similar to: Does Asterisk support STUN or TURN? How to configure asterisk NAT traversal?

Hello, I have a problem with a Grandstream being behind a symmetric nat. The box which does the nat is a german "Fritz Box". This one does nat for the internal network. In the internal network is a Granstream BudgeTone 100. The nat router has a dial-up connection, so ip changes on every dial-in. |------------| |------------| |--------| |Grandstream

At 7:36 PM +0200 on 5/22/04, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >>[snip] >Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk >can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points >out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything. > >The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable. > >Another problem with the SIPURA is

Sipura does include STUN as an option. It has for quite some time. We are using it with all of our Sipuras behind NAT'd gateways and it works great! Try upgrading to the latest Sipura firmware rev. Darren Nay > -----Original Message----- > From: John Todd [mailto:jtodd@loligo.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 1:57 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject:

Hi List, After some research, it seems the only reasonable thing to do in order to get SIP phones behind NAT working reasonably well without fiddling with the DSL router is to have some kind of far end nat traversal mechanism. Is there any way to do this with open source tools? I've seen somewhere that far end nat traversal can be achieved with SER + nathelper does the job... has anybody

Hi, I am trying to register SIP clients which are behind NAT on different network. In order to achieve this goal I think I need STUN Server . I downloaded STUN Server from http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stun/stund_0.96_Aug13.tgz But I don't know how to install/configure it. And please advice me that STUN server is good idea for this scenario? Thanks in advance Wazb

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040715/b37cee4b/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- ? Hi friends I have some doubt in connecting my firefly3rd party softphone from windows machine to asterisk server in linux . My asterisk is behind the "Port Restricted NAT". I am using STUN server to cross the

I decided to give the whole family IP phones for christmas, all hooked into my asterisk server, so all the nephews can have their own lines. However, one of the phones I got was the SNOM 200. That's worked fine for me on my own network, but I'm having bad luck getting it to work behind NAT talking to Asterisk. It talks to my termination/origination provider, which seems to ruthlessly

You will also need your SIP clients that are behind the same NAT to support ICE (Interactive Connectivty Establishment) if you want calls between them. Xten Eyebeam and Snom phones are the only ones I'm aware of that support it. On 7/5/05, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez@redvoiss.net> wrote: > And even worst. > There are some kind of NAT that STUN does not work. > You can check

HI all! I'm looking for some infos to configure stun server support for a SIP peer. I've installed Asterisk 1.4.3, but searching for stun support in chan_sip (sip.conf) i've found nothing, only a "misterious" externip = stun... But where i have to put the ip of stun server? No infos around Google and forum! :-) Thank all, regards -- Marco Ciacci Asterisk Admin Windows

Guys. Im reading a lot about ser, nat, stun, etc. And I noticed there are a lot of ways to get around nat but I would like to hear some success stories about handling nat users with multiple voip phones behind nat. I have my asterisk box behind but ports are forwarded (5060 5004 10000-20000 for rtp and 4569 for iax2) but still.. I can quite figure out what ser and stund have to do on this

Cisco devices (7912, ata-168, 7960 etc.) don't support STUN. However, they do let you define a static external NAT IP address, and parameters to send a keep-alive out through the NAT on a regular basis. However, I want to make these devices work in an environment where they are behind a NAT which has a dynamic IP which might change (though in fact it changes only rarely.) They're

How can one measure the effect of NAT traversal packet loss? We currently have no solution for NAT traversal for our SIP clients. There is no doubt that packets are getting lost. What is not clear is how much damage this does. On the face of it, everything seems fine. Could this be so? Perhaps we're suffering a degradation in quality or our call setup times could be improved. How can we

Hi there! David has put up a patch to fix the STUN issues that has plagued Asterisk 1.6 ever since that feature was introduced. Now we need testers to verify the patch, so please grab the patch (or check out the SVN branch) and add your comments: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17622 Thanks, Philipp

Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here??? compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for a long time and then just craps out. Here is my config:/etc/sysconfig/stund #!/bin/echo Not to execute. # Path to stund STUND=/usr/sbin/stund # Set the required args for STUND STUNDPRIMARYHOSTNAME=208.x.x.x # The hostname

It seems to me that ipsecnat tunnel type is not complete. Latest drafts of ipsec nat-traversal use udp port 4500 for nat-traversal communications. (It''s called port floating). That is needed to get rid of ugly ipsec passthru devices. Now ipsecnat opens port udp/500 from any source port. And I think ipsecnat won''t work at all with gw zone defined? I''m not sure about

> Joshua Colp wrote: > > There should be nothing different, except for how you configure things. > What is the full PJSIP configuration? What is the environment where > Asterisk is running? Is ICE actually in use on the other side? What is > the full SIP trace? > The full configuration is here: http://pastebin.com/XqZG1m5X I am connection over TLS / SRTP on port 5063. When

I'm wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I'm mostly interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if your recommendations are within the open source arena. Basically, I contemplated the idea of using SER as a NAT Helper and possibly as a SIP server for a portion of our user base. We prefer to have Asterisk in the mix because of the additional

Good day all I cant get my grandstream bt-100 to register My asterisk is on a public ip and the phone behind a nat firewall I added nat=yes in sip.conf and did this on my grandstream set the GS to "SIP server=asterisk.yourhost.com" and leave "Outbound Proxy" empty * set the GS to SIP port 5060 and RTP port 5004 (and "Use random port=No") * set the GS to

Is anybody aware of a database containing the types of nat implementation in todays soho/consumer routers? I think it would make sense for the community to have this database in order to avoid symmetric nats. If one such thing does not exist how about starting this database? A stunclient for linux can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun/ I can contribute this information for two

I have two phones, one does not need stun, the other one needs. All settings are identically, except the number/password and said above stun - not stun I use codec in the order: g729 g711u g711a Any ideas, why the user can hear me, but I cannot hear him (stun) while the other user without stun has no problem. bye Ronald