similar to: Not hearing the caller after 2 x Flash

Asterisk 1.4.6 at FreeBSD6.2-RELEASE Client hears pure silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. Is this normal behaviour? How to change this? Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial. -- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-08737000",

Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and 1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2) [general] priorityjumping=yes With n+101: exten => 1337,1,Dial(SIP/zytek,5,Ttj) exten => 1337,102,Dial(SIP/zytek,${RINGTIME},${OPTIONS}) exten => 1337,n,Hangup -- Executing [1337 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/113-087a3000", "SIP/zytek|5|Ttj") in new stack -- Called zytek

Hello list, I have successfully set up Asterisk, but girls from our office complain to me that when they hit Flash to transfer a call and pick the number, they need to wait until the call is answered, and only then they could hangup. On the analog PBX we had before the transfer was in "background", and if called party did not answer the call, then the call returned to the girl in the

asterisk-1.4.7, Fedora 7, intel emt64 - nocona: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/alsa.conf': Found ALSA lib pcm_dsnoop.c:558:(snd_pcm_dsnoop_open) unable to open slave [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:365 alsa_card_init: snd_pcm_open failed: No such file or directory [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:481 soundcard_init: Problem opening alsa I/O devices == No sound

Hi, I've recently upgraded Asterisk to the latest version 1.4.9 on a PBX that manages several queues, but at least on one queue strategy (leastrecent) it doesn't seem to be distributing the calls has it should. I think this strategy should work like this: a) Make a list of available agents and their idle time (time since last call) and

Hi, All, I have a question about agents and queues. Right now we have about 4 queues in our system. Some agents are in multiple queues. Our main queue is for technical support and it's by far our busiest queue as well. We have the autologoff feature set to 14 sec right now in the agents.conf file. The problem I'm running into is we don't want people in our sales queue (who are

Hello all, this is my first post here. Sorry for my english. Gentoo LAN router, 2.4.26-hardened-r2 There are 2 WAN links, one LAN link. I am doing some iptables/routing/tc magic in my scripts. What''s interesting is marking packets traveling from all IP''s in LAN. Interesting commands are: ------------- for ip in `seq 50`; do $IPTABLES -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth2 -d

Hi there, I'm experiencing some problems accessing some of the services on llvm.org: $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk svn: E200029: Couldn't perform atomic initialization https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24734: "undef error - DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Got error 28 from storage engine" On Linux, errno 28 corresponds with ENOSPC, so my suspicion

Correct me if I''m wrong, I just want to help my friend who needs a tc solution with fairness to hosts on a 512K/s DSL line, but few of them should be restricted to 64K/s I thought about htb + esfq (sfq with ip based fairness, not connection) parent class with CEIL=500Kbit (no RULE? see *1) and attached esfq to this parent class, now child class with CEIL=64Kbit and RULE=10.0.0.1

What I need to do: shape every user on my LAN to 256Kbit -- class for web trafiic with rate X ceil 256Kbit -- class for other(p2p) traffic with rate 1Kbit ceil 200Kbit This is good because even if they have p2p programs running they will always have fast web surfing. I can do it with bash scripts - one class per ip with 2 children. But I wonder if something like this would work: # class

I was trying to install iproute2-2.2.4. I get an error when i run the makefile. I get a parse error in /usr/include/arpa/inet.h. Can someone help me? Thanks. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

Dear all, I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here have done exactly what i want. Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my eth1 is not restrciting total bandwidth at 100kbps. According to search on google imq is the solution.

On Sep 12, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Ed Schouten <ed at nuxi.nl> wrote: >> >> ---- end --- > > Just to make sure I get this straight, I can substitute 'this > Software' by the names of components provided by the LLVM project. This is the literal license text that will be included with each of these projects, so no, you cannot literally make that substitution.

Hi folks. Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network using HTB. I have 2 clients: PC1: 192.168.100.2 PC2: 192.168.100.3 Server: 192.168.100.1 This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet. It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3221 Bug ID: 3221 Summary: hostkey preference ordering is broken in some situations Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Hi All, Does anyone know of a way to limit the speed of *individual* TCP sessions, but without placing any overall bandwidth limits, and without requiring an explicit QoS entry for every ip address the machine is communicating with ? The scenario is a mailserver - say you want to limit individual TCP sessions (pop3, smtp etc) to no more than 512Kbit so that an individual session

Hi Hans, 2016-07-30 0:57 GMT+02:00 Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the > real testing started to see where we're at. Just to double-check, is this bug also on people's radar? It causes Clang to crash when trying to build a fair number of Open Source packages/libraries. In my

This is essentially the same as the previous JDK release, except that ServerSocket's didn't correctly set SO_REUSEADDR, causing some programs to fail. Note, the Multicast bug still exists in FreeBSD, which cause multicast programs to fail. See the FreeBSD Java WWW page for more information: http://www.freebsd.org/java Finally, there is still no ftp access to the JDK (yet). Until