similar to: No subject

such file or directory" on pure-IP platform in which I installed asterisk-libpri-dahdi trilogy. Maybe, it's me while following README instructions, maybe README instructions could be improved or maybe it's wrongly labeled messages ? That's why I told myself : I'm waiting too much from doc ? is a pure-IP platform too specific ? what is the official policy ? README starts with

Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> said: > The FreeNAS Mini from iX Systems is a good deal more expensive, but > the ones I've worked with have been reliable and well suited to > running ZFS with good performance. I just retired a TrueNAS (the iX Systems "enterprise" version of FreeNAS, on hardware they sold pre-configured), and I don't

Hi, I am using Dovecot 1.0 beta 7, moving to beta8 probably tomorrow. I am seeing a few RFC compliance issues with IMAP responses. I have an in-house IMAP client that caches IMAP data for a web mail system (it parses millions of IMAP interactions a day), and it reports whenever it gets a line that does not look RFC compliant. Unfortunately, users modify their mailboxes before I can get a copy

I'm running MPE 5.5pp5 and am trying (again) to get Samba on there. Has anyone else done this? I looked at the survey page on the samba website and MPE/iX was not listed as a platform that anyone has registered a survey form for, so I wonder if no one is successful getting it loaded. Any assistance that can be provided will be gratefully and graciously accepted. TIA Howard Hoxsie HP3000

Anyone running 7.1 and using E1000 hardware that has the time, I would appreciate any testing you can do. This has an important fix for SuperMicro servers but any regression test of the code would be helpful. Backup the contents of /usr/src/sys/dev/e1000 and then overwrite with this tarball. Send feedback to me, Jack

Eve.8ryone, I have had a SuperMicro machine running Centos 5.8 that had been progressively updated with yum-cron from a 5.0 CD install. I upgraded the SuperMicro with more memory, switched out the CD with a DVD and tried to boot to the Centos x64 6.2 dvd. My plan was to test the memory before I added the hard drives, but I could not I could not get the machine to boot from the disc. I also

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:08:56 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > FWIW, I agree that the current situation with llvm-gcc is not ideal, but > most of us just build llvm-gcc once and forget about it. The real > solution here is to endow LLVM with its own C/C++ compiler and bootstap, > but that's a longer strategy. > > Reid. While I agree this would be the

Hello, I''ve setuped an ethernet bridge on a debian sarge 3.1 with l7-filter + ipp2 shapper rules The server is a supermicro p4sci + celeron pentium 4 base 3ghz + 512Mb + 2 ethernet e1000 One interface is connected to a cisco catalyst switch The other interface is connected directly to a CMTS (a sort of router for cable modem) configured as bridge too. More than 20Mbps of bandwith

# HG changeset patch # User David Hicks <david at hicks.id.au> # Date 1373085976 -36000 # Sat Jul 06 14:46:16 2013 +1000 # Node ID ccd83f38e4b484ae18f69ea08631eefcaf6a4a4e # Parent 1fbac590b9d4dc05d81247515477bfe6192c262c login-common: Add support for ECDH/ECDHE cipher suites ECDH temporary key parameter selection must be performed during OpenSSL context initialisation before ECDH and

On 2019-04-05 08:57, David B?rgin via dovecot wrote: > Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? > > In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot > doesn?t > have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by > another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was > the answer then, see >

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:23:03PM +0000, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > On 25 March 2016 at 04:11, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > As I understand it, the fundamental property being addresses here is: Are > > the semantics of scalar FP math the same as vector FP math? TTI seems like > > a good place to expose that information. If the semantics are indeed

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:08:56 -0700 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > FWIW, I agree that the current situation with llvm-gcc is not ideal, but > > most of us just build llvm-gcc once and forget about it. The real > > solution here is to endow LLVM with its own C/C++ compiler and bootstap, > > but

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Norbert Pocs wrote: > Hi OpenSSH mailing list, > > I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] > for > > FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 > > version. > > The patch targets OpenSSL support of OpenSSH, specifically the usage of > > old low level API. The new

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 1) Has anyone been able to get their AIC-9410 controller recognized in CentOS 5.3? I'm working with a Supermicro X7DBR-3 motherboard. It has 2 "ICH Raid Codebase" options in the Bios (Intel and Adaptec); neither of which seem to change Linux's behavior. The interesting part though, choosing either Adaptec or Intel, then performing

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0382030028==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <395305@bugs.debian.org> Subject: xen-utils-common: here is a small patch to correctly handle long domU names in parseln Message-ID: <20070317182707.16837.48971.reportbug@audhumbla.dengg.priv.at> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.31

Anyone have any experience/knowledge on the Supermicro P4SGA motherboard? Supermicro's tech support suggested that specific MB as a low latency board with a reasonable pci bus. Expect to use this with the Digium TDM fxo card. Comments?

Would it be sufficiant if I were to copy the makefile and res_config_ldap.c to the res/ directory of my running Asterisk and do make; make install? or do I have to do LIBS=-lldap export LIBS ./configure before that? My asterisk version is 1.2.6. Thanks in advance, Abhishek * * * * On 8/27/07, Gavin Henry <gavin.henry at gmail.com> wrote: > > I see it is res_config_ldap. You'd be

On Monday 29 September 2003 20:44, DarthPeter wrote: > Hi everyone, Hello, I'm CC-ing the bridge mailing list since there are more people on that one and they might be able to shed more light. > We are trying to build a powerful firewall that could handle > several hundred megabits of traffic and we are running into a problem > with it. We'd like to be able to accomplish

I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather than gigE. I've swapped ports and cables with a different server,

On 25 March 2016 at 04:11, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > As I understand it, the fundamental property being addresses here is: Are the semantics of scalar FP math the same as vector FP math? TTI seems like a good place to expose that information. If the semantics are indeed different, then the vectorizer would require fast-math flags in order to vectorize FP operations