similar to: Asterisk Home Automation (was: Re: 99 bottles of beer)

; *99: ; 99 bottles of beer on the wall. exten => *99,1,Noop(99 Bottles of beer on the wall) exten => *99,n,Answer() exten => *99,n,Set(bottles=99) exten => *99,n(loop),Noop(There are ${bottles} bottles of beer on the wall) exten => *99,n,SayNumber(${bottles}) exten => *99,n,Noop(Take one done and pass it round and there's) exten =>

Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:19:32 +0300 From: "Dovid B" < > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] phone as control interface (was 99 bottles of beer) To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <05bf01c7ebb8$6ff3ffc0$0a00a8c0 at DovidLaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;

-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:51 PM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 88 Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to asterisk-users at lists.digium.com

I tried asking in another thread this week, but I'm not sure people saw the actual subject of the question. Does anyone know where to find documentation of xPL, the home automation interface? Specifically for integrating it with Asterisk. xPL is part of Trixbox, so it's being used, but where is some expertise for using it without Trixbox? -- (C) Matthew Rubenstein

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > A while back I promised to provide some feedback on useful extensions to > LLVM to better support source language writers (i.e. those _using_ LLVM, > not developing it). Below is a list of the ideas I've come up with so > far. Cool! Ideas are alway welcome! > If you respond to this, please respond to each item in a separate >

Any one knows where to install chan_sccp for asterisk 1.4 ???????. Please guide me from where can I download the asterisk 1.4 sccp channel driver and how to install it because I tried to get chan_sccp-mayday05.tar.gz When I trying to install it ,error happened like this. Please help me how to solve this issue. [root@XPL t]# cd chan_sccp [root@XPL chan_sccp]# make clean rm -rf

A while back I promised to provide some feedback on useful extensions to LLVM to better support source language writers (i.e. those _using_ LLVM, not developing it). Below is a list of the ideas I've come up with so far. As I get more of XPL's compiler done, I'll start diving into each of the these areas. I'm posting early in the hopes that discussion will bear some fruit. In

The XPL compiler produced the attached OneOfEach.bc file without error or warning from either LLVM or XPLC. However when I llvm-dis the file, I get: llvm-dis: Failed value look-up for name 'entry' The Bytecode Reader prints this out when it can't find the associated value for the name. Obviously I botched something in the XPL compiler but I would have thought the verified would

Hi all, How does one set up different "bottles" like in Crossover office? Meaning how do I isolate an installation of Program A from Program B, when running under Wine? is that possible? That's a neat feature they have in Crossover, but I can't seem to find any documentation of how to do the samething in generic WINE. Robert

Soliciting your help on the following question ... XPL uses the UTF-8 encoding for its identifiers. As such it supports Unicode and many non-ASCII characters. LLVM uses std::string for identifiers which is based on a signed character which only supports 7-bit ASCII. Although the size of the characters in both schemes is the same, the bit encoding is different (UTF-8 is unsigned, ASCII is

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > The XPL compiler produced the attached OneOfEach.bc file without error > or warning from either LLVM or XPLC. However when I llvm-dis the file, I > get: > > llvm-dis: Failed value look-up for name 'entry' I'm guessing that 'entry' is a basic block? > The Bytecode Reader prints this out when it can't find the

I just found "entry". Its the name I gave a basic block at the start of the function (name was hard coded in the compiler, not the source). The issue here is probably that the block doesn't have a terminating instruction. However, that fact used to be caught well by the validator. Furthermore, the output from the byte code reader is a little confusing given the source of the

On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 11:12, Chris Lattner wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 1. Definition Import > > Source languages are likely to create lots of named type and value > > definitions for the memory objects the language manipulates. Redefining > > these in every module produces byte code bloat. It would be very useful

The plastics industry says polycarbonate bottles are safe. http://www.bisphenol-a.org/about/faq.html#g I'm sure Maggie and here friends would say ALL plastic bottles are very dangerous. This lady seems to be at a reasonable middle ground. http://trusted.md/blog/vreni_gurd/2007/03/29/plastic_water_bottles Polycarbonate plastics the kind of bottle you bought contains BPA. "In 2006 Europe

One of the things I use heavily in conjunction with LLVM is libxml2. This provides the XML parsing (amongst other things) that I need for my XPL source language. Since XPL supports XML parsing at runtime, I would like to be able to compile libxml2 to bytecode and have it undergo optimization as well. libxml2 is "C" code, well written and reasonably large. I'm wondering if it would

The SymbolTable is a map of Type* to a map of names to Value*. This means that in order to lookup something by name you first have to know what type it is. For the basic types this is fine because you generally always know which basic type you're after. But, for derived types, this can be quite complicated. It isn't always possible to know the exact type. In XPL, types are just names.

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 13:01, Vipin Gokhale wrote: > While on the subject of annotating bytecode with analysis info, could I > entice someone to also think about carrying other types of source-level > annotations through into bytecode ? This is particularly useful for > situations where one wants to use LLVM infrastructure for its > whole-program optimization capabilities,

Sorry about the lengthy post, I've searched high and lo for information on how to do this but now I need your help... ======== Brief intro on problem and requirements =========== I'm hoping to use Asterisk in a Home environment where I'd like to replace the current non-PC Answering Machine, and get added benefits such as IVR, and text to speeach, for Home Automation purposes.

Running fresh install of wheezy. dom0 is encrypted using LVM. After xen hypervisor starts, I then get to select my wheezy kernel. After starting that, it dies. Screen is black. Can''t see/do anything. Anyone ever managed to run xen on an encrypted dom0? Thanks -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer''s men seem to

Hi, Question on setting up networking in xen. I want to do the following on my laptop: dom0 is attached to eth0 and ath0. dom1 is going to by my virtual firewall for all my virtual machines. So I assume 3 interfaces, a bridge to eth0, ath0 and a virtual interface? dom2 and so on will route all their traffic through dom1 (through the virtual interface) I''ve read the documentation a