Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "FW: Desktop integration"
2008 Jan 01
2
(no subject)
<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
2006 Nov 13
8
Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066">
<font size="+1">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I am interested in
2006 Nov 02
0
testing
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META
2007 Jun 26
0
number of samples in input_frame
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
That is a dumb question :)<br>
<br>
The encoder expects SPEEX_GET_FRAME_SIZE at all times. If you are
2018 Mar 14
2
Expected performance for WORM scenario
We can't stick to single server because the law. Redundancy is a legal
requirement for our business.
I'm sort of giving up on gluster though. It would seem a pretty stupid
content addressable storage would suit our needs better.
On 13 March 2018 at 10:12, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
wrote:
> Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative
2018 Mar 13
3
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Well, it might be close to the _*synchronous*_ nfs, but it is still well
> behind of the asynchronous nfs performance.
>
> Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture):
>
>
>
> #!/bin/csh
>
>
>
> set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname`
>
> set j=1
2018 Mar 13
1
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache,
> but enabling that did not make much effect).
>
> To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small
> files for obvious reasons:
>
Could you give profile info of the run you did with
2009 Aug 12
0
Unsubscribe Me!
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, but enabling that did not make much effect).
To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small files for obvious reasons:
1. Single server, does not have to deal with distributed locks
2. Afaik, gluster does not support read/write delegations the same way NFS does.
3. Glusterfs is
2010 Apr 01
3
RPID on called party
Hello,
Did anyone manage to force asterisk to put Remote-party-ID attribute on
the SIP outgoing call? I.e. When A calls B, I want that A gets a name of
B displayed on his phone.
Note that name of A gets displayed on the B's phone fine, but this is
not what I want.
This works with Cisco Call manager fine - the RPID is sent as a part of
the response to the SIP INVITE this way:
SIP/2.0 180
2018 Mar 13
5
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>
> I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
>
It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to
NFS now.
Andreas,
Looking at your workload, I am suspecting there to be lot of LOOKUPs
2011 Apr 12
0
No subject
everything I do, but then again, I don't do nearly as much as other posters
on here.
------=_NextPart_000_013D_01CC0684.255307F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
2009 Jan 16
0
No subject
1. a clause in iphone Developpers agreement that forbid applications runnin=
g in background,
2. lack of sip clients.
Now it seems skype is available on iphones.
Has someone tried it ?
Along new skype capabilities in Asterisk, could it be used to hook iphones =
to Asterisk for both inbound and outbound calls ?
Regards
--_000_EC80F07C30CE3E46B2AD6B4407BE086F0C2AAD0242cworksmailcwo_
2009 Jan 16
0
No subject
"Why Siphon doesn't allow to receive a call when it doesn't run
Apple doesn't accept (for the moment) an application runs in the background=
. So, when Siphon doesn't run, the SIP server of your provider doesn't know=
your iPhone."
--_000_EC80F07C30CE3E46B2AD6B4407BE086F0C2AAD0248cworksmailcwo_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
2005 Aug 10
6
USB handset wanted
Hello all asterisk users!
Question: Does anybody know about any good USB handset that would
understand SIP and Asterisk and will run with Linux?
I have found tons of them, but they are mainly only supported in Windows
environment.
I would like to set up new phone system in our company that would be
based on asterisk acting as PBX and SIP.
If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Any
2009 Jul 20
0
No subject
before trying T.38 faxing with or without FFA - it can (possibly) be done,
but it has beaten some folks into the ground trying it.
Could be a codec issue.
------=_NextPart_000_00B5_01CB6F7D.F170FCA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
2009 Jul 20
0
No subject
_____
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of khalid touati
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Time variables in system application
Hi Guys,
i have a weird thing here: when using time variables (%F & %T) in a shell
script, out
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Well, it might be close to the _synchronous_ nfs, but it is still well behind of the asynchronous nfs performance.
Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture):
#!/bin/csh
set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname`
set j=1
while ($j <= 7000)
echo ahoj > test.$HOSTNAME.$j
@ j++
end
rm -rf test.$HOSTNAME.*
Takes 9 seconds to execute on the NFS share, but 90 seconds on
2018 Mar 07
1
gluster for home directories?
Hi,
On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Why do you need to replace your existing solution?
> If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async
> NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS
The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life.
The reason we are also looking into gluster is that we like that it uses
standard components
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
"We have created an easy and cost effective way to have customized
recordings done quickly and with no hassle."
I thought this was rather amusing, as:
1. If you want multiple prompts recorded, you need to submit a new order
for each, which means that even prompts of a couple of words are still
charged at $12. That is NOT cost effective. You could record all your
prompts as a single