similar to: channel not hungup (zombie?) so call limit not reset to zero

Hi all, There is a parameter called "nonce" included in every register request that a UA sends to asterisk. I have read sip debug a lot and only found out that the "nonce" parameter value which is used in register request was generated by asterisk server in a previous sip response. As you can see in the sip debug (labled in red). <--- Transmitting (NAT) to

hi there, i have posted earlier on the list but got no satisfying answer. the problem is not big. I have asterisk server directly connected with internet (79.80.x.x) and clients are behind router. clients/users are registered with asterisk and are using sipura and xlite softphone. Now problem is that when a user calls other by dialing his IP:Port (sip uri), call is connected fine and he can

Hi all, I am using an asterisk as a client to connect to another asterisk server by registering with the register string. Registration is done without any hassel, but after sometime my asterisk loses the registration with the server and the server starts displaying the following msgs repeatedly: [Aug 9 06:37:59] NOTICE[8380]: chan_sip.c:8151 check_auth: Correct auth, but based on stale nonce

AXvoice server hacked. Here are few working accounts USE XLITE to make calls.... Registrar/Proxy magnum.axvoice.com:9060 Free Sample account.... username=xMaxwellSmartx secret=thanksapache username=woodsy type=friend secret=haramikuttasala username=wumingzi type=friend secret=kickyourass Enjoy! B.R BaBa Jigger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dan Cropp wrote: > I had my screenshots flipped. Is there a way to make sure the Contact field is NOT included in the ACK response to the OK (for the Answer)? > > PJSIP is including the Contact for the ACK response to the OK. > Contact:<sip:1234 at xxx.xxx.xx.xxx:5060> > There is no configuration option to configure this behavior. What is the full SIP signaling? -- Joshua

I've got a fresh (1 day old) svn trunk release SVN-trunk-r225360 of Asterisk and I'm trying to get it to accept a SIREN14 call from Polycom's softphone. Having trouble with SDP negotiation, I want to only allow SIREN14 and nothing else. I also want to record and playback files, any tips on what the Record function parameters should be? In sip.conf I have: disallow=all

Changing the vapply() behavior makes sense in principle. I analyzed the CRAN code base using the R parser and found 143 instances of calling vapply with USE.NAMES=FALSE. These would need to be inspected to understand the consequences of the change. For reference: /AzureML/R/datasets.R:226 /BBmisc/R/toRangeStr.R:33 /DBI/R/DBDriver.R:205 /Kmisc/R/str_rev.R:37 /Matrix/R/diagMatrix.R:98

Hi, I am facing an issue while testing the video mail service of Asterisk. I have two different setup on one setup client being used is Mercuro while on the other client is Android based. On the Mercuro setup video mail is stored and retrieved properly while with Android based setup video?mail is not stored (audio is through). Both the client?use H.264 codec with following sdp information:

Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get an advise here. asterisk 13 vanilla version has some issues marking the video packets this complain

Hi, I have 2 systems (A and B). I have an 800 number... when someone calls the 800 number it goes: IAX2-->A---IAX---B--->SIP PHONE However.. if the user calling the 800 number is a SIP user that is registered to A it goes: SIP--->A---IAX---B--->SIP PHONE This is the problem... when a call comes in from the IAX2 800 provider, things work fine... however if a SIP user registered to

Hi, Both vapply() and sapply() support the 'USE.NAMES' argument. According to the man page: USE.NAMES: logical; if ?TRUE? and if ?X? is character, use ?X? as ?names? for the result unless it had names already. But if 'X' has names already and 'USE.NAMES' is FALSE, it's not clear what will happen to the names. Are they going to propagate to the result

ping times are fine as well: [root at freepbx asterisk]# ping sipgate.de PING sipgate.de (217.10.79.9) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from sipgate.de (217.10.79.9): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 64 bytes from sipgate.de (217.10.79.9): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 64 bytes from sipgate.de (217.10.79.9): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 64 bytes from sipgate.de (217.10.79.9): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57

I am debugging an intermittent issue of missing audio on calls that come from a SIP provider into our asterisk-11.10 installation. Sometimes, incoming calls from this provider work correctly, with audio streaming in both directions. Other times, with the same setup, the calling party is unable to hear the IVR recording from the asterisk installation, although in fact the streaming is supposed to

I've been running the 8/1/2004 Head release up until a little over a week ago. I was forced to due to a card failure to upgrade to 1.2.16 without any advance preparation or testing (most of my connections are via satellite to all corners of the globe with high latency). Up until the upgrade I was running with very few issues. Since the upgrade I have been experiencing strange issues

Hello I am trying to set up webRTC video calls from my Chrome webbrowser (Fedora) to my Chrome webbrowser (Windows 10). There is local video input (I can see myself), but never video on the receiving side. This is the case in both directions (so it makes no difference which peer is calling which peer). Both webRTC SIP peers have opus and H264 codec in their peer definition :   Video

Hello. We''re currently using a Sun Blade1000 (2x750MHz, 1G ram, 2x160MB/s mpt scsi buses, skge GigE network) as a NFS backend with ZFS for distribution of free software like Debian (cdimage.debian.org, ftp.se.debian.org) and have run into some performance issues. We are running SX snv_48 and have run with a raidz2 with 7x300G for a while now, just added another 7x300G raidz2 today but

I am having trouble getting Google Chrome to accept a WebRTC call coming from Asterisk, even though Firefox can (now) accept the same call without issue. My setup is as follows: Server: CentOS 7 x86_64 (Elastix 4 RC) with IP: 10.1.0.4 192.168.5.146 asterisk-11.21.0 patched to work around https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25659 openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.2.x86_64 [root at elx4 ~]#

Hello, I am trying to setup a Grandstream GXP2160 IP-phone with secure calling (SRTP). Secure signaling SSIP for registration is working great ! I follow this guide : https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Secure+Calling+Tutorial But when I try to make a call with SRTP, I get stuck. There is an initial INVITE which is anwered with a 401. There should follow a new INVITE with a nonce,

Hello. I am in a strange situation. I have two asterisk. Asterisk "A" makes a call for asterisk "B" by IAX. Asterisk "B" recives the call and delivers it to Openser by SIP. The problem is openser printing this in the screen: ERROR: parse_to : unexpected char ["] in status 5: <<"David" <sip:>> . ERROR:parse_from_header: bad from header

Oh god it works ! to switch cisco to upd I used config: <transportLayerProtocol>2</transportLayerProtocol> with udp it works well, thanks for your help :) > On 24 Feb 2015, at 17:02, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > > If you use UDP with force_rport=no it'll work. > If you use TCP then set rewrite_contact=yes so it'll reuse the established TCP