Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Remote Phone and Server Behind NAT"
2005 Jun 09
2
Is it possible to have a remote Phone work behind Nat without a VPN?
Hi Everyone,
Is it possible to have a SIP Phone work remotely if it's behind a Router
performing NAT without connecting the Router to a VPN? The Asterisk Box
will be in the DMZ.
Thanks
Dan
CYTEXONE
----
Dan Levine
dan@cytexone.com
CYTEXONE | Your Technology Specialists R
877.CYTEXONE x 810
212.477.0990 x 810
212.208.6889 FAX
502 Laguardia Place, Suite 2B
New York, NY 10012
2009 Jun 15
6
Spork and Merb and rSpec
Andy Shipman wrote:
> When running spork on a merb application, whenever a spec is run I get
> the following error from the Spork server.
>
> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/merb-core-1.0.11/lib/merb-core/bootloader.rb:1358:
> [BUG] rb_gc_mark(): unknown data type 0x3c(0x2203d0) non object
> ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-08 patchlevel 173) [i686-darwin9]
>
> Which crashes the
2008 Aug 08
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, David Shipman <dshipman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
> include path)
> error. Any idea what's happening here?
>
No. :-( Could you try Mike's suggestion? (Replicated here)
Try adding:
#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
to limitx.h like so:
#ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
+#define
2009 Jul 15
4
duplicate data points on a line graph
Hi,
I am new to R plot. I am trying to increase the data point
observation when duplicate data points exist
x y
1 10
1 10
2 3
4 5
9 8
in the about example 1, 10 would be displayed larger than the other
data points. Could someone give me some assistance with this problem
757-864-7114
LARC/J.L.Shipman/jshipman
Jeffery.L.Shipman at nasa.gov
2008 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
Mike's suggestion seems to fix the problem - happy to use it,
although my impression is that it shouldn't be necessary?
-David Shipman
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, David Shipman <dshipman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no
2006 Dec 14
3
[LLVMdev] ThisCall / Compilation problems
Hi all,
A few things.
Firstly, I've got a working implementation of the X86ThisCall calling
convention, but I'm unsure how to go about submitting it.
(I'm not really sure how to go about creating patch files etc, but would
like to contribute to the project).
Also, I'm using MS Visual C++ Express, and there are a few things that stop
llvm1.9 (and the current CVS release) from
2010 May 21
1
tinc confused on remote nodes behind NAT?
Something tells me this was covered recently, but i didn't find it again in
gmail. The nodes see each other but if i have something misconfigured that
is decreasing my speed.
All my nodes are behind NATs.
i have a remote node that connects to a central node via port forwarding
from public port 7777 to hp821 running on port 655.
remoteNode ----> public ip 1.2.3.4:7777 ---->
2006 Jan 12
0
How to register a SIP phone on Asterisk behind NAT
I currently do this for about 30 different cisco 79xx's connecting to
some hosted Asterisk servers.
Asterisk listens by default for any SIP connection on UDP port 5060.
And will use RTP UDP port 10000 to 20000
The phones use UDP Port 5061 for incoming connections (from Asterisks or
other SIP Devices) and use for RTP, UDP port 10000 to 20000.
Now, if you are going to have the two remote
2010 Sep 27
2
SCCP (skinny) phone behind NAT: RTP dest addr wrong
Greetings:
I have a working configuration for SCCP on our LANS which doesn't
route RTP correctly to a skinny phone behind NAT registering from
a remote public IP.
Configuration:
asterisk 1.4.35 servicing only skinny phones trunked to
asterisk 1.2.40 which services chan_phone FXS, zap FXO
and SIP phones; both instances of asterisk are behind NAT
and run on the same host (using different base
2003 Jun 11
1
SIP phone behind NAT
Hi all,
--------
I have a Asterisk at a public Network (official IP address). In the local
network I have isntalled a Snom 200 IP phone and in my home network (behind
NAT) a Snom 100 device. I can dial the Snom200 device from my home location
without any problems but the Snom200 can not dial me. It always gets a "we do
not rely". I tried to forward the SIP Port (5060) UDP via UPnP
2005 Jun 02
1
asterisk on internet sip phone behind nat - does someone even have this working
I have been working with this for a wile and I have been watching
the list for about a month on this subject, to no avail.
I am wondering if anyone has successfully configured asterisk for
clients to connect to it when the clients are behind nat. I mean
successfully because I can do everything except for audio, my audio is
only one way. I am asking so I can determin if I will be continuing
2005 Jun 02
3
asterisk on internet sip phone behind nat - doessomeone even have this working
Lance,
Have you configured your sip.conf to use these aprameters under General?
;externip=66.213.227.66
;localnet=192.168.1.0
;localmask=255.255.255.0
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Lance
Grover
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 9:39 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
2002 Sep 21
7
Another printing problem...
I'm running samba 2.2.3a-6 under Debian (testing) and I
am having a heck of a time getting Windows 2000 to print
to my printer. I keep getting that "Access denied, unable
to connect" message. At one point I had it so you could
print test pages, but as soon as you tried to print from
an application, it would break. However, that doesn't
even work anymore. I've been reading
2004 Jun 11
6
phone calls betweens phones behind the same nat
Hi,
I have the following problem.
I have 5 phones behind the same nat (canreinvite=yes). it works fine to
receive calls and to make calls. sound quality is good, so everything
works fine.
The poblem is that the phone behind nat cant call each other. It works
if canreinvite=no. But i want to do this.
Does anyone have an idea?
Regards,
cjk.
2005 Sep 05
4
sending fax
[outgoing-fax]
exten => _0XXXXXXXXX,1,SetVar(NumberCalled=${EXTEN})
exten => _0XXXXXXXXX,2,Wait(10)
exten => fax,1,SetCallerid(${FAX_CALLERID})
exten => fax,2,Dial(Zap/g1/${NumberCalled},60)
exten => fax,3,Hangup
exten => t,1,Busy
exten => i,1,Busy
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]
2008 Aug 07
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc builds on 32 bit linux broken
Hi Matthijs,
>> I did put in a hack, but it was horrible. It might be a good idea to
>> test out Mike's suggestion to see if it's a better way of doing it.
> I just tried building llvm-gcc without your hack, and it still works (even
> without the fix Mike suggested).
>
> So, it seems that r54245 can be reverted again?
>
> I didn't test bootstrap, however,
2018 Apr 09
2
Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video
Hello,
I have an Asterisk 15 with PJSIP behind NAT (Amazon EC2).
Now I would like to get Early Media Video working between clients in
different NATed networks. The 183 signalling goes trough perfectly, but
asterisk doesn't forward the Early Media RTP stream from the caller to the
recipent.
I have the following configuration:
[6001]
type = endpoint
context = internal
rewrite_contact = yes
2018 Apr 09
2
Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video
My understanding based on Wireshark analysis is that the signaling works
(also the recipent phone is displaying the video frame before accepting the
call), also the calling phone send video (i see that also via Wireshark)
but the recipent phone doesn't get any video from the Asterisk before the
call.
2018-04-09 17:02 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>:
> On Mon, Apr 9,
2018 Apr 09
2
Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video
Yes, media is flowing through Asterisk because both client's are behind
different NAT's.
Do I need to do something special in the Call Flow? Or anything additional
to the pjsip.conf?
2018-04-09 16:50 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Benjamin Marty wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have an Asterisk 15 with PJSIP behind
2018 Apr 09
3
Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video
wohoo, so if I unterstand it correctly with that patch early media video
works over the Asterisk server? In other words the Asterisk server get's
able to (process/)forward the early media video stream with that patch?
2018-04-09 17:57 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Benjamin Marty wrote:
> > My understanding based on Wireshark