more, and the DIEs don't look valid to me. Take a look at this output from dwarfdump -v:
>
> 0x000000c7: TAG_subprogram [3]
> 0x000000c8: AT_name( .debug_str[0x000001bd] = "construct" )
> 0x000000cc: AT_MIPS_linkage_name( .debug_str[0x000001c7] =
2010 Nov 07
3
[LLVMdev] Next round of DWARF issues/questions
After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's
conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to
work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set
breakpoints, and examine function parameters.
However, I'm also seeing a lot of new problems which weren't exposed before.
After spending the better part of two
2010 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] Next round of DWARF issues/questions
On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote:
> After to speaking to Devang and a number of other people at the developer's conference, I was able to make some forward progress on getting debugging to work. I'm now able to actually single-step through my program and set breakpoints, and examine function parameters.
>
> However, I'm also seeing a lot of new problems which
2011 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Static destructor problem with recent HEAD
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I recently updated my version of LLVM from revision 140108 to 142082, and
>> several things broke, most of which were easily fixed. However, I'm now
>> getting a "pure virtual method called"