Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "OT: Sipura DST Rules"
2006 Apr 19
2
Asterisk 1.2.7.1 DTMF anomaly
Greetings,
I'm using asterisk to connect our three locations together with a sort
of inter-company auto attendant connected like this:
PBX (fxs) <-> Sipura 3k (fxo) <-> Asterisk <-IAX-> remote asterisk
It works like this: Person picks up their phone and dials a number to
get to the auto attendant (I don't have any FXO ports available on our
PBX to do it the
2008 Nov 11
3
OT: Polycom Firmware available (by accident?)
Not sure if Polycom is changing their policy or if this is an accident,
but you can actually download SIP 3.1.1 right from their web site.
Anyone looking for firmware should get it now before it disappears.
SIP app and release notes can be found here:
http://www.polycom.com/usa/en/support/voice/soundpoint_ip/soundpoint_ip450.html
-Dave
2009 Mar 27
3
AT&T PRI Install - What is outpulsed?
Hey All,
AT&T is installing a PRI in a couple weeks and while I've been doing
homework on PRI's for the last few weeks there's something I'm still
confused about. After being asked how many digits I wanted them to send
us (10) was how many digits will you outpulse to us, 4, 7 or 10? I asked
her what that meant and all I got was the question repeated. Do any of
you have
2005 May 31
2
Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working
Hi,
I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to
Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura
is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings
on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind
Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just
fine, but I can't hear
2004 Jan 08
3
Asterisk & Sipura 2000
I have been trying to read everything I can find on Sipura 2000 and
Asterisk. I am trying to make the Sipura-2000 act as two analog lines off
my asterisk. I have followed (what I believe) the example on
http://www.voxilla.com/Article39.phtml and I still can't get my Sipura to
register with my Asterisk server. I can re-config my Sipura to talk to fwd,
or voice-pulse connect and it works
2004 Jul 02
4
Delay when dialing with Sipura 2000
I have a Sipura 2000 working fine, but whenever
I dial any extension there is a delay of 5-10 seconds before
it starts ringing. However, if I dial the extension and hit
the pound key after the number, it goes through right away.
Is there any way around this?
2005 Jun 16
2
Multiple Sipura 3000
If I have multiple Sipura 3000 device how can I dial out properly? I
can receive call without any problem and that's working really well.
Caller ID is shown and when someone call he get's the welcome message
the same way I have it configure with the X100P card. I don't seem to
have any echo problem with the Sipura 3000 (but I do with X100P cards)
My main concern is for
2004 Sep 30
3
Sipura-3000 - silent dial out on FXO port
I am trying to configure the FXO port on a Sipura-3000 for use with Asterisk.
When I connect to the Sipura to dial out on the PSTN line connected to
the Sipura's FXO port, it gives me the dialtone of the PSTN line and
then I can hear the DTMF for the number I dialled beforehand.
It does work but the customer perceives this delayed second DTMF
feedback as "unprofessional" and the
2008 Apr 29
1
Annoying Sipura problem?
This may not be the right place to ask, but I have an annoying issue with
a Sipura/SPA1000-2.0.10(e) ATA device connected to an Asterisk box. (The
system is remote to me, so I've only been able to observe this by dialling
into a VoIP phone on-site, then run commands on the box remotely!)
First of all it's all working fine connected to an Asterisk box and the
user can make/take calls
2004 May 22
1
Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY re quests)
Sipura does include STUN as an option. It has for quite some time. We are
using it with all of our Sipuras behind NAT'd gateways and it works great!
Try upgrading to the latest Sipura firmware rev.
Darren Nay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Todd [mailto:jtodd@loligo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 1:57 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject:
2005 Sep 29
3
Problems using SIPURA and MFC/R2
We are using MFC/R2 driver successfully in at least three places in Brazil. I have problem with an Asterisk integrated with MFC/R2 with a Siemens Hicom 300. I can get a good audio quality with Grandstream, Polycom, and X-Lite softfones, but SIPURAS and Linksys get a garbled audio, something like a "Darth Vader" voice. We have tried everything in Sipura. The SIPURA 2000 and the Linksys
2004 Jan 24
2
Sipura 2000 Transmit Issues? No Sound being passed to caller
I've been beating my head for 5 hours to figure out why my asterisk
server or sipura isn't passing my voice over to the caller. It seems i
can hear the caller but they can't hear me it seems either the
asterisk or the sipura isn't passing this information.
Here's my setup specs
asterisk server 0.7.1 - X100P Card - Sipura 2000 - Nufone Service -
Voicepulse
2005 Sep 10
1
Configuring SIPURA 2002 to work wih Asterisk
I'm setting up Asterisk for the first time. I purchased a SIPURA 2002 ATA
to connect with the Asterisk server.
In the /var/log/asterisk/messages log I keep getting an error indicating
wrong password. Below is the error I am receiving. Note that the IP
address and username has been modified for security.
Sep 10 15:56:22 NOTICE[24099] chan_sip.c: Registration from 'John Doe
2004 May 22
1
Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY requests)
At 7:36 PM +0200 on 5/22/04, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>>[snip]
>Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk
>can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points
>out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything.
>
>The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable.
>
>Another problem with the SIPURA is
2005 Jun 02
2
asterisk sipura and g726 codec
With sipura (I tried this with both the 3000 and 841) set to prefer
the g726-32 codec, a call from the sipura to asterisk will use g726.
Asterisk sip.conf has:
disallow=all
allow=g726
allow=gsm
allow=alaw
When the call is from asterisk to the sipura, asterisk will not use
g726. It ends up using alaw. I usually use stable but I tried this
with head too, and same thing happens.
Anybody know how
2006 Jan 18
4
sipura ata 3000 UK (BT) CAllerid
Hi
I wonder whether anyone got the Sipura ata 3000 to decode British
Telecoms callerid and pass it to asterisk?
The userguide seems to suggest that this is not possible, is that right?
Conrad
2004 Jun 14
4
Sipura 2000 not answering em_w calls
I recently purchased a Sipura 2000 and connected a phone to it which is
connected to my asterisk box via sip.
Calls to the Sipura 2000 work fine from another sip device connected
through *, from either an fxo or fxs (via adtran channel bank connected
to a T400P card) port. However, when a call comes in from the phone
company over a T1 with em_w trunks, the phone on the Sipura will ring
but I
2003 Dec 12
3
SIPURA Breaches Contract
Hi list,
Well I really didn't want to see things get to this point,
but Sherman at Sipura along with their President Jan F.
leave me no other choice.
SIPURA has been provided a letter from our attorney for
Breach of Contract and damages. They have yet to respond.
A quick background.
1. Sherman (SIPURA's Director of Marketing), stated that
we would do a join press release for the Oct
2006 Mar 03
3
Sipura RMA
Anyone have any luck RMAing a Sipura phone since the Cisco take over?
Sipura only has support via email or fax to end users and I haven't
gotten a response to either for over 2 months.
Linksys Support will jump you through all their scripted hoops to
resolve your problem (they hope if they speak with a thick enough accent
and make repeat the same steps over and over again that you will just
2004 Oct 01
5
OT: Opensource "Sipura Profile Compiler" for SPA2K, 3K
Hello list,
I have several SPA-2000's and 3000's scattered about the Internet (all
behind NATs). Because I do not qualify as an ITSP, Sipura will not
license their "Sipura Profile Compiler" so that I can have the units
remote upgrade, remote re-configure, etc (via TFTP or HTTP). This is
extremely annoying.
Right now if I have to make a config change to any of these