similar to: sip.conf best practices?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "sip.conf best practices?"

2007 Aug 27
7
Stereo Conferences?
Are there any speakerphones or other conferencing HW phones that play the audio in stereo? Either their own speakers, or jacks for an amp with room speakers? Is there any way for Asterisk to deliver call legs with stereo channels in the RTP stream? If not, is it possible for Asterisk to keep 2 separate calls, or pairs of legs in a conference call, synced exactly enough (including traveling over
2018 Mar 14
2
Expected performance for WORM scenario
We can't stick to single server because the law. Redundancy is a legal requirement for our business. I'm sort of giving up on gluster though. It would seem a pretty stupid content addressable storage would suit our needs better. On 13 March 2018 at 10:12, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative
2018 Mar 13
3
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek < Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Well, it might be close to the _*synchronous*_ nfs, but it is still well > behind of the asynchronous nfs performance. > > Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture): > > > > #!/bin/csh > > > > set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname` > > set j=1
2018 Mar 13
1
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ondrej Valousek < Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, > but enabling that did not make much effect). > > To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small > files for obvious reasons: > Could you give profile info of the run you did with
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, but enabling that did not make much effect). To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small files for obvious reasons: 1. Single server, does not have to deal with distributed locks 2. Afaik, gluster does not support read/write delegations the same way NFS does. 3. Glusterfs is
2010 Apr 01
3
RPID on called party
Hello, Did anyone manage to force asterisk to put Remote-party-ID attribute on the SIP outgoing call? I.e. When A calls B, I want that A gets a name of B displayed on his phone. Note that name of A gets displayed on the B's phone fine, but this is not what I want. This works with Cisco Call manager fine - the RPID is sent as a part of the response to the SIP INVITE this way: SIP/2.0 180
2018 Mar 13
5
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek < Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Gluster will never perform well for small files. > > I believe there is nothing you can do with this. > It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to NFS now. Andreas, Looking at your workload, I am suspecting there to be lot of LOOKUPs
2005 Aug 10
6
USB handset wanted
Hello all asterisk users! Question: Does anybody know about any good USB handset that would understand SIP and Asterisk and will run with Linux? I have found tons of them, but they are mainly only supported in Windows environment. I would like to set up new phone system in our company that would be based on asterisk acting as PBX and SIP. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Any
2006 Nov 13
8
Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066"> <font size="+1">Hi all,<br> <br> I am interested in
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Well, it might be close to the _synchronous_ nfs, but it is still well behind of the asynchronous nfs performance. Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture): #!/bin/csh set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname` set j=1 while ($j <= 7000) echo ahoj > test.$HOSTNAME.$j @ j++ end rm -rf test.$HOSTNAME.* Takes 9 seconds to execute on the NFS share, but 90 seconds on
2018 Mar 07
1
gluster for home directories?
Hi, On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Why do you need to replace your existing solution? > If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async > NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life. The reason we are also looking into gluster is that we like that it uses standard components
2018 Mar 14
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
That seems unlikely. I pre-create the directory layout and then write to directories I know exist. I don't quite understand how any settings at all can reduce performance to 1/5000 of what I get when writing straight to ramdisk though, and especially when running on a single node instead of in a cluster. Has anyone else set this up and managed to get better write performance? On 13 March
2006 Nov 13
3
FW: Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066"> Hi Dean,<br> <br> I will check that site - thanks for the hint.<br> The biggest problem I see with
2012 Jun 01
2
ssh & control groups
Hi List, I am looking for an option for sshd to start user's shell (when logging in interactively to a remote host) in a control group via cgexec - so for example: /bin/cgexec -g <username> /bin/bash This would be extremely handy on linux Terminal servers to control users access to the system resources (protect system from a malicious user hogging the machine by running cpu/memory
2008 Feb 21
2
Can asterisk support 20 user's conference?
HI, Friends, Now I have 20 polycom?s SS2 phones. Can Asterisk support 20 users conference meeting? And I want to build HD audio conference by using polycom?s 650 ip phone. Can asterisk support G722 HD audio conference? Any friend can help me? Thanks Zhao xiaoqiang 2008-02-21 zhao_x_q -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2008 Nov 04
5
VoIP Users Conference Call Friday Nov 7 On Wideband Voice & Conferencing
This Friday's edition of the weekly VoIP Users Conference call is all about wideband audio (aka HD Voice) and conferencing. The guest for this call is David Frankel, CEO of ZipDX a commercial service that specializes in wideband conferencing. We expect an interesting call touching on many aspects of VoIP going beyond the traditional phone service, conference bridges, technical standards,
2018 Mar 12
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Hi, Gluster will never perform well for small files. I believe there is nothing you can do with this. Ondrej From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Ericsson Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:47 PM To: Gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario Heya fellas. I've been
2009 May 21
2
Jitter buffer question
Hi List, I have a question regarding jitterbuffer in Asterisk 1.4.24. I see that jitterbuffer is only effective on the receiving channels. My asterisk has only SIP accounts + 2 SIP trunk accounts to our branch office. Questions: 1. To enable jitter buffer on SIP channels it seems I have to enable and force it, right? 2. If I enable and force jitter buffer, Asterisk would always have to stay
2011 Feb 07
1
remote bridging
Hi List, Quick question: I am using asterisk 1.8.1 - how do I detect whether a native (remote) bridge is being used between 2 SIP peers? It is not obvious to me from the console logs. Thanks, Ondrej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110207/cf55a5dd/attachment.htm>
2018 Mar 07
0
gluster for home directories?
Hi, Why do you need to replace your existing solution? If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS Ondrej ----- The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use,