similar to: awful list delays: 4 days!

Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev list seems fine! Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Wow. My message made it to the list after more than 3 hours. Philipp -- amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones. Asterisk? -> http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Stefan Wintermeyer Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

I can ping the google.com ip addresses (209.85.231.104) but can't ping the FQDN, obviously DNS is broken. I can also ping the nameserver ip addresses specified in /etc/resolv.conf. -- Gaurav On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Gaurav Nangla <gaurav.knangla at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I've setup a Centos 5.4 (x86_64) box in a VM recently; the trouble is I just >

how to adjust voice volume for sipura 2000 and cisco ata186?

Any ideas? This one would make the 10th email received. Return-Path: <centos-bounces at centos.org> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx192.postini.com [64.18.3.171]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id p2LKkur4025229 for <jpyeron at pdinc.us>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:46:57 -0400 Received: from source ([72.26.200.202]) by exprod8mx192.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with

Every time I post to the list I get the following response indicating that there is a mail loop. the recipient maxx@digital-system.it has some problems with looping. Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtp.register.it. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

Hi guys, This should be has an easy answer for you, my users are complaining that when they press # and then ear gorgeous Allison "Transfer" the timeout is very small, they must enter immediatly the extension to transfer the call. Is it possible to change this? ;transferdigittimeout => 3 ; Number of seconds to wait between digits when transfering a call This is timeout

Hi, I have this setup: (PSTN E1 PRI) -- Asterisk -- (crosscable) -- Alcatel PBX --- analog phones and a few of VoIP phones directly connected to Asterisk. Calling a number (only one until now!) - an automatic responder (IVR) - from VoIP phones works, from analog phones doesn't work: NOANSWER after a few seconds. I'm using no 'r' in dial options (this caused a problem with an IVR

My SIP seems to be configured correctly as I can dial out and my minutes show up on my broadvoice bill, but whenever anyone calls my broadvoice # inbound they just get a busy signal. I dont get anything in the logs saying anything came in from broadvoice at all. Has anyone had this/simmilar problem with inbound from Broadvoice? Any suggestions? Thanks Neri -------------- next part

Hi! I have a E1 PRI connected to my TE400P card on span 1, and two channelbanks on span 3 and 4 and * 1.2. Every few hours I get this message and asterisk dies just after that: Warning: No D-channels available! Using Primary on channel 16 anyway! When this happens restarting zaptel and asterisk services, generally puts the system back online my zaptel.con reads: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3

Hello, I have a 4 port FXO digium card with 3 PSTNs attached to it and AsteriskAtHome setup. Everything is working fine except outbound calls. When I dial a outside number, it works fine, but when another employee trys to dial out while I am on a line, it will not go. I have a outgoing route setup in the AMP interface. Dial Pattern: 1NXXNXXXXXX NXXNXXXXXX NXXXXXX Trunk

We have tried Asterisk 1.0.9 on FC4 and have never been able to get CAPI (with Fritz card, fcpci) to work properly. Apart from that Asterisk works fine in switching internal calls. But it's useless if we can't make outgoing calls on our ISDN line. We are considering abandoning FC4 for Debian or SuSe. What is the general concensus on the best Linux to run Asterisk with CAPI? /Why Tea

Say I have agents using a softphone like eyebeam that has 6 lines. They log in to the queue. Say there are 3 agents in my queue. 3 calls come in and all three agents are on a call. Now a fourth call comes in. Is it possible to have it setup so that the 4 call rings on line 2 of one of my agents, if they don't get it within the time limit it rings on line 2 of another agent and so on. An

Previously, when our server received an email it would slap the rcpt to in the received headers by adding a for <...> any ideas what has changed? Any pointers would be grateful. Headers received today: Return-Path: <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx220.postini.com [64.18.3.120]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://www.silvervalley.k12.ca.us/index.php/195 for more details. This isn't spam? Please forward this message to postmaster@silvervalley.k12.ca.us with a request that the e-mail address you received this from be whitelisted. Content preview: Hi! Anyone know

I run thunderbird (both 3.x and 5.x) against dovecot 2.x and frequently see delays "loading message". I admit to having a very large mailbox and running multiple imap clients. I've turned on thunderbird debugging, and at least one pattern I see in the log during the delays (maybe a minute long) is the failed protocol message above. These are no the only delays, but are the ones

>From Discussion-owner@paperboy.global.avidww.com Mon Mar 12 12:01:46 2007 Received: from softgate2.softimage.com (roundrobin.global.avidww.com [172.24.33.31]) by paperboy.global.avidww.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id l2CH1k5I028475 for <discussion@softimage.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:01:46 -0500 Received: from psmtp.com

Asterisk as a phone system makes perfect sense in a condo. You can get all the DID's you want and eliminate costs for the owners. You can offer standard FXO for people who don't care and IP sets for people who want to "upgrade" to feature sets. Your door openner is a piece of cake. 1. Create an option in your dialplan only in the "from-access-door" context that reads

Annoying :( S. -----Original Message----- From: Mail Delivery System [mailto:postmaster@bembang.com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:06 AM To: stormp@telus.net Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (HiveMail). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one of its recipients: sysad The error

Hello, sorry for beeing off-topic here. But can anyone confirm that there is a problem reverse resolving lists.digium.com (216.207.245.17) ? Because of this problem, my mail server will not accept mails from lists.digium.com (it is configured to accept valid DNS only). Armin