similar to: Branch differences

I am attempting to use an IAX2 channel between two Asterisk systems. This would seem to be a normal thing to do. I actually want to trunk traffic between the two that are in remote locations. However, I have started with what I think is a simple configuration, which should allow for one way calling. Attached are the pertinent parts of my configuration files. I am attempting to place a call on

I am new at this. I have read "Asterisk: The Future of Telephony" and have installed AsteriskNOW (beta 4, due to the dual processor problem in beta 5). The GUI interface does not seem to provide the capability that I need, although I have modified the *.conf files to successfully create what I need. Given this, I would like to install Asterisk on a distro. I am most familiar with

In looking at the safe_asterisk script, it would appear that it is encouraging the running of the Asterisk application as root user. My natural inclination is to run it as a non-privileged user. What is recommendation? +++++++++++++ This e-mail was checked by the TecInfo Content Scanning Service for potentially harmful content, such as viruses or Spam For more information, call 800.863.5415

From: Malcom Kemp Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:19 AM To: 'asterisk-users@lists.digium.com' Subject: AsteriskNOW generation of zapata.conf file I am a new user of Asterisk, and an trying to use AsteriskNOW. The test system is dual processor, so I am using the beta 4 version. I am currently trying to manually configure, as the GUI does not seem to let me accomplish what I need.

Thanks to all that have helped me so far. I have made a lot of progress. I am able to make prilib and zaptel. Now to Asterisk... After installing the kernel source, I have: # cd /usr/src/linux # make cloneconfig # make prepare-all Then I have run ./configure in the asterisk-1.4.4 directory. I have: # make clean # make Which goes through a number of compiles and then ends

I am installing asterisk on a second box with OpenSuSE 10.2. I have installed libpri, run menuselect/configure and then make. The make stops at the last line shown below. Looking at the processes, the current process is running sed. Not sure from where. Any ideas? ... checking for ar... /usr/bin/ar checking for cp... /bin/cp checking for ln... /bin/ln checking for mkdir... /bin/mkdir

(missed one thing) I have made some changed to your config: extensions.conf from 192.168.253.21: ; ; Create an extension, 205, for trunk ; exten => 205,1,Dial(IAX2/ <mailto:IAX2/192.168.253.20/205@iax-trunk> tecinfo1/205) iax.conf from 192.168.253.21: [tecinfo1] type=peer username=tecinfo2 secret=secret host=192.168.253.20

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Hello, > > While instrumenting LLVM IR in ThreadSanitizer (race detector), I need > to distinguish between a store to vtable pointer (vptr) and any other > regular store. > This special treatment should be limited to class DTORs, so I should also > know when a function is a DTOR. >

On Mar 19, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Hello, > > While instrumenting LLVM IR in ThreadSanitizer (race detector), I need to distinguish between a store to vtable pointer (vptr) and any other regular store. > This special treatment should be limited to class DTORs, so I should also know when a function is a DTOR. > Rationale: need to distinguish benign and

Hello, While instrumenting LLVM IR in ThreadSanitizer (race detector), I need to distinguish between a store to vtable pointer (vptr) and any other regular store. This special treatment should be limited to class DTORs, so I should also know when a function is a DTOR. Rationale: need to distinguish benign and harmful races on vptr (

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > Hello, > > While instrumenting LLVM IR in ThreadSanitizer (race detector), I need > to distinguish between a store to vtable pointer (vptr) and any other > regular store. > This special treatment should be limited to class

Am I doing something wrong? I can't get this dial command to timeout.... Dial(Zap/g1/xxxxxxx,20) -- Gary White admin@netpathway.com Network Administrator Internet Pathway 105 D East Church Street Voice: 601-776-3355 P. O. Box 777 Fax: 601-776-2314 Quitman, MS 39355

Guys, I have a problem that I can seem to run down. I'm running CVS-HEAD-09/10/04-18:14:15 on a Celeron 500 with an Intel chipset motherboard. The audio from my GS phone to * is sometimes decoded at about twice the normal speed on some outgoing calls. Also.when recordind a message to * from the GS it also does the same. This happens about 1 out of every 5 records or calls. This only

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > Hello, > > While instrumenting LLVM IR in ThreadSanitizer (race detector), I need > to distinguish between a store to vtable pointer (vptr) and any other > regular store. > This special treatment should be limited to class

Hello, We have a publication in ASPLOS 2012 that uses the LLVM infrastructure. Is it possible to add this to the publications web page: http://llvm.org/pubs/ ? Publication: Data Races vs. Data Race Bugs: Telling the Difference with Portend Link: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2150997 Abstract: Even though most data races are harmless, the harmful ones are at the heart of some of the worst

On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:19:52PM +0400, LRN wrote: > > In a test on a Core 2 machine with gcc-4.6.3, i686 flac build with > > nasm enabled is about 7% faster in decoding than without nasm. > > x86_64 build is about 2% faster than the i686 build with nasm > > enabled. > > > Was that with -O2 or -O3? Not sure, I didn't set CFLAGS which seems to result in

El 07/05/12 13:37, Miroslav Lichvar escribi?: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:19:52PM +0400, LRN wrote: >>> In a test on a Core 2 machine with gcc-4.6.3, i686 flac build with >>> nasm enabled is about 7% faster in decoding than without nasm. >>> x86_64 build is about 2% faster than the i686 build with nasm >>> enabled. >>> >> Was that with -O2 or

The LLVM 2.8 branches have been created! We will be conducting several rounds of testing of this branch during September. See http://llvm.org/ for a tentative schedule. What this means for you As I mentioned in a previous e-mail, the branch is still open for code submissions. However there are a few rules that we need to adhere to: No new features are allowed, no matter how trivial they may be.

I ran into a problem today when using a conditional for sub-setting a data.frame and tracked it down to a difference in behavior between the treatment of NA when sub-setting matrices and data.frames. A self-contained example is below followed by sessionInfo(). I'm not questioning the documentation of the behavior, but the rationale for its existence. Could someone explain to me why the

Guys, This is not really a bug but a question. When starting *, using the -c and entering a running *, using the -r command, you get color text. But, when starting * with no option, as I have it automatically do from the rc.init scripts, entering *, with the -r command, * does not have color text. Why? -- Gary White admin@netpathway.com Network