Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "mocking errors"
2007 Apr 30
4
Mocking with Calculated Results
I am setting up an AR mock object and wanted to sanity check it. My
intent is to mix this into all my examples and then override/add
methods where necessary. Note that I''ve anticipated three cases for
find:
find with one numeric argument => object
find with :all => Array
find with anything else => nil
This roughly approximates how ActiveRecord::find works in this case
2007 Jun 25
5
strange mock error
I''m testing using the rspec mocking framework and rspec 1.0.5 and I''m
getting the following strange error:
#<Spec::Mocks::Mock:0x337f7c8> expected :set_defaults with (#<Service:
0x19c4040 @name="Service_1023">, {"1"=>"1", "2"=>"2"}) but received
it with (#<Service:0x19c4040
2007 Jun 09
11
authentication, controller specs. I think I''m missing something simple ....
Hi all,
I feel like I''m missing something really easy and I''m just not seeing
it.
I''m using the restful_authentication plugin and have a User model. Uesr
has_many :things and Thing belongs_to :user.
That''s it.
I did a "script/generate rspec_scaffold thing" to generate all the
necessary bits. The "rake db:migrate" to create the db.
At
2008 Jan 28
2
Could this controller test be made simpler?
In a create controller method I am testing the else clause that occurs
when the model is unable to be saved. Sounds simple enough, but because
model is created before the save and the form has to be re-filled I now
have to stub a model and all the attributes. Since the error messages
are displayed I also have to stub some methods within the model that
allow the error messages to be displayed
2007 Apr 28
7
[ rspec-Patches-9605 ] Patch for ER 9472, shared behaviour
Hi all - I''ve applied (to trunk) Bob Cotton''s patch which supports
shared behaviours (link to tracker below).
I''m still toying w/ names, so please be aware that until this is
released w/ 0.9 it should be considered experimental and there will
NOT be translation support for it. It will definitely be included in
some form - just the names (specifically
2007 Jul 18
5
Mocking Rails association collections
Rails model association collections allow you to do nifty things like:
article.comments.find(:all, :conditions => {:created_at > 1.day.ago})
Has anyone found a good way to mock this up? I''m currently doing this:
@comment1 = mock_model(Comment)
comments = mock(Array)
comments.stub!(:find).and_return([@comment1])
@article = mock_model(Article)
2007 Jul 05
6
mocking methods in the controller.
Hi,
I''m very new to rspec so please be patient with me.
I''ve tried to take some of my tests out of the controller specs to check for
things that are rendered.
This has not worked so well, since my views have the controller method
current_user
in quite a few places.
Is there any way that I can define this so that my views will be executed?
Will this same thing occur for all
2007 May 20
9
How to test for exceptions
Hi folks,
I''m in the process of converting a Test::Unit functional test to RSpec, but I''ve run into a slight problem. I tried looking through the documentation but I still don''t know what I missed.
Thanks in advance,
Blake
describe VenuesController, "on update" do
before(:each) do
@venue = mock("venue")
2007 Jul 24
6
Mocking Access Control
I''m trying to jump on the TDD/BDD bandwagon, but am having trouble
understanding how i should mock my user. The user has a habtm
relationship to a roles model (acl_system2 plugin), but I''m not sure
how to tell rspec about a model.
My code:
describe UsersController do
integrate_views
before(:each) do
@user = mock_model(User)
2007 Aug 08
5
Can''t seem to spec a ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid exception properly...
1 def create
2 @user = User.new(params[:user])
3 @user.save!
4 self.current_user = @user
5 redirect_to user_path(@user)
6 flash[:notice] = "Thanks for signing up!"
7 rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid
8 render :action => ''new''
9 end
I can''t seem to properly spec this out. I am trying numerous things, the
latest one is
2007 Dec 03
18
Need help mocking this out
Let''s say you''re using the restful_authentication plugin.
You have a model called articles. On the index action of the
articlescontroller you simply want to spec out that it''ll scope the results
to the ownership of the current_user.
It should NOT include any articles other than the articles that user owns.
How would you properly spec this out?
Thanks for the help!
2007 Oct 25
1
Mocking/Stubbing help with subdomain as account key
My app uses account_location to set up subdomains as account keys. In
my controllers, all my model operations are scoped through the
@current_person object.
The question is: How do I test this with RSpec''s mocking and
stubbing? Basically, I need to test that @current_person.things is
getting the find message and returning @thing. I''ve tried stubbing
and mocking
2007 Oct 06
4
spec''ing views, mock_model associations
I writing a spec that returns the count of how many players in a game:
it "should how many players in a link to all players" do
render :partial =>"games/game", :object => @game
response.should have_tag(''a'',"(2) Players")
end
I''m not sure how to do the mock model, I think it would be done two ways but
unsure of the syntax:
1: add
2007 Oct 05
7
Easy AR association stubbing
I''ve added a method to the mock class that makes it pretty easy to
stub associations in rails. I''ve been using it for awhile and it seems
to cut down on a lot of setup code for the controller and model specs
that use associations.
#before
@person = mock_model(Person)
posts = mock(''post_proxy'')
posts.stub!(:build).and_return(mock_model(Post, :save => true))
2007 Sep 30
9
Problems with testing nested routes using mocking
Hello forum
I have there to files
#----- virtual_host_controller.rb
class VirtualHostsController < ApplicationController
before_filter :capture_domain
# GET /domain/1/virtual_hosts/1
def show
@virtual_host = @domain.virtual_hosts.find(params[:id])
respond_to do |format|
format.html # show.rhtml
end
end
private
def capture_domain
if
2007 Nov 21
7
describe AddressesController, "handling GET /addresses" do
Hello,
I''m working with scaffold generated controller test code for handling GET
requests. Address is the model being tested. Address belongs_to Company,
Company has_many addresses.
In my addresses_controller I have:
before_filter :get_company
def index
@addresses = @company.addresses.find(:all)
respond_to do |format|
format.html # index.html.erb
format.xml {
2009 Feb 25
2
How to properly mock a complex object "comment.initiator.group.name"?
I am wondering what is the best way to mock such expression:
"comment.initiator.group.name"
What I do now is:
===========================
comment = mock_model(Comment)
initiator = mock_model(User)
group = mock_model(Group, :name => "Admin")
initiator.stub!(:group).and_return(group)
comment.stub!(:initiator).and_return(initiator)
===========================
So it becomes
2007 Jun 02
7
I''m really bad at controllers, help please.
Hey,
Sorry for so many questions - I''m really bad at this right now.
I''m trying to cover the following code w/ rspec
def index
if params[:user_id]
@user = User.find(params[:user_id])
@messages = @user.messages
end
end
So basically what I''m doing is listing all the messages for a user,
provided there is an id parameter.
describe
2012 Aug 03
1
Mock_model not recognizing act_as_mappable
I am using mock_model in my tests, and I encountered a situation where my
stub is failing. Here''s the scenario:
Controller:
@locations = Location.al(:bounds=>bounds)l
@locations.sort_by_distance_from([bounds.center.lat,bounds.center.lng])
Rspec:
@location = mock_model(Location)
Location.stub(:all).and_return([@location])
2007 Jun 07
4
checking associated objects have been deleted
I have the following model:
class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :taggings, :dependent => :delete_all
has_many :tags, :through => :taggings
end
is it possible to check that associated taggings are being destroyed
using mocks? I don''t want to test that rails is deleting the
associations, I want to test that I have specified the association as
a dependent one.
the only