similar to: Asterisk 1.4 Ignoring SIP ACK's on 487 Responses

Hi all, I have installed X-lite client on a windowsXP machine and asterisk on an enterprise linux m/c. The client is sending a registration message to asterisk server. It is able to process the message and sends 200 OK back. But later it says "Scheduling destruction of sip dialog xxxx ". Then it says "Really destroying sip dialog xxxx". What to do for this problem??? I

Hi all, I am using asterisk1.2.14,realtime and I find there is a strange case in the receiver's display. I have a dial plan to route a call to the destination. I haven't set the callerid(num) for the caller. In the receive ends, it's display shows "asterisk" when I make a call to the receiver. I wonder why "asterisk" shows in the display as I haven't set

Hi, Recently we got a new feature request from our customer, they want a report to list the duration that agents putting customer on hold, they want to base on this to measure the agents performance. I cannot find any events in cdr, message logs, or manager interface, only when I enable sip debug, then I can see the ReInvite Event in the cli , some thing like the attached logs, is there any

I have a new asterisk install (1.0.7) - and in case it's relevant I'm not using autoload option in modules.conf. Generally all is working well. However, when I make a call from my softphone and try to leave a message, the message is cutoff after a few seconds (whenever I pause for 1 second between words). Strangely, when I use an analog phone connected to my ATA, I can record as long as

I set up my * server using its publc IP address. Now that i switch over to using the domain name, X-Lite can't log in. =========With Domain Name (doesnt work)============ Transmitting (NAT) to 85.250.206.46:6007 <http://85.250.206.46:6007>: SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.250.179.93 <http://85.250.179.93>

Hi; I am running asterisk 1.6 from Fonality (Trixbox PRO). I am trying to initiate a call FROM a softphone client to asterisk (either an internal 4 digit extension call) or an outside line via a SIP trunk. In both cases, asterisk rejects the call with a 420. In this case, it?s a call from x3992 to x4415 Does this require a change on the softphone for x-call-detail? <--- SIP read

I have a SIP account that I can successfully register with XTEN and a Sipura-2000. I have yet to be able to get it to authorize with *. My XTEN looks like: Username: 001234 Password: xxxx Authorization Username: 001234 Domain: domain.net Register with domain:

The SIP trunking service that I am trying to set up keeps saying that my registration from Asterisk is invalid. Asterisk registration: REGISTER sip:{registration_ip} SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP {asterisk_ip}:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5c2eb10c;rport Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:{registration_user}@{registration_ip}>;tag=as5579cc0c To: <sip:{registration_user}@{registration_ip}> Call-ID:

Hi list, How do I make Asterisk 13 (using PJSIP channel) to handle PUBLISH sent from the phones? The trace looks like: ## PHONE -> ASTERISK ## PUBLISH sip:1001 at example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.19.250:2048;branch=z9hG4bK-w2orn21sre9u;rport From: "1001" <sip:1001 at example.com>;tag=98slbhbn16 To: "1001" <sip:1001 at example.com> Call-ID:

REPOSTED with MORE Info and Modified Subject Line: -------------------------------------------------------- I am using one of the Minute Provider to dial out USA numbers. Now in one of my process, we need to Dial IVR and the enter DTMF digit and then it connects to the automated IVR. When I dial out the IVR directly using Xlite and VOIP Mins provider , it works perfectly. but when In try from

Hello, I'm noticing strange behavior in one of our Asterisk nodes where the ACK is always sent to the proxy, but RR is not enabled for calls. The proxy drops the ACK. I'm using the AMI interface to originate a call: Action: login Username: myusername Secret: mypassword Events: on Action: Originate Channel: SIP/<SOMENUMBER>@proxy1 CallerID: <SOMENUMBER> Application: Playback

Good day time! We've noticed the following issue with Samba 3.0.1 on Linux. When SMB client asks for the first time on FID for a locking or read request on an opened file, it causes an ACK to be sent from client side. Windows server also requests ACK BUT much more rarely. Sending ACK causes additional overhead when working in heavy locking and unlocking environment. Windows server

Good day time! We've noticed the following issue with Samba 3.0.1 on Linux. When SMB client asks for the first time on FID for a locking or read request on an opened file, it causes an ACK to be sent from client side. Windows server also requests ACK BUT much more rarely. Sending ACK causes additional overhead when working in heavy locking and unlocking environment. Windows server

I have two R objects, allDataSubset1 and allDataSubset2 and the str of both of them is shown below ( I don't show all 18 lists for space purposes ). The difference between them is that the times ( and possibly the days ) and the data is different and what I want to do is merge them so that only the data in Subset2 that is the same day and times as Subset 1 remains in the merged dataset.

IVR Number :17275691533 When I try it from xlite configuring my provider directly, it works perfectly. When I try to dial out from dialer , it doesnt work. [sip8] type=peer username=user fromuser=user authuser=user secret=password host=8.14.146.111 nat=no canreinvite=yes insecure=very disallow=all allow=g729 allow=ulaw context=default dtmfmode=rfc2833 What cld be the reason ? --------------

All, I'm recently seeing an issue with how Samba is reporting the disk space available from a NFS share. Checking the properties from a PC system displays all mapped network drives as having 20.0 MB size with zero free disk space available. We updated to Samba version 3.0.11 this morning with no change in results. I have checked the bug reports and haven't found anything that resembles

I have an X4500 fileserver (NFS, Samba) running OpenSolaris 2008.05 pkg upgraded to snv_91 with ~3200 filesystems (and ~27429 datasets, including snapshots). I''ve been encountering some pretty big slow-downs on this system when running certain zfs commands. The one causing me the most pain at the moment is setting the "sharenfs" property on a filesystem takes a little under 7

Full_Name: Adolfo Jiménez Pérez Version: 1.8.0 (2003-10-08) OS: Window'98 2ed Submission from: (NULL) (81.203.134.156) I've a crash when reading a specific file with the command: > read.table("file.dat") This file can be readed with the 1.1.1 version using the same command and R reads it correctly. The content file is this: ---->file beginning<---------

================================================================== "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself." Mark Twain ================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.1. Major enhancements in Samba 4.1.4

================================================================== "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself." Mark Twain ================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of Samba 4.1. Major enhancements in Samba 4.1.4