similar to: Channel Bank

I have a data.frame object like: > data.frame(x=c('A','A','B','B'), y=c('Ab','Ac','Ba','Bd')) x y 1 A Ab 2 A Ac 3 B Ba 4 B Bd how could I create a tree structure object like this: |---Ab A---| _| |---Ac | | |---Ba B---| |---Bb Thanks, Zech [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have two datasets: A with columns Open and Name (and many others, irrelevant to the merge) B with columns Time and Name (and many others, irrelevant to the merge) I want the dataset AB with all these columns Open from A - a difftime (time of day) Time from B - a difftime (time of day) Name (same in A & B) - a factor, does NOT index rows, i.e., there are _many_ rows in both A & B with

Hi, I created the model below, which returns me the following warning message: In sem.default(ram = ram, S = S, N = N, param.names = pars, var.names = vars, : Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge. ######### Model ######## mDPDF = data.frame(mj1,mj2,mj3,mj4,mj5,eL1,eL2,eL3,eL4,eL5,aC1,aC2,aC3,aC4,disR1,disR2,disR3,disR4,disR5,

Has anyone ever heard of this so called Dynamic Impedance matching on the ADIT 600? I called their support and they've never heard of it. We are of course having echo problems are on the far end due to digital/analog conversion on the local end using a channel bank. We have purchased an ADIT 600 and yes the complaints are "far less" however we're still getting them. While I have

Hello, This is Elaine. I am trying a path analysis using lavaan Package. There are three explanatory variables: X, Z, and M. The response variable is Y. A, b, and c have direct effects on Y. On the other hand, X and Z also have direct effects on M. In other words, X and Z have indirect effects on Y. I found the code example of lavaan package describes only one indirect effect as below. Please

I just picked up a couple CAC Access Bank 1s loaded with FXS that should be arriving shortly. Does anyone have one that they use with Asterisk? If so, would you be willing to shoot me a note with your current configs? I'm not very familiar with CAC/etc, and it would save me countless hours of muddling through .. :) Any others tips you can give me on these banks would be very

Hi, I'm working on the codes below however every time I run them when they get to OpenBUGS I keep getting the error message: array index is greater than array upper bound for hab. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Suzie Codes: ungulate <- read.csv(file.choose ()) #ungulate ungulate <- as.matrix(ungulate);colnames(ungulate)<-NULL;rownames(ungulate)<-NULL

We are a voip terminating company, we're using Channelbank with FXS modules, Rhino, CAC, etc.. What we're wondering is, is how to would you echo cancel a channelbank. Of course we're realizing that cancel'ing on the T1 (on Ast) does no good (we think?) because the analog conversion is at the channelbank. Suggestions? Lowering the gain helps but we're looking for a real solution

Hello All, Just a question, I have an adit600 and I am looking for a way to pull the incoming cid into asterisk. Does anyone know if this is just not possible via t1? Or is it only available on PRI? Thanks, Greg

I am having trouble getting my T100P and ADIT 600 talking. I have 2 FXO 8 port cards in the ADIT and a T1 controller card. I have a T1 x-over cable connecting two together. Here are copies of the relevant bits of my zaptel.conf and Zapata.conf Zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs loadzone=us defaultzone=us Zapata.cfg context=default signalling=fxs_ks group=1 channel => 1-24 My

I know a few ppl have those CAC Adit 600's with t400 I can't seem to get my second span up on the T400 connected to the second spand on the adit (A:2) A:1 seems ok Can someone post they zaptel.conf span defintions And maybe a "print config" from the adit 600 cli I think my issue is timing srcs the coding, framing. bld out are all matched thx -------------- next part

Hi everyone, Does anyone know which channel banks work well with asterisk. Are there any that have T1/E1 connection? Eran Gal Xorcom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040818/0d2dd98b/attachment.htm

I'm trying to get a Carrier Access Corp. Channel Bank I working with a Digium T100P without success. What is stranger is that the status lights on the channel bank and T100P seem to change almost each time I power cycle the channel bank or reset the T100P. The channel bank has three status lights: T1, Framing, Status. T1 is green, Status is yellow, and Framing is usually red but sometime

Hello, I've recently purchased Adit 600 with 3FXS and 1FXO to be connected to my * server via T100P card. This is the output of "status equipment" command in the Adit600: For some reason the FXO card is seen as FXS, why? Is it ok? On the card it is written "FXO". Regards, Shlomi Bachar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hello, I have an Adit 600 (3 FXS cards) hooked up to a digium T1 card in my asterisk box. I 'connected' the slots to the a:1 T1 interfaces via the command line. The slots (3 fxs) are configured with 'ls' signaling. I configured the T1 card with the same line settings as the T1 interfaces on the adit and I get green lights on both the T1 card and the T1 interface on the adit (so

I am hoping to replace my Nortel 8x24 switch with Asterisk. Right now my cabling comes from my outside phone box into my office and into a punchdown block and leaves the punchdown block as an amphenol connector which currently plugs into the Nortel swicth. A second amphenol connector them plugs into the switch and extends to another punchdown block that I believe carries the lines throughout the

Hello, I am working for a charity in the UK and I am projecting a new phone system. We would like to connect our two-wire telephones (40 or so) to an ADIT 600 channel bank, and connect that into an Asterisk box via the CMG card or T1 card. I have been in talks with Carrier Access about the purchase of a new channel bank and we tried to get a minor version of it first for testing with the

I've been replacing an old Toshiba DK switch with an Asterisk solution. I'm needing a solution for fax machines that works as well as a POTS line from my carrier. If the POTS line is the solution, I'll keep it, but I'd rather move away from that. Here's what I'm thinking...will it work? I would use a dual-port Digium T1 card. In one port, I'd terminate a telco PRI

As soon I do a reload I see contant ringing like this on the CLI: -- Zap/14-1 is ringing -- Zap/23-1 is ringing -- Zap/22-1 is ringing -- Zap/20-1 is ringing -- Zap/19-1 is ringing -- Zap/14-1 is ringing -- Zap/23-1 is ringing -- Zap/22-1 is ringing -- Zap/20-1 is ringing -- Zap/19-1 is ringing This goes on continuously and no phones are ringing. I am using a digium T1 card and ADIT 600. Does

Jon, I actually had some more discussions with Tim on this issue, and it seems that the channel bank would still be a good option to choose for internal purposes. I would not see any other solution than a channel bank to connect many 2wire phones into one asterisk box. I had a talk today with Carrier Access, and it seems that the adit would do us fine. The fxs cards of the adit 600 are