similar to: (FYI) 1-day reminder for 3ComR VCX IP: The future of communications ? taking businesses where they need to go.

One my 4.8 box I recently made a silly mistake sending a mail from the command line, along the lines of: mkn@shrewd$ mail test@knigma.org -c test@knigma.org Subject: test test EOT mkn@shrewd$ WARNING: RunAsGid for MSP ignored, check group ids (egid=1001, want=25) can not chdir(/var/spool/clientmqueue/): Permission denied Program mode requires special privileges, e.g., root

I have searched the internet, and have tried some things I have found, but cannot resolve my issue. Hoping to find some help here. I have a peer to peer network static IP on all workstations, approximately 100 computers running Windows XP pro, and Windows 2000 pro. My desktop, Ubuntu, and one Linux Server, running Red Hat 9. The RH9 machine has Samba v2.27 running as WINS. It is set as

hello all, I'm running Samba on a Fedora 9 installation, on a network of approx. 75 workstations. Using SMB4K, to browse, it only shows the Fedora box on the network, and the IP address is wrong. The IP is configured to 192.168.0.xx but it shows 172.16.140.x, I'm really a little lost on this one. Take that back, I'm way lost. smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT #

I've just updated to a snapshot of 4.9-PRERELEASE. The usb/umass support seems *much* more stable than I found it with 4.8. My Oracom USB MP3 player now works without errors, and achieves up to 400KB/sec throughput. However, if I connect my Belkin CompactFlash reader instead, that's very, very slow indeed. The greatest data rate I see is about 4KB/sec, although no errors are

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:35:36 -0700 > >What's a "compiling mesh?" What I meant, was that there are some implicit defines in mingw (like __GCC) and vcX (like _MVC) but possibly also other unsupported? internal structures. As I stated earlier mingw should be win32 api compliant, but not for complicating matters. But

Greetings i have been using asterisk with good success with soft phones and I need to purchase some Sip capable phones to test. How would/do vendor specific phones like cisco 7900's and 3Com VCX 3100 series phones work SIP to SIP if they download the protocol from the Vendor call centers? I want to build my own with Asterisk, and use different phones. They say they are RFC 2543

when check java process lock statistics, plockstat failed, please see below: # prstat -mLp 21162 PID USERNAME USR SYS TRP TFL DFL LCK SLP LAT VCX ICX SCL SIG PROCESS/LWPID 21162 7677 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99 0.0 0.3 83 89 215 0 java/81 21162 7677 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99 0.2 106 33 305 0 java/35 21162 7677 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 0.1 79 6 85 0 java/59

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:59:01 +0200 "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > >Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:35:36 -0700 > > > > >What's a "compiling mesh?" > > What I meant, was that there are some implicit defines in mingw (like __GCC) > and vcX (like _MVC) but

Hi all This is a followup on my post "Asterisk 13 - system() dialplan app cannot call bash scripts" from yesterday I've given up trying to use system() to call BASH scripts with parameters from Asterisk 13. Turned out under Asterisk 13.22.0 System() DOES work, but only if you do NOT attempt to pass any parameters to the called script. This works, and reliably calls the script:

Good morning people, I try to create a master file on a samba share (Linux server, serving files via the Samba protocol). I have write-access on the folder and saving a 'normal' revit file works perfectly. However, when I try to save a master file (checking the checkbox in options), I get the error: Unable to write, it is read only or opened by somebody else. "Encountered

G00d day! unique watch .gratify your darling!- &#104;ttp&#58;/&#47;x.c&#111;/66&#113;&#53;A &#104;tt&#112;&#58;//x&#46;co/&#54;6q5&#67; &#104;&#116;tp:&#47;/x.&#99;o&#47;66q&#53;&#69; weu ecy lpvpt nia yj fivyp oicj nktmw k so kjy sx qdbg cmvm ejp z etxqa hcp sei mb i mybta ntaw s dwyl eaoj bwyb ud xiobk lu hvp wizhf

After upgrading to openssh-3.4p1, password authentication is no longer working on my system. I'm running Linux RedHat 6.2 with: kernel 2.2.20 openssh-3.4p1 openssl-0.9.6 pam-0.72-6 pwdb-0.61-0 I've tried it with and without compression, with and without priv sep, and I always get errors like this: Jun 30 19:07:48 sugarfreejazz sshd[1344]: Failed password for randy from 10.10.10.2 port

Hi folks; Sorry for the off-topic message. I'll be brief. If anyone has any experience with older Spectrum Technologies Channel Banks (Centra 3000 or Centra 4000), please contact me off-list. Yes, I plan to use this with Asterisk, but I have no manuals... -- Ron Gage - Saginaw, Michigan I am looking for work - resume at http://www.rongage.org/resume.doc Electrical Engineering, Linux

Hello, I'm trying to use adabag to make bagging and boosting with bagging() and adabost.M1(), respectively, but in both cases it produces an abnormal termination of R. My code is: bagging(I.NOSOCO~EDAD+SEXO+ESTANCIA+ADMISI?N+T.CIRUG?+DURACI?N+CONTAMIN +PROFILAX+E.PREOPE+V.PERIFE+V.CENTRA+S.VESICA+S.NASOGA+DREN.ABI+DREN.CER

Hi, How do you folks handle really large queues (350+ simultaneous callers) in your Asterisk PBXes? We're going to be bringing in around 16 PRIs' worth of inbound callers, doing skills-based routing, and queuing them up for approximately 200 agents. What's the best way to handle all of these callers? We want to record the calls and we'll probably use the ramdisk method that has

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97620 Bug ID: 97620 Summary: [REGRESSION] KMS having issues after kernel upgrade (4.5.1-1 to 4.6.4-1) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium

If you''ve been hiding under a rock, not checking your email, then you might not have heard about the Next Big Whopper Event for ZFS Fans: ZFS Day! The agenda is now set and the teams are preparing to descend towards San Francisco''s Moscone Center vortex for a full day of ZFS. I''d love to see y''all there in person, but if you can''t make it, be sure to

Hi. I am running Samba 3.0.22-1 on a Fedora Core 4 system. While troubleshooting an unrelated issue I noticed the following while "tailing" the message log: Apr 24 16:57:37 valiant nmbd[1864]: [2006/04/24 16:57:37, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(396) Apr 24 16:57:37 valiant nmbd[1864]: ***** Apr 24 16:57:37 valiant nmbd[1864]: Apr 24 16:57:37 valiant nmbd[1864]:

Hello. I want to test a multi-site setup w/ replication to a central DC only. In a test scenario I have set up a central samba4 DC (sernet-samba 4.1.12-9). For provisioning I have used the --site=central, so no Default-First-Site-Name has been created on provisioning, just 'central'. In AD Site & Services I have unchecked the "Bridge all site links" in "Inter-Site

data(mtcars) mtcars[rownames(mtcars)!="Valiant",] # fails mtcars[list(rownames(mtcars))!="Valiant",] # runs but I am not getting the expected result With the latter statement, I expected all rows except the one where the name is "Valiant". I must have got something simple wrong; what is it? Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]