similar to: Queues strategy "leastrecent"

Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and 1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2) [general] priorityjumping=yes With n+101: exten => 1337,1,Dial(SIP/zytek,5,Ttj) exten => 1337,102,Dial(SIP/zytek,${RINGTIME},${OPTIONS}) exten => 1337,n,Hangup -- Executing [1337 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/113-087a3000", "SIP/zytek|5|Ttj") in new stack -- Called zytek

Me again, another problem. As I said before, I have 2 lines going into "incoming" context. When client calls, I press Flash, client hears music on hold (only on voip line as said in previous post), when I get back and press Flash again to get back to my client I cannon hear him, but he hears me without problems. I have just tested in on the LAN, same situations, happens everytime.

Asterisk 1.4.6 at FreeBSD6.2-RELEASE Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. Is this normal behaviour? How to change this? Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial. -- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-08737000",

asterisk-1.4.7, Fedora 7, intel emt64 - nocona: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/alsa.conf': Found ALSA lib pcm_dsnoop.c:558:(snd_pcm_dsnoop_open) unable to open slave [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:365 alsa_card_init: snd_pcm_open failed: No such file or directory [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:481 soundcard_init: Problem opening alsa I/O devices == No sound

Hi, All, I have a question about agents and queues. Right now we have about 4 queues in our system. Some agents are in multiple queues. Our main queue is for technical support and it's by far our busiest queue as well. We have the autologoff feature set to 14 sec right now in the agents.conf file. The problem I'm running into is we don't want people in our sales queue (who are

Hi list: Is there any way, to set a common inter-queues leastrecent Strategy, i'm searching a Behaviour like this: 2 Queues Q1 and Q2 2 Agentes A1 and A2 Both agents are in both queues. First Call in the system is for Q1 and is answer by A1 The next call in the system is for Q2, both agents are free, the system deliver

Hello list, I have successfully set up Asterisk, but girls from our office complain to me that when they hit Flash to transfer a call and pick the number, they need to wait until the call is answered, and only then they could hangup. On the analog PBX we had before the transfer was in "background", and if called party did not answer the call, then the call returned to the girl in the

Hello all, this is my first post here. Sorry for my english. Gentoo LAN router, 2.4.26-hardened-r2 There are 2 WAN links, one LAN link. I am doing some iptables/routing/tc magic in my scripts. What''s interesting is marking packets traveling from all IP''s in LAN. Interesting commands are: ------------- for ip in `seq 50`; do $IPTABLES -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth2 -d

Seeing as the "leastrecent" strategy does not work for us (it will *always* call the leastrecent agent, even if that agent is busy, and will not move to the next agent) I thought I'd try the roundrobin strategy. This seemed to work - however, I had my supervisor telling me today that a certain agent seemed to be getting most of the calls - and when I checked, out of 50 inbound

Hi there, I'm experiencing some problems accessing some of the services on llvm.org: $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk svn: E200029: Couldn't perform atomic initialization https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24734: "undef error - DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Got error 28 from storage engine" On Linux, errno 28 corresponds with ENOSPC, so my suspicion

First of all I would like to thank Mark for getting roundrobin to go roundrobin. Good job. Now we have some options here for leastrecent and fewestcalls strategy. It needs some work on the logic and Mark recommend that I ask the list and get some input before he makes any changes to it. fewestcalls from what I have seen would always ring the agent with the fewestcalls first then go into

Dear all, I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here have done exactly what i want. Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my eth1 is not restrciting total bandwidth at 100kbps. According to search on google imq is the solution.

I was trying to install iproute2-2.2.4. I get an error when i run the makefile. I get a parse error in /usr/include/arpa/inet.h. Can someone help me? Thanks. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

On Sep 12, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Ed Schouten <ed at nuxi.nl> wrote: >> >> ---- end --- > > Just to make sure I get this straight, I can substitute 'this > Software' by the names of components provided by the LLVM project. This is the literal license text that will be included with each of these projects, so no, you cannot literally make that substitution.

Hi folks. Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network using HTB. I have 2 clients: PC1: 192.168.100.2 PC2: 192.168.100.3 Server: 192.168.100.1 This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet. It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has

This is essentially the same as the previous JDK release, except that ServerSocket's didn't correctly set SO_REUSEADDR, causing some programs to fail. Note, the Multicast bug still exists in FreeBSD, which cause multicast programs to fail. See the FreeBSD Java WWW page for more information: http://www.freebsd.org/java Finally, there is still no ftp access to the JDK (yet). Until

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3221 Bug ID: 3221 Summary: hostkey preference ordering is broken in some situations Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh