similar to: problem with asterisk AGI

I have looked around with no luck. Does anyone know of a way to send an email from the dialplan. The system that I am working on has none thing to do with VoiceMail. This is something like the SMS command but using sending email I am working on a prepaid alarm dispatch program for Asterisk if anyone has any input please let me know. I will be more than happy to write the code as Open Source

Dear All : I need to mask the caller ID and pretend to make a transfer call from another extension : exten => 558,1,Answer exten => 558,2,Playback(soundclip) exten => 558,3,Dial(SIP/472@callman) The scenario is like this : Someone is calling 558 at my company - he will hear a soundclip voice message then I will direct it to extension 472 I need 472 to not see the extension of

Hello, I have the following simple application... 1. Call is answered, and Dial() function is used with a macro to dial out to a number. 2. 'Called' party answers the phone, and hears a message (this is a function of the macro) At this point I'd like for the 'Called' Party to be able to make a decision and press 1 or 2 to hear some additional information before

I'm attempting to setup Asterisk 1.4.0 CDRs to use MySQL. Modules show like cdr_mysql.so tells me it is loaded. Reload cdr with MySQL started or stopped makes no difference in the errors. Ideas? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070220/55700f37/attachment.htm

Help! I'm (still) having issues with Asterisk Queues. I want to implement a queue so that callers get the 'all our staff are busy at the moment, your call has been placed in a queue and will be answered by the first available operator. You may press 1 at any time to leave a voicemail' announcement, then they can press 1 and leave a voicemail. Documentation with * 1.2.x (I'm

I create a zooreg object that runs from Jan-1-2002 0:00 to Jun-1-2005 0:00... regts.start = ISOdatetime(2002, 1, 1, hour=0, min=0, sec=0, tz="") regts.end = ISOdatetime(2005, 6, 1, hour=0, min=0, sec=0, tz="") regts.zoo <- zooreg( NA, regts.start, regts.end, deltat=3600 ) Upon inspection: > regts.zoo[1:3] 2002-01-01 00:00:00 2002-01-01 01:00:00 2002-01-01 02:00:00

Thanks for everyone's help with zoo -- I think I've got my data set ready. (The data consists of surface weather temperatures, from 2002 to 2005, one observation per hour. Some values are missing... i.e. NA) I have three goals: GOAL #1:Get the data in proper time series form, preserving frequency information: > w4.ts <- as.ts( w3.zoo, frequency=(1/3600) ) I hope that 1/3600

Hello, I problem is in the format of the date, my time series is like this: 2006070100 1244 61 62 2006070101 1221 60 60 2006070102 1214 60 60 2006070103 1194 59 59 2006070104 1182 58 58 2006070105 1178 58 58 2006070106 1176 58 58 2006070107 1173 58 58

Hello, I'm trying to develop a box plot of time series data to look at the range in the data values over the entire period of record. My data initially starts out as a list of hourly data, and then I've been using this code to make this data into the final ts array. # Read in the station list stn.list <- read.csv("/home/kbennett/fews/stnlist3", as.is=T, header=F) # Read in

Hello, I using the fuction auto.arima() from package forecast to predict the values of p,d,q and P,D,Q. My problem is the execution time of this function, for example, a time series with 2323 values with seasonality to the week take over 8 hours to execute all the possibilities. I using a computer with Windows XP, a processor Intel Core2 Duo T7300 and 2Gb of RAM.

On 08/09/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > This code isn't actually replacing the virtual register with a physreg. Then why changing its optype? It makes the assertion fails: MachineOperand& MO = inst.getOperand(n); if (MRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg())) { assert(MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister == MO.getType()); ... } Is that alright? Some

I don't understand the following code snippet in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp. Why changing the type of the opreand from a virtual register to a machine register? The register number (reg) is still a virtual register index (>1024). bool LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn) { // perform a final pass over the instructions and compute spill // weights, coalesce

OK, here's a new patch that adds the infrastructure and the implementation for X86, ARM and PPC of GetInstSize and GetFunctionSize. Both functions are virtual functions defined in TargetInstrInfo.h. For X86, I moved some commodity functions from X86CodeEmitter to X86InstrInfo. What do you think? Nicolas Evan Cheng wrote: > > I think both of these belong to TargetInstrInfo. And

Thx again Evan for the review. Here's a new patch for the JIT in itself. The major changes are: 1) A JITMemoryManager now has a flag saying "I require to know the size of what you want to emit" 2) DwarfJITEmitter is augmented with GetSize* functions 3) JITEmitter::startFunction checks if the JITMemoryManager requires to know the size. If so, it computes it and gives it through the

So what addIntervalsToSpills returns are new intervals to allocate with infinite weights, right? And I need not to allocate the old interval. Should hasStackSlot return true on its register then? On 8/21/06, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira <fernando at cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > > > Well, someone correct me if am wrong, but, you still have to allocate > physical registers to them,

Hi everyone, Here's a patch that enables exception handling when jitting. I've copy/pasted _many_code from lib/Codegen/DwarfWriter.cpp, so we may need to factorize it, but the functionality is there and I'm very happy with it :) lli should now be able to execute the output from llvm-gcc when using exceptions (the UnwindInst instruction is not involved in this patch). Just add the

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: >> As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've >> come across the need to do some refactoring. > > cool. :) One request: Evan is currently out on vacation until Monday. > This is an area that he is very interested in and will want to chime in > on. Please don't start anything

> So what addIntervalsToSpills returns are new intervals to allocate with > infinite weights, right? > And I need not to allocate the old interval. Should hasStackSlot return true > on its register then? > I am not very sure about addIntervalsToSpill, but, for all the registers created to replace a spilled registers, they must have a stack slot assigned to them. I am sending you my

Dear all, Here's a new patch with Evan's comments (thx Evan!) and some cleanups. Now the (duplicated) exception handling code is in a new file: lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITDwarfEmitter. This patch should work on linux/x86 and linux/ppc (tested). Nicolas -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: jit-exceptions.patch URL:

> Hi Fernando, > > It's hard to say exactly what's happening because I don't know your > code (though, from the stack trace, it seems like there's some sort > of memory debacle), but looking at the comment in the > LiveVariableAnalysis.cpp file where it's folding memory operands, it > might explain somethings better: > > // Folding the