similar to: asterisk server RFC conformance

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Olivier Cailloux wrote: > The real, ?final? question I am interested in is, but which might be > slightly off-topic on this list (the reason I asked the other > question), is to find providers that satisfy these two conditions: > a) offer free e-mail accounts > b) implement correctly the IMAP SEARCH feature of RFC 3501. IMO this is the

Folks, I'm now looking at https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16274, which seems to have some support in the vectorizer, but not as we need for this particular case. I may have missed something obvious, please let me know if there is a better way. As you already know, ARM has two FP instruction sets: VFP and NEON. VFP applies to single FP registers while NEON is a full SIMD. The problem is

hi, i am getting unsolicited NOTIFY messages from Asterisk after the subscription. Is this type of NOTIFY messages is supported in any of the RFCs..? Because, the SIP stack with 3265 compliance, does not support any such NOTIFY messages and discarding those. I need the justification for this kind of NOTIFY messages sent by Asterisk. I need your valuable inputs... Thanks in Advance, Subashini

I beg to differ. Digium is hiding from the real world and somebody is going take the software and run with it. My customers lost in excess of $50.000 and cut my pay in half, because of hackers. The hackers figured out how to scan every asterisk for weak passwords or open ports, and bang them real good. We need two things: a) disable in sip.conf the reply for INVITES that have wrong user

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:08:56 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > FWIW, I agree that the current situation with llvm-gcc is not ideal, but > most of us just build llvm-gcc once and forget about it. The real > solution here is to endow LLVM with its own C/C++ compiler and bootstap, > but that's a longer strategy. > > Reid. While I agree this would be the

On 25 March 2016 at 04:11, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > As I understand it, the fundamental property being addresses here is: Are the semantics of scalar FP math the same as vector FP math? TTI seems like a good place to expose that information. If the semantics are indeed different, then the vectorizer would require fast-math flags in order to vectorize FP operations

Hi, My dilemma is how should I write my module to be "next-gen" ? Not from a code point of view but from a design/layout point of view. We wrote our modules for 2.6.x like every beginner would have done: write everything in init.pp. But now, the fashion is to use parameterized classes and Hiera which we will use with puppet 2.7.x. I mainly followed/watched what Example42 was doing.

On Fri, February 10, 2017 06:26, Patrick Begou wrote: > Hello > > I have more and more troubles using firefox in professional > environment with > CentOS6. The latest version is 45.7.0 But I can't use it anymore to > access some > old server hardware (IDRAC7 of DELL C6100) because of > "/SSL_ERROR_WEAK_SERVER_CERT_KEY/". I had to install an old Firefox32 >

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Norbert Pocs wrote: > Hi OpenSSH mailing list, > > I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] > for > > FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 > > version. > > The patch targets OpenSSL support of OpenSSH, specifically the usage of > > old low level API. The new

I have used S-PLUS, R, MATLAB and SAS for many years, and I am actually quite happy to use any of these four languages. The reason may in part involve my using the various languages for the purposes to which they seem most suited. Hence there are many things for which I would not use SAS or MATLAB, but for which I would greatly prefer to use R instead. On the other hand ( to take one of a

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:08:56 -0700 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > FWIW, I agree that the current situation with llvm-gcc is not ideal, but > > most of us just build llvm-gcc once and forget about it. The real > > solution here is to endow LLVM with its own C/C++ compiler and bootstap, > > but

Hi Reid, Thanks for your response. The issue is that every LLVM frontend needing ABI compliance has to re-implement the same target-dependent logic, which is a significant burden; the ABI compliance code inside Clang isn't really usable for other frontends as-is. We haven't got many good options here :-). I think a lot of people would've hoped that LLVM would provide the means for

Hi OpenSSH mailing list, I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] for FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 version. The patch targets OpenSSL support of OpenSSH, specifically the usage of old low level API. The new OpenSSL version 3.0 introduces a FIPS module (going through FIPS 140-2 validation and to be FIPS 140-3

Hi, I have browsed through your syslinux archives and see that the issue of an UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module has come up several times: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-August/022611.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-March/023320.html http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-September/024231.html Now the issue as I understand it is that the original pxechn-module

i've deployed a Solr server, and setup Dovecot for *both* squat & solr FTS. iiuc, reading at, http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr as of dovecot v1.1.2, squat's required for IMAP compliance; solr search breaks it. is that still the case in v1.2? Is IMAP-compliant Solr search possible? planned? if the goal is fast, indexed FTS of dovecot

I need a cheap platform for installing a tdm400. Could someone tell me if the cheap cpubuilders computer at sams $179 (cbs110l) is pci 2.2 compliance? I ve got a compaq deskpro en 700 that does not seems to be compliant and I need to change it to start developing. Thanks for the help. Computer Model: CBS110L --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail

Hello All, Im using OpenSSH 4.2p1 statically linked with OpenSSL 0.9.7i. It looks now that a fips certified OpenSSL is now available at http://www.openssl.org/source/OpenSSL-fips-1.0.tar.gz . I like to know of any patches applicable for OpenSSH versions to make it fips compliant. Is there any idea for OpenSSH core team to make OpenSSH as fips compliant? What amount of work it needs at this

Hi Gurus, I have a simple failover cluster on two SLES 12 SP3 nodes with Samba/winbind for authenticating AD-user access to the shares. The shares are reached through a virtual hostname/IP which differs from the SLES-server itself. The servers uses SSSD for normal SSH-authentication, also against the same Active Domain. Here is the problem - if I get Samba/winbind to work with the virtual

Is samba FIPS compliant ? If so, does it need to use SMB2/SMB3 to be FIPS compliant ? We do not use the Heimdal Kerberos libraries that can be compiled with the samba release. We are use samba 4.0.7. Regards, - Mike ?

Greetings List,Trying to interconnect with a new provider.. the require a?compliance?with?RFC 3261 ?so knowing less than needed about RFC documentations.. i would like to know if Asterisk is actually in compliance with?RFC 3261 or not..?Can any one help with this? Regards -- Tarek Sawah Integrated Digital Systems CCNA, MCSE, RHCE, VoIP USA: +1 347 562 2308