similar to: skype and SIP hardware for linux

I'm testing Asterisk at home, crummy connection. Skype works fine for me, but every SIP client, even without using Asterisk, fails to connect. That's ok. Is swapping out SIP for Skype a big deal? Heh, well, I guess it's dead: http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/skype-for-asterisk If I have a really bad connection, can I "downgrade" SIP somehow? I

Looking at: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=10591 What are the steps to install this application? Yes, it's a garbage application, but I'd like to at least give it a go. Looks like msiexec apparently isn't the right approach. Should that be through wcmd instead? thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ msiexec

I ran dovecot -a and the blizzard of data seemed ok to my limited knowledge. Is there another log I should look into to trace this error down? Dovecot and system info: thufir at dur:~$ thufir at dur:~$ dovecot --version 2.0.19 thufir at dur:~$ thufir at dur:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.1

I want to iterate ?nodes? and ?leafs? for a yaml document: thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user.rb user.rb:6: undefined method `[]'' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from user.rb:5:in `each_key'' from user.rb:5 thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user2.rb user2.rb:5: undefined method `[]'' for

What's the difference between user "123" and "devries"? Based on the output here, they seem the same..? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201 password 201 default No Yes 123

To use dovecot-postfix stack with thunderbird, do I put the configuration into /usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/impad.protocol? That would seem to be how the stack is configured. "Thunderbird To use with Thunderbird, edit the file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: protocol imap { ... login_greeting_capability = yes imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep }"

Can I dial directly from the asterisk console with the Dial() application? or, is channel originate preferred: channel originate SIP/thufir extension 18003569377 at outbound thanks, Thufir

After two weeks of reading about asterisk and joining this mailing list, I finally decided jumping on the asterisk bandwagon... Asterisk rocks!!! I have a www.Stanaphone.com SIP (free) for incoming line and a www.VOIPJET.com IAX line for outbound. I also have a www.Vonage.com line (gives me 500 outbound minutes) and a Cingular cell phone (gives me 800 minutes) and I also use Skype fairly

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:46:13 -0500, Andres wrote: > A "sip set debug on" will give you more info on why you are getting the > 404. It probably has to do something with your context/dialplan. on tleilax: tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip set debug on SIP Debugging enabled tleilax*CLI> on doge: thufir at doge:~$ thufir at doge:~$ sudo sipsak -vv -s sip:devries at

Your characterization may be true but Skype works much better than SIP when it comes to sound quality. I have SIP softphone with Asterisk server and Skype on the same workstation. Skype just works better over the same network. Ron On 12/03/2015 9:26 AM, A J Stiles wrote: > On Thursday 12 Mar 2015, Thufir wrote: >> I'm testing Asterisk at home, crummy connection. Skype works fine

My understanding is that, given tables Alpha and Beta that the table which holds the 1-to-1 relation will be called Alpha_Beta (or is it alpha_beta?). So far so good. alpha_beta will have, lets say, two fields: alpha_id and beta_id. Seems that it''d be a good idea for those two fields to form a compound primary key, ensuring there are no duplicates. However, RoR doesn''t

ok, that's really all I need to know. Of course, if anyone else wants to throw in their two cents, don't let me stop you :) -Thufir On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com> wrote: > I'm currently using Asterisk 11.7.0 on a Raspberry Pi 2 Model B with > Ubuntu Server 14.04. > > Works fine! :-) > > Frank > > On Wed,

I'm debating between a cloud PBX or, perhaps, rasberry pi. For a SOHO, maybe three hardphones, rasberry pi would suffice? I would be amazed, but, if so, great. thanks, Thufir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160706/84a0ac7c/attachment.html>

Why is dovecot using Maildir and not IMAP. Or is it using even using Maildir at all? Currently I'm using mailman, postfix and dovecot to manage a mailing list. Mail is sent to thufir at dur.bounceme.net which the "mail server delivery agent stack provided by Ubuntu server team" of dovecot-postfix handles fine, keeping it locally, so far as it goes. The mail ends up in

when running asterisk -r, is there a way to turn off the messages? I didn't find the answer in the man page. thanks, Thufir

I would be very interested in using sipsak for something like this. What have you tried so far? -Thufir On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Olivier wrote: > Thinking over my previous, I wonder if sipsak could be used to send > outgoing SIP NOTIFY messages. > Would both Asterisk and sipsak be able to share networks resources ? > > Thoughts ? > > 2017-01-16 14:10 GMT+01:00 Olivier

I wasn't able to get much out of babytel, beyond the fact that I was, apparently, sending options which is why I'm not getting 200 OK. How can I, generally speaking, ping/telnet or otherwise test the connection to get more data? A connection to this peer directly from a softphone, Jitsi, works fine. linux-k7qk*CLI> linux-k7qk*CLI> sip show peer testcarrier * Name :

Pardon, this might be off-topic. I'm reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_switch For a setup of ~5 agents, would I be wrong in thinking that a generic 16 port unmanaged switch would fit the bill? The first model to come up for me in an Amazon search is: http://support.netgear.com/product/fs116 Is this a reasonable choice? Would I be wrong in thinking that most any Fast

If your phones support PoE, I have had huge success with Zyxel: http://www.amazon.com/ZyXEL-ES1100-16P-16-Port-Ethernet-Unmanaged/dp/B00 5GRETMM/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1426296572&sr=8-3&keywords=zyxel+poe If you want to go even cheaper, I have successfully used these as well: http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-8-Port-100Mbps-Switch-TPE-S44/dp/B000QYEN

On 22/03/15 03:03, thufir wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:33:13 -0500, Brian Franklin wrote: > >> If your phones support PoE, >> >> I have had huge success with Zyxel: >> http://www.amazon.com/ZyXEL-ES1100-16P-16-Port-Ethernet-Unmanaged/dp/B00 >> 5GRETMM/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1426296572&sr=8-3&keywords=zyxel+poe >> >> If you want to go