similar to: Colomachine & TE405P

Hey all, It such a shame that BRI technology is such a flop in the USA. For a small office such as mine it would be a great product. So her goes my question.... What is a known asterisk working BRI card that will operate in the USA. I need to weigh price/quality. I need to do DID/DDI (or what ever you want to call it). Asterisk will do everything else I need. The ILEC has at the other

Ok here is one for you. I know we all do the this for 911: exten => _911,1,Dial(Zap/1/911) exten => _9911,1,Dial(Zap/1/911) And this probably is more then acceptable for most of us. However I have a system setup that uses SIP for most calls and 1 POTS line. We use a "least cost" routing that uses the POTS line for local calls AND SIP when appropiate. What I want to do is

Hello all, I'm looking for software for my asterisk logs that will compile the information into nice web-based charts and graphs. Something that works similar to webalizer for apache. I want to be able to spot trends of usage, call volume levels, disconnect/failure levels, and basically see exactly where my system has been at over the past day/week/month, etc. . I would prefer for

Ok this is a simple question... What has been your experience with the WellTech 38xx series (I'm looking specifically at the 3802) VoIP gateway? I'm looking for a good (and hopefully not too expensive) VoIP/T.38 gateway for my office. Asterisk intergration is not a major factor at this time but may be later on. How well does it work? Is Echo a problem? Do the T.38 capablities

Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather (especially IAX), I need something more reliable. I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link explaining how to setup Linux server -- #Joseph

Is it possible to include a factor in an nls formula? I've searched the help pages without any luck so I guess it is not feasible. I've given it a few attempts without luck getting the message: + not meaningful for factors in: Ops.factor(independ^EE, a) This is a toy example, my realworld case is much more complicated (and can not be solved linearizing an using lm)

I'm using samba 3.0.1pre3 as fileserver for my windows clients (xp and 98) My users are separated in many groups and some dirs should be writeable for 2 groups at once. Unix permissions does not allow to have 2 groups for a directory or file. I could put 777 in the directory and force umasks, but that really anoys me. So I did a little workaround to make it work and now I wonder if it is

Hey guys, I'm looking for some realworld specs on somebodys machine that will work with the Digium 4-port T1/PRI card and that will support 96 simultaneous calls. Dell is soon to release the PowerEdge 1850: 2U, Dual 3.6Ghz Xenon, 1Gb DDR2 RAM, Dual 36GB Ultra320 SCSI RAID, Hot swap Powersupply, one 64bit 133Mhz PCI and one 64bit 100Mhz PCI for about $3,000. Tack on a 4 port Digium card and

Hello r-proffessionals, this is not a special R-Question, but have anybody a good reason for nonstatistican's why the interpretation of correlations with cases under 20-30 are dangerous !? ...i have got problems explain this without formula's and perhaps anybody know a realworld example what point this problem !? thanks for any suggestion or url/doc etc. Christian Schulz

Hi, I will probably have to design an e-mail (and other components) infrastructure for a small ISP soon (WISP). I'm doing some research to determine which components would be best to offer e-mail services to their client and allow the staff to manage accounts easily. I usually use virtual machines a lot for isolation and easy backups and migration (when a hardware node is

Hey guys, We have a brand new Dell Poweredge 1850, Single Proc 3Ghz, 2GB RAM, 15K RPM HD's RAID 1. We also have a Sangoma 4 port T1/PRI card. We are not using G729. Everything is G711. Every call is PRI -> Asterisk G711 -> Sip Carrier We just filled up 2 PRI's and reached a CPU usage of 70%. There's no way we can do 4 PRI's worth of traffic. Will a 2nd CPU

Ok here is a real geek question, I building my own linux kernel for my asterisk system and came across the kernel setting for the timer frequency. I have one of 3 hardcode choices 100Hz, 250 Hz and 1000Hz. From what I understand the default Freq was changed from 100Hz in kernel 2.4 to 1000Hz (1KHz) in kernel 2.6. Timing is a BIG issue in asterisk with all the TDM and zap channel stuff.

Forget the sound card. It isn't related. The subject above should have read 'TE405P No Voice Problem' or something similar. It appears to be a zaptel timing issue, but I have found a workaround. For those of you just tuning in, here is the story: I have a CentOS/Intel 865 box currently running Asterisk 1.2.7.1 and zap 1.2.5, both compiled from the source available off the main

Anyone care to elaborate on the differences between the T400P and the TE405P? -Darren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/e817f8bb/attachment.htm

http://www.mixdown.ca/~asterisk/ The card seems to be working fine. Don't expect warranty on it though. :-) Why? Because I wanted a quad-span T1 card which worked in the high-end systems I was intending it for, but that I could also keep a few in stock and if the system mainboard failed, pull the card an put it in a standard PC system. I didn't want to have to stock 3.3V and 5V

Hi Everybody, Is there anyone who already uses Asterisk with TE405P card? Is this card going well with the old E400P or T400P drivers? Are there a lot of differences? In the card's data sheet writes this sentece: "Digium has designed the TE405P to be fully compatible with existing software applications..." Is this meaning the the old drivers are also OK for this card? Thank you

I understand from the archives that * does this occassionally, but I'm trying to figure out why. * didn't do this at all for two days, and then it's gone and done it 3 times in the past hour. It does not seem to be affecting calls, I'm just curious as to the reasoning behind the B channel resets and why they are so erratic. Regards, Andrew

I have TE405P span connected to a patton/digi 2977 T1/PRI port. Zaptel starts up fine without any errors. Libpri is installed as well. But I get the following when trying to load asterisk ------- Jul 3 19:30:26 ERROR[8192]: Signalling requested is PRI Signalling but line is in Unknown signalling 896 signalling Jul 3 19:30:26 ERROR[8192]: Unable to register channel '25-48' Jul

I'm installing TE405P card. This is my zaptel.conf. -------------------------------------- span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 loadzone = us defaultzone= us -------------------------------------- When i modprobe wct4xxp, -------------------------------------- PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 02:0b.0 PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with

Hi, I havn't E1 board from Digium but I would like to know which is the used IC (chip) for PCI HDLC communication? Best Regards, Miroslav Nachev