similar to: FREE DOWNLOAD - PRI / T1 Circuit monitoring

I posted a new article on linking Asterisk Servers via SIP instead of IAX on my web site. It is newbie driven, but I think useful for many since the information is in one place. Just search 'Linking Asterisk Servers' and all you will come up with is IAX configurations. http://www.siliconvp.us Regards, Paul Norris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Here is the link.. http://sourceforge.net/projects/enhanceme _____ From: Paul [mailto:paul@siliconvp.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:48 PM To: 'asterisk-users@lists.digium.com' Subject: Enchance Me 1.004 Released! Today I released Enhance Me 1.004 for AMP 1.10 and Asterisk @ Home 2.2. These utilities allow for speed dialing, a revised version which

Today I released Enhance Me 1.004 for AMP 1.10 and Asterisk @ Home 2.2. These utilities allow for speed dialing, a revised version which uses AMP to store speed dial numbers and NAMES so that only operators of the web interface can add and delete speed dials. Data is stored in mysql instead of Asterisks' DB. This stops the waste of the 300 series extension numbers. Instructions on

Hello, I have downloaded and burned Suse 9.2 Live CD. The problem is, it won't boot. I get "searching for boot record on CDROM... not found" message and then system just boots from hard drive. Other bootable cdroms work, it's just suse that doesn't. I post this here because suse live cd uses isolinux (isolinux.cfg below). Is there a way to make the cd boot, maybe using

Hi all I'm a programmer at the psychology dept, and last week, I was asked to write an application to analyze some result data from CO2 measurement experiments. I don't want to reinvent the wheel, so before I start custom coding in C, I'd though to look around a bit and bumped into R on freshmeat. basically, it is a 2-column data sheet, with timings on col1 and CO2 value on col2.

I am having a hard time interpreting the phase and coherency plots. x is two timeseries that occur at the same time i.e. a b 1 11.2 12.3 16 11.3 12.4 31 11.4 12.5 46 11.5 12.6 ...etc even though my example is does not show this they are oscillating at more or less the same frequency just shifted by t=x (imagine two sine waves offset with the 2nd sine

I'll keep asking weird questions here: I have two T1 WAN circuits originating at my asterisk box and terminating at Asterisk servers at remote sites. Currently I use zaptel ppp assigned to all 24 channels for data. Now I would like to split off a few of these channels for voice trunks (I should use VOIP, but at the moment I do not have fast enough servers for the codecs) At one site

We are running Asterisk version 1.4.23-1, libpri-1.4.9 and zaptel-1.4.12.1 and two Digium TE220Ps. Debugs are set to 10. We have a T1 PRI connected to the telco. Over the last 4-5 days, we have getting Yellow/Red alarms coming from the T1 PRI. The other two ports in use are connected to internal test switches (Avaya Legend/Avaya Definity), and are not showing any errors.

Hi- Perhaps someone with an E100P in hand can answer this: I just received an E100P from Digium (I normally buy quad boards) I noticed that the circuit board says "T100P" on it, and I assume that the T100P and E100P both use the same circuit board. Can someone please confirm that their E100P says "T100P" on the artwork? Thanks Scott Scott M. Stingel Emerging Voice

I'm trying to hook up a non-PRI fractional T1 using a T400P port. The Telco says that it is provisioned as AMI with SF (not ESF) and that they are signalling by "sending down a straight DS1" (I'm not sure what exactly that means). They are also sending DNIS over these channels. I currently run it through a channel bank for my IVR application and it works fine but I am now

Hello, we've had an Asterisk solution working for quite awhile. Today our IAX2 carrier started reporting circuit-busy to all calls for approximately an hour, which is different than a busy condition. I'm guessing that this indicates the carrier was having an outage, or was handling too many concurrent IAX2 calls. Is there a way to change our dialplan to fail to PSTN in case Dial(*)

I call the firm from my portable at home (zoiper softphone). I have internal extension 60, and I call the internal SIP-client 10 at the firm via an IAX-connection over internet. My colleague at phone 10 answers my call. I ask him to transfer me with my colleague at extension 50. He then presses "transfer" on the grandstream GXP2020 (I get music) and dials the number 50. Phone 50

10.10.2011, 18:29, "David A. Greene" <greened at obbligato.org>: > Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > >>  int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1; >>  bool valid2       = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910; >> >>  Clang, even at -O0, is performing

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 Summary: Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All URL: http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg- src/rsync/rsync.patch.lastmatch OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW

In function read_metadata_vorbiscomment_ from stream_decoder.c, at various locations where we short circuit the computation, we also set `obj->num_comments` accordingly. For example: https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=blob;f=src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c;h=e0f1b14d30dd548268a88e4341af3f38290816e3;hb=HEAD#l1736

Is there any way to disable short-circuit evaluation of expressions in Clang/LLVM? Let's say I have C code like the following: bool validX = get_group_id(0) > 32; int globalIndexY0 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 0 + 1; bool valid0 = validX && globalIndexY0 >= 4 && globalIndexY0 < 3910; int globalIndexY1 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) +

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-02-25 10:05 ------- I considered the short-circuit operators (-! and +!) for filter commands, but I am not convinced of their utility. Do you have an example of a real-life situation that they improve? Note also that the suggested syntax for the new operators is now being used to specify

Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1; > bool valid2       = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910; > > Clang, even at -O0, is performing short-circuit evaluation of these > expressions, resulting in a fair number of branch instructions being >

Hi, I've been trying to get my ADT alarm panel ( Lynx24R ) to work with asterisk and sipura SPA 2000. So far the alarm company has been recieveing lot of undefined events. Someone suggested I should change communication format to 4x2 instead of default Ademco CID. Unfortantely ADT is reluctant to hand me over the information I need. I can change the communication format on the panel since