similar to: Stepped deployment - T1 PRI passthru

I have a TDM400 card with 3x FXO and 1x FXS ports on it. At the moment I'd prefer (till I can get it working more reliable with iaxmodem), for a faxmodem to answer one of the lines instead of the linecard. I've tried changing the context of that line so that the exten => s does nothing, but that stops the line from being able to receive calls (get a recorded This number is not

Hi, I've been debuging the call disconnection problem in our architecture: PSTN---E1---OldPBX---E1---Asterisk This is our problem: -SIP user agent "A" calls a pstn phone "B". -"B" hangs up the call. -SIP user agent "A" starts listenning busytones... But the call still on. (and being payed). - Call only ends when it is correctly hanged up in the

Hi, I'm currently trying to originate a call with 2 variables set. I tried doing it via manager API and call File and both failed, because the vars were not separated. I'm using Asterisk 1.2_beta1 on this machine Can anyone here verify wether this is a bug or just a stupid error on my part? This is the callfile I tried to use, after the manager way failed: Channel:

Hi, We are using Vicidial and sometime even when agent disconnects, outgoing call originated by dialer is still active. Since call was initiated by dialer and then bought into meetme conference of agent and we can't corelate this call to any agent channel. When agents are dialing, channels doesn't show calls vicidial2*CLI> show channels Channel Location

Hi all, My scenario is this one: LandLine------------------E1---------------|-------------| |-------------------| |OLDPBX|-------E1-----------|Asterisk1.2.5|-----VoIPusers GSMGateway---------Analogue------ |-------------| |-------------------| What is happening: 1- SipUserAgent "A" Dials a call to a Local Extension "B" in the OldPbx 2- "B" , the called party

Hi all, i have: out side PSTN-------->OldPBX---------Analog----->Asterisk (X100P) ^ | Local Ext What is happening is: Calls from Local ext goes to Asterisk and everything is fine. Calls from Out side PSTN reach the OldPBx and are bridged do Asterisk, but i don't listen firs audio

At work, I have 4 branch offices at which I've deployed asterisk. Call termination/origination at each branch office is handled either through a frac PRI or 3rd party SIP provider. Soon, I'll be replacing the legacy PBX at our HQ with asterisk. Each branch office has between 3 and 20 employees, each with their own extension and DID, and at headquarters, we have about 70 people, again

I've been working with a telco for the past two days trying to get a PRI span up and running. This is a small-ish telco and I get the feeling they don't do this very often. Anyway, they specified a pretty standard setup: ni2 switchtype, esf framing, b8zs coding, etc. All of my b-channels are up, but we're having a heck of a time getting the d-channel to come up. He finds out that

Shortly, I'll be purchasing a Sangoma A102. I'm wondering if I should spring for the hardware echo cancellation circuit or not. Upon initial implementation, the 2 T1 Ports will be used as a passthrough as we slowly transition off of a legacy PBX. Eventually, we'll only be using one of the ports, and will be providing VoIP service to a bunch of SIP deskphones. So - with that usage

Anyone have experience with T.38 passthru in Asterisk 1.4 to a MAX TNT Media Gateway? We're experiencing sporadic results... Topology is described below... Thanks in advance.. -Joe Traditional Fax <-Analog Line-> ATA <-SIP-> Ast1.4T.38Passthru <-SIP-> MAX TNT <-PRI-> PSTN -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Does anyone have experience setting up a [homes] share that can be automounted for users logging in to clients using winbind authentication?

Are there limitations on the number of devices that can be assigned to each DomU? If I assign more than 2 devices to a Windows domain, one of them doesn''t work. Thanks (sorry if it''s a duplicate, I didn''t see the previous copy coming out) -e _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hi, My environment is as below: Hardware: Dell R210 NICs: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCN5709/5716 (w/o FLR) Xen: xen 4.1.2 Kernel: 3.6.32.57 (final version of xen community) Distribution: Centos 6.2 (upgraded to above kernel) When I added iommu=soft to domU kernel boot line, the PCI passthru-ed NICs can be UP and RUNNING. Otherwise, omit iommu=soft option would make the passthru-ed NICs only UP but

I'm trying to get Asterisk to pass thru calls using the G729 codec. I've got a 7960 phone and my gateway is an AS5400. I got the following messages when debugging SIP (7778881000 is the 7960): WARNING[1872]: channel.c:2115 ast_channel_make_compatible: No path to translate from SIP/7778881000-2874(4) to SIP/as5400-35c1(256) WARNING[1872]: app_dial.c:1002 dial_exec: Had to drop call

I have a SIP carrier which accepts only G729 connections from my Asterisk server. If all the server does is Dial() (out) two legs of a call which are natively bridged, with no processing the media (and no DTMF detection, etc), do I need to install a G729 codec of my own? All the media from each leg connected to the other is already encoded into G729 by the SIP carrier from which it's coming

Our setup is: 9.6k Modem <-analog-> Mitel SX-200 <-(pri)-> Asterisk <-(pri) -> Telco The modem works fine with the Mitel directly connected to the Telco, but once we add Asterisk in between connections start failing. I suspect the issue is caused by the echo canceller, since I believe the issue appear about the time we turned echo cancellation on (for the IAX users). We

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:35:36 -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > This patch series enables virtio to switch over to a VF datapath when a VF > netdev is present with the same MAC address. It allows live migration of a VM > with a direct attached VF without the need to setup a bond/team between a > VF and virtio net device in the guest. > > The hypervisor needs to unplug the VF

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:11:19 -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > Ppatch 2 is in response to the community request for a 3 netdev > solution. However, it creates some issues we'll get into in a moment. > It extends virtio_net to use alternate datapath when available and > registered. When BACKUP feature is enabled, virtio_net driver creates > an additional 'bypass' netdev

Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP that can be >used by hypervisor to indicate that virtio_net interface should act as >a backup for another device with the same MAC address. > >Ppatch 2 is in response to the community request for a 3 netdev >solution. However, it creates some

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:57:09 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > I don't see why the team cannot be there always. > > It is more the logistical nightmare. Part of the goal here was to work > with the cloud base images that are out there such as > https://alt.fedoraproject.org/cloud/. With just the kernel changes the > overhead for this stays fairly small and would be