similar to: Asterisk - big installation

Hello, I try configuring Quintum DX gateway as link to PSTN for *. Now, I can dial number which is connect to Quintum, and call is diverted to *. I don't know what I should set, if I want call from SIP_phone registred in Asterisk to PSTN via Quitnum. I set in sip.conf account for Quintum [sip_proxy-out] type=peer outboundproxy=QUINTUM_IP , and changed extensions.conf. When

oki doki. Thank you for precision. That kind of limitation should be added to the wiki as I would have already tried to move Bind to a non-DC host if I was able to find to to do that. And if I thought about that, some have thought about that before me. With easy virtualisation as we have now, with the idea to separate task one different systems to lower risk endured by each system, it seems to me

R-help, I have a character vector whose elements are the names of matrixes. Something like this: > test <- ls(pattern="Oki") [1] "aaOki" "aOki" "bOki" "c1Oki" "c2Oki" "c3Oki" "cOki" "dOki" "eOki" "fOki" "gprsOki" "hOki"

I am trying to install rJava on a WUBI Ubuntu 11.10 installation of R with no luck. I was originally trying to install the iplots package and encountered this rJava problem. Code used: install.packages("rJava") (CRAN mirrors --Canada(ON) and Canada(QC2) I installed iplots with no problem on Windows 7. I know just about zero about Ubuntu or Linux in general so I have no idea what I

Dear ALL: I find a program named "asterisk_b2bua" on http://developer.berlios.de/projects/b2bua/ And I also download them(two components) and try to test it. But I have not enough knowledge about asterisk. It seems a Software PBX. Does asterisk_b2bua work? Does anybody ever try it? I have questions about my scenario. |======================> UA2

Hello, My problem is the following : I have a Debian (testing distribution) on which I used to have Samba server v3.0.2a it worked perfectly with my other machine which is running Windows 2000. I recently made a global packages update on my Debian machine, which apparently changed the Samba server to 3.0.7 Since then, I have been absolutely unable to retrieve files from the debian server to the

Well, I''m going to release the first version of win32-taskscheduler today. For now, I''ve kept the API about the same as it originally was because I was spending way too much time futzing around and I wanted to get something out the door. For now, I''m calling this a BETA release, with the API subject to change. See the ''Future Plans'' section of

On 01/08/16 14:35, mathias dufresne wrote: > oki doki. Thank you for precision. > That kind of limitation should be added to the wiki as I would have already > tried to move Bind to a non-DC host if I was able to find to to do that. > And if I thought about that, some have thought about that before me. > If you look here:

Hi Guys, In stream_decoder.c when assigning lpc restore function, only IA32 processor benefits from SS2 and SSE4.1 optimization. Shouldn't it be the case for x86_64 processor as well ? Thanks, -- Olivier TRISTAN uvi.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140311/1d49b5c2/attachment.htm

Hi Andrew, Sorry about that but I have to ask: why that would not be an option? 2016-08-01 8:48 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>: > On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 10:34 +0200, mathias dufresne wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Did you tried to use the bind9_10 library? Did it worked? > > If not, the changes to the dlz_minimal.h and the code to match the .h >

Oki Doki. First the fact you can't add new DNS entry in your DNS zones is not a blocking point to remove a DC. It's a blcoking point to add new entries. Now you are the one deciding if you would remove it or not, but seriously, for me that's not a reason to keep up it running: you can replace it by another DC which will do exactly the same job and if you are lucky enough you would be

Thx mathias for your reply First, yes im using internal DNS, i just try to add new dns from other dc but it doesnt work, i think the (maybe) corrupted dns data already sync to other dc And i still run my samba4 installation, because sofar the only problem is, i cant add new dns record In other case i found up one of my team just re install 2 samba4 server in site office with different AD

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefanha at redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 6:31 PM > To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; cavery at redhat.com; > jasowang at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; Wang, Wei W > <wei.w.wang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefanha at redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 6:31 PM > To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; cavery at redhat.com; > jasowang at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; Wang, Wei W > <wei.w.wang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefanha at redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 5:00 PM > To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; cavery at redhat.com; > jasowang at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; Wang, Wei W > <wei.w.wang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefanha at redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 5:00 PM > To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; cavery at redhat.com; > jasowang at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; Wang, Wei W > <wei.w.wang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefanha at redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 6:20 PM > To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; cavery at redhat.com; > jasowang at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; Wang, Wei W > <wei.w.wang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefanha at redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:10 PM > To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; cavery at redhat.com; > jasowang at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; Wang, Wei W > <wei.w.wang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6]

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefanha at redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:10 PM > To: Liu, Changpeng <changpeng.liu at intel.com> > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; cavery at redhat.com; > jasowang at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; Wang, Wei W > <wei.w.wang at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6]

Dear People I have installed wine 1.5.1 and II want to ask How can i run the Diablo-III-8370-enUS-Installer. When I run : wine Diablo III Setup.exe Start the window Checking for udates... And after some seconds appear the error: Failed to run a required program (Agent).... The error number is BLZPTS00007 Some one know how can I fix the issue ? Thanks and best regards