similar to: TDD - stops receiving characters

Sorry, I didn't mention we're using spandsp txfax (0.0.2pre25) to send the faxes. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Warrick Zedi <wzedi@noojeeit.com.au> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Faxing - machines stop talking, line stays up Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:23:08 +1000 Size: 4568 Url:

I can see that Asterisk supports TDD text channels, as there is a tdd.c file in the source, this appears to be exposed via TDD MODE in the AGI interface? I cant find any documentation anywhere on how to use this. Has anyone done this? tdd.c seems to only support 45.5 baud calls. Ideally I'd like a simple TDD answering machine, that sends "PLEASE TYPE MESSAGE" and receives TDD

I went to put in the new sound files over the weekend, but forgot to backup the custom folder and lost my custom digital receptionist files. I then had to copy the old files back from a duplicate machine. The problem is now though that voicemail just hangs up when I dial it. Other apps work - *70 for example gives me 'call waiting...activated' so I know it's accessing the files

I didn't know if it would work or not, but I figured I'd try slow-speed half-duplex TDD over GSM & Vonage. I called a AGI script I have that speaks to TTYs, by calling from Vonage to one of my Voicepulse lines. I don't control the Vonage codec, so I have no idea what it uses, but I am using GSM for the Voicepulse line. Everything worked fine - echo canceling didn't cause any

[snip good stuff] > After that you realize that TDD just makes you happy, so you start to apply it to other aspects of your life. Wait, I thought happiness had something to do with goats and feeling guilty about it. I''m confused. Again. But I would second Dylan''s suggestion of seeing a video of TDD in action w/ RoR. Having never tried this, it''s difficult to

Here is a blog about TDD. http://hl.thoughtworkers.org/?p=7 It talks about starting TDD from writing functional/acceptance tests according to acceptance criteria of stories, then drilling down to the unit tests. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20071017/9bbe579c/attachment-0001.html

I've read the WIKI. Any additional information on the TDD mode? Anyone done a TDD to email app? James Taylor MetroTel 3505 Summerhill Road Suite 11 Texarkana, Tx 75503 903-793-1956

On voip-info I found a few dated references to TDD support being in the alpha stage and buggy. Can anyone direct me to any newer information on this option? Thanks -- Karl Harris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100616/d18f876f/attachment.htm

Hi, I''m learning TDD without using Shoulda or RSpec. When I played with RSpec, there was a tool to show test coverage visually. Is there any similar function built-in to Rails Test::Unit? Or do I need to add it on my own? What''s the recommended tool? I tried `rake -T test`, but didn''t find anything about coverage. -Jon

Mosquito, the TDD framework for Camping has been updated (0.1.3). We''ve tried to keep it backwards compatible, so your apps should continue to work. But feel free to submit a bug report at RubyForge if you have any problems. Changes: http://rubyforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?group_id=351&release_id=14845 Download: http://rubyforge.org/projects/mosquito/ Docs:

I'm working on a setup for a company that needs to be able to handle TDD/TTY calls for the hearing impaired. Is there anything special that I need to consider for this? We're looking at an Asterisk solution for them, the tones need to be stored in the IVR as well as coming across extensions. Any thoughts? Hatton

TDD, SVN and migrations seem to be a natural combination for model development: create a test, add the column with a migration, write the code, and check it all in when you''re done. The trouble is that this ends up creating one migration per field. I guess it''s not horrible in and of itself, but it does have a code smell to it. Has anyone come up with a different way of doing

It seems like half the people on this list are writing a book on Ruby or Rails. For all the hints I''ve seen strewn across the list I have yet to see one that will focus on test-driven development for either Ruby or for Rails. If anyone is looking for a topic, please consider this. I''ve been trying to wrap my brain around the TDD process, but its way of thinking is

Hi All, I have a production server that's running our corporate mail (Cyrus-IMAP). I used to use cpio to archive the mail store, but that's just getting silly now that there's about 40GB that it needs to run through. I tried running rsync in order to backup the data, but as soon as I started running the script the machine came to a grinding halt. I left it running for about 30

Just a thought, it would be interesting to track and graph the number of examples (and number implemented) on a daily basis as a way of tracking a project progress.

The problem I''m having is that I can''t seem to destroy the cookies and assert that they were indeed destroyed inside the test. The code to do this does work - the cookies are created, and are destroyed when this is done in a browser, but I can''t seem to make the test pass. account_signup_test.rb def test_should_pass_if_logout_destroys_cookie_data post :login,

In a method named logo in my application helper, I reference an application controller method (current_account) that has been marked as a helper method with the following syntax: helper_method :current_account When I test out the setup in the browser (without rspec), rails is happy with this setup. However, when I run the spec, the spec won''t pass and gives me the following error:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''ve been working my way through the Agile book and just completed the depot sample application. I learned quite a bit along the way. On page 171 we are led through the creation of a test (that fails) for new code. The new code (a search function) is left as an exercise for the reader. Well, I think I solved it but I''m not

I think that I have found what I consider a bug using smbmount 2.0.05a that came with linux 6.1, and also have a question at the end of this e-mail. I can successfully mount a shared drive from a windows NT machine using the following format. smbmount //computername/sharedfolder /mountpoint -U username%password I can manipulate folders and files from the linux computer with no problem. However

Jean-Marc, I dug into this further, and found that the warning occurred when PSHR32 had a shift greater than 15. in fixed_generic.h, PSHR32 is defined as: #define PSHR32(a,shift) (SHR32((a)+((1<<((shift))>>1)),shift)) For 16-bit compilers the "1" needs a cast: #define PSHR32(a,shift) (SHR32((a)+((EXTEND32(1)<<((shift))>>1)),shift)) This change fixed the