similar to: Bad Voice Quality - IAX2 redirect

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Bad Voice Quality - IAX2 redirect"

2006 Nov 04
1
Hairpinning problems using IAX2 and SIP
Asterisk 1.2.7 RedHat 9.0 I frequently have the need to redirect calls that come in on a DiD provisioned by my ITSP, back to the ITSP so that they can terminate the call on the PSTN. For example when an external call comes in, I often have to send it to a cell phone. I believe that this is referred to as "hairpinning" the call. I do this by answering the incoming call and then I use
2006 Nov 04
1
Redirect problems using IAX2 and SIP
Asterisk 1.2.7 RedHat 9.0 I frequently have the need to redirect calls that come in on a DiD provisioned by my ITSP, back to the ITSP so that they can terminate the call on the PSTN. For example when an external call comes in, I often have to send it to a cell phone. I believe that this is referred to as "hairpinning" the call. I do this by answering the incoming call and then I use
2006 Nov 05
1
Call Quality Issues with IAX?
Hey all, I recently got a message from my provider about IAX: > We do not recommend the use of IAX. It is a lossy protocol that is > known to cause crackling, loss of audio and other issues. You can > use IAX if you want, but we will not assist with any issues you may > encounter. Does anyone else know about these "known" problems? I'm not sure where this provided got
2010 Jan 04
1
T.38 ITSP?
Has anyone found an ITSP that will relay T.38 fax to an asterisk 1.6.x instance AND do it reliably? If so, I can think of a number of locations with copper loops that could be scrapped. I'm actually quite surprised at what an underwhelming number of ITSP's that say they support T.38 (zero so far among my normal go-to companies). For locations that just want to be able to send
2006 Nov 29
2
Trouble using 2 IAX2 DiDs provided by different ITSPs
Asterisk 1.2.7 Redhat 9 I have DiDs from two different ITSP both set up as IAX2. Each one works when it's the only one in my iax.conf, but when I have them both defined in iax.conf at the same time, only one will work. My iax.conf is provided below. Any ideas how to fix? I'd like to use both DiDs! Thanks, H My iax.conf is below. When I dial the DiD provided by ITSP_B, the other
2003 Nov 20
5
The internet needs a dialing code..
It seems to me that ITSP's like to use a US dialing code eg 1-xxx Wouldn't it be cool to have an Internet dialing code?? I don't know what the structures are or how the allocations work but it would be so cool to know that 1-xxx was USA , 44-xxx was UK and yy-xxx was an internet phone.. That way the whole internet phone space could be consolidated into a single dialing structure
2015 Jan 01
2
PJSIP / T.38 - Asterisk not passing on v21 preamble and data
Dear list, happy new year! I am still trying to make T.38 work. In the meantime, I have upgraded to Asterisk 13.1.0, and I am using the most recent PJSIP library (compiling that stuff myself). My local fax software is capable of T.38, as is my ITSP; Asterisk sits in the middle, of course. Asterisk is in the same private subnet as the local fax software and talks to the ITSP through a NAT'd
2007 Mar 02
3
Alec Saunders post about Mashable Telco's
Interesting read in Alec Saunders blog today. http://saunderslog.com/2007/03/01/mashable-telcos/ Thought it may interest some people on this list. As food for thought, why it is that ITSP's haven't come up with more 'interesting' voice applications? When asterisk first became available I thought it was the beginning of seeing really neat applications, think Verzion's
2009 Mar 25
8
ITSP's no longer supporting IAX?
After a variety of connectivity problems, my itsp (Unlimitel.ca) blamed the problem on the IAX protocol. They told me that as of Asterisk 1.4 the IAX protocol went downhill and many carriers (like VoicePulse) are discontinuing support for IAX. Is this correct? We are all heading for SIP? Thanks, MD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2005 Aug 05
2
SIP signaling vs Media (Voice) Traffic
I have an Asterisk serving 15 people using the X-Lite soft-phone. Currently they all register to the internal IP address of Asterisk (192.168.1.110). I only use VoIP internally. External calls go PSTN. I'd like to arrange it so that they register to our external WAN address (port forwarded to Asterisk) so that they can go mobile and still have Asterisk service. Is it possible to arrange it
2016 Nov 15
2
iaxmodem errors.
2009 Jul 24
1
EVERY toll free number appears to be in e164.org??
ENUM lookups at e164.org return a IP route for ALL toll-free numbers. I was surprised to observe that ALL toll-free numbers get a hit at e164.org. It appears that ALL toll-free prefixes have been delegated, thereby publishing an IP route for YOUR TOLL-FREE NUMBERS, my toll-free numbers, and even toll-free numbers that have not been allocated. :-) See below Should I care? Even though this
2004 Jan 14
1
Cooperate with SIP ITSP
Hi All, When I want use Asterisk as a PBX to cooperate SIP ITSP, I can not set the caller ID, so SIP ITSP do not accept the call. In Asterisk, I set a account in sip.conf to register on ITSP SIP Server: register => 6292@218.1.121.237/6292 And I added a user 6292 in Asterisk just like the account on ITSP SIP Server: [6291] type=friend username=6291 callerid=6291 host=dynamic
2009 Jun 27
1
2 problems I can't solve without any help
Problem 1 : Incoming conversations from the SIP-provider come into the [default]-context and to the 's'-extension. I am unable to change this, even if I have : sip.conf [general] ;context=default ; Default context for incoming calls register => 092779077:XXXX at 85.119.188.3 ; incoming [092779077] type=user host=85.119.188.3 context=from3starsnet So I define no
2010 Sep 13
3
doing dnsmgr_lookup
Hello list, my CLI is spammed with : [Sep 13 08:31:38] > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'ssw6.itsp.tld' [Sep 13 08:31:38] > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'ssw6.itsp.tld' [Sep 13 08:31:47] > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'ssw4.itsp.tld' [Sep 13 08:31:48] > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'ssw4.itsp.tld' [Sep 13 08:31:49] > doing dnsmgr_lookup for 'ssw4.itsp.tld' [Sep
2006 Mar 20
3
Problem with chan_iax.c implimentation causes bad audio?
I received an e-mail from a vendor who says: "We have recently become aware of an issue in the chan_iax2 implementation of IAX2. This issue leads to degraded audio quality. Due to this we are urging everyone to move to SIP." I don't want to discount what this person is talling me, but I'm curious to know why I would only be having issues connecting to his servers, and also what
2014 Aug 05
1
Binding SIP on multiple ports [SOLVED])
Great ! I'm gonna it try ASAP ! Is there another way (ie not using different ports) to get several trunks to a given ITSP ? Let me explain this a bit further. My setup is: ITSP <---- SIP----> Asterisk <----> Phones For various reasons, I want my Asterisk box to have several trunks/SIP account with my ITSP. First method, is to configure a specific port for each trunk: ITSP will
2020 Jun 22
4
Voice broken during calls (again...)
Am 22.06.2020 um 17:01 schrieb Telium Technical Support: > I don't know if there was a prior email with more details, but.... > > Latency is as important as speed. Have you checked latency between your device and pop? What about QoS at your location, and does your ITSP support/respect QoS? That's a very good idea... Could you suggest me how can I check it? The Gateway is a
2008 Oct 27
1
Forcing repacketization on SIP to SIP call
Hi folks I have a handset talking to Asterisk, which in turn puts the call through to an ITSP. The handsets likes to send audio in 40ms frames (even though Asterisk requests 20ms frames with a ptime header in the SDP). The ITSP doesn't request any particular frame length (with ptime) or state a maximum length (with maxptime), so when Asterisk receives the 40ms media frames from the handset,
2019 Mar 01
2
pjsip: don't require authentication from remote i register to
On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 14:15 -0500, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > you can try line functionality on the outbound registration which > may or may not work[2] (requires the upstream to adhere to the RFC, > which not all do). My provider seems to implement this. However even with the line=... in the: SIP to address: sip:5555551212@<my_IP_address>:5060;line=dpnlyiu res_pjsip is still