similar to: Dial out through multiple Zap groups

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 01:22:16PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > If (((OSYS <= 0x07D9) || ((OSYS == 0x07DF) && (_REV == > 0x05)))) > { The OSYS comes from this (in DSDT): If (_OSI ("Windows 2009")) { OSYS = 0x07D9 } If (_OSI ("Windows

Hi, There are some generated Sparc assembly code like this: main: ! @main ! BB#0: save %sp, -112, %sp sethi 0, %l0 or %g0, 5, %l1 st %l0, [%fp+-4] st %l1, [%fp+-8] st %l1, [%fp+-12] sethi %hi(.L.str), %l1 ld [%fp+-8], %o1 add %l1, %lo(.L.str), %l1 or %g0, %l1, %o0 call printf nop ld [%fp+-12], %o2 ld [%fp+-8], %l2 sethi %hi(.L.strQ521), %l3 add

Dear all, In order to be sure I understand glmm correctly, I try to reproduce by hand a simple result. Here is a reproducible code. The questions are in _________________ Of course I have tried to find the solution using internet but I was not able to find a solution. I have also tried to follow glmer but it is very complicated code! Thanks for any help. Marc # Generate set of df with nb

Nick, Do you happen to know why the version reported in 'dwarfdump --eh-frame' for object files now differs when compiled with and without -g? The test used in FSF gcc's configure produces a diff of.. % diff -u conftest.o.g.stripped.dwarfdump conftest.o.g0.stripped.dwarfdump --- conftest.o.g.stripped.dwarfdump 2015-04-10 21:43:15.000000000 -0400 +++

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:52:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:18 AM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Karol, > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:26:45PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:50 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas at kernel.org> wrote: > > > >

In theory, compiler should generate bit-identical code with and without debug info. I.e. # clang -c -O2 -g a.cc -o a.g.o # clang -c -O2 -g0 a.cc -o a.g0.o # strip a.g.o a.g0.o # diff a.g.o a.g0.o The diff should find two binaries identical. For brevity, in the rest of the mail, I'll refer to this requirement as "codegen consistency" (any better name?) Unfortunately, LLVM does not

Hello. I have been trying to check, how llvm works on Solaris recently. First I have tested lli, whitch seems to execute the bytecode generated on Linux without any problems. However, llc has failed to generate valid SPARC assembler code even on the helloworld example. Here is the generated code: sakharov at trillian:~$ cat ./test.s .text .align 16 .globl main

Hi, all: Recently I am debugging the DSA and want to learn how it work, and now I am checking the local datastructure analysis. I use the following command to print the graph: (gdb) p g.dump() digraph DataStructures { label="Function addG"; Node0xe1f3a0 [shape=record,shape=Mrecord,label="{ i32: MRE\n|{<g0>}}"]; Node0xe1f4d0

Full_Name: Michael Chajewski Version: 2.9.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (150.108.71.185) I was programming a routine which kept reducing the array from which a random sample was taken, resulting in a single number. I discovered that when R attempts to sample from an object with only one number it does not reproduce/report the number but instead chooses a random number between 1 and

Hello list, I'm experimenting with a little GlusterFS cluster on debian wheezy: === snip === muzzy:~# cat /etc/debian_version wheezy/sid muzzy:~# dpkg -l | grep gluster ii glusterfs-client 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (client package) ii glusterfs-common 3.2.6-1 GlusterFS common libraries and translator modules ii glusterfs-server 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (server package) === snip

In my quest to actually send a fax, I'm now stuck trying to send the confirm. First I send the fax: -- Executing [send at outbound-fax:2] System("Console/dsp", "env echo -e "Channel:DAHDI/g0/12036378447\\nContext:fax-tx\\nExtension: s\\nPriority: 1\\n" >/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/call-1254012878.0") in new stack -- Auto fallthrough, channel

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:30:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:36 AM Mika Westerberg > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:39:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 8:49 PM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg at intel.com> wrote: > > > >

Hello. I have a very simple code like this: int sum(int i, int j) { int k; k = i + j; } #ifdef LINUX #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main () { int k; k = sum(3,4); return k; } #endif If I emit this to SPARC assembly mnemonics through LLVM, it is shown as follows

Hi, I'm quite new to R and are stuck with the following problem. Lets say I have a column consisting of a 1 and the rest zero's, called G0. G0 <- c(1,rep(0,5)) Now what I would like to do is to generate G1 from G0, and G2 from G1 etc... Just for the simplicity, let's say I need the first entry of the column to be increased by 5 each time. How could I do this? Thanks already!

Dear R-helpers, I am using confint() within a function, and I want to turn off the message it prints: x <- rnorm(100) y <- x^1.1+rnorm(100) nlsfit <- nls(y ~ g0*x^g1, start=list(g0=1,g1=1)) > confint(nlsfit) Waiting for profiling to be done... 2.5% 97.5% g0 0.4484198 1.143761 g1 1.0380479 2.370057 I cannot find any way to turn off 'Waiting for. .." I tried

I found this tracing a bug when experimenting with a new sort() function using match.arg(). It was triggered because mosaicplot.default(.) has an argument called `sort' and calls itself the sort() function in which I was using match.arg()... Here is (input for) a small clean example : #### bad match.arg() // sys.function() bug : #### MM, 22.3.2002 callme <- function(a = 1, mm =

Hey all, I have a situation where I have 8 lines from the phone company in a hunt group coming in to my asterisk box. These are the same lines I'm using for outgoing calls ( named g0 ). The problem arises when someone dials our number at the same time asterisk tries to put a call out on one of the zap channels in the g0 group. This has happened twice that I know of so far, once to

I've installed a TDM400. Having a go with AMP. I would like incoming calls to be put throuhg to an extension (at my desk) and a mobile (cell phone) at the same time. Whichever picks up, gets the call.. This should be possible with AMP (call groups, 200|201|0*0408xxxxxx), but it didn't work, so I have created a custom-incoming in extensions-custom.conf What is happening is, The extension

I have a Asterisk @home ver 1.0 running with a TDMB11 card. Several sip extensions and a regular phone connected to the box. All routing works fine from the regular phone connected to the box, whether its going to FWD, broadvoice or the PSTN. The problem I am experiencing comes from making calls from the sip phones. They get routed correctly to the sip and iax trunks but when making calls

Dear Tianwei, You can use the -analyze option to the opt tool to tell the DSA passes to store their results in files. When you use the -analyze option, the DSA passes will create a separate file for each function (and possible one file to hold the globals graph). For this reason, I recommend running opt in a special empty directory because DSA will generate *a lot* of files. Second, to