similar to: Binding a peer context to a specific IP address

Hello, I am looking to purchase a new quad-band cellphone and I'm looking for one with WiFi and enough CPU power for stable SIP calls. I was wondering if anyone here can share his experience and recommend on a good cellphone. Any chance there is such a phone with even good WiFi profiles management or am I asking for too much now? :-) Thanks, Tomer.

Its not quad band and in my opinion doesn't perform well enough to be used for anything but basic email and phone calls. This phone, even on the newest version of firmware (Sprint) hangs when syncing with exchange to the point where you miss calls even though you tried to answer them. If you turn on wifi or Bluetooth, it simply compounds the problems. It will also require (literally) a

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi List, FYI. We have been using CentOS 6.4 and have 2 vpn/gre tunnels to separate cisco rtrs using ospf. with kernel 2.6.32-358.23.2 We have upgraded to 6.5 bit using kernel 2.6.32-431.5.1 and the exact same configuration scripts for our vpn/gre tunnels. What I see is the first gre tunnel works great and I get an ospf neighbor. The second tunnel comes up and I can ping across it and I see

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Can anyone tell me under what circumstances checksum offloading might cause problems? I have the following configuration: 1. Remote router (OpenWRT) with PC''s on the LAN and a GRE tunnel to the head office 2. Central office with a server running Xen 3.1.2. Dom0 is doing PPPoE and is terminating the GRE tunnels 3. Main corporate application running on a Linux DomU, accessed via ssh. The

Hi, I have two systems each with 2 two gre tunnels over ipsec. The tunnels are setup to loadbalance using ''ip route''. Using ping from one server to the other I get equal results via the two gre tunnels, but when I try a large ftp transfer the utilization of one tunnel is 90% and the other 10%. The two interfaces are both 100/full. What would be the reason for this, or would

Hi , I am trying to set up a GRE tunnel between two linux routers. The routers have a 400 MHz Processor. Linux .2 65.0.0.2 Linux LAN1 -------- Router -------- INTERNET ---- Router ---- LAN2 10.10.10.0 .1 208.1.0.1 (Simulated) .1 .1 192.168.2.0/24 /24 Scripts to Create the tunnel ip tunnel add tun0 mode gre remote 65.0.0.1 local

Hi, I have recently updated one of my systems from CentOs 6.4 to CentOS 6.5. This systems is used as a RIPv2 routing server with quagga which is the termination point of some GRE tunnels. While running CentOS 6.4 I see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 and the GRE tunnel interface. While running under CentOs 6.5 I can see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 but not on the GRE

Hi, Does anyone tried to get ipip or gre tunnel behind NAT environments. ? i''m trying to make both side tunneling with ipip or gre with private address just like belows.. A -------------------FIRWWAL -------------------INET ------------------- B PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC (10.100.0.1) (211.xxx.xxx.xxx) (

Hi Guys, Here is our patch to allow broadcast packets over a GRE tunnel. Hopefully it might be accepted into the source someday. You need to enabled bridging and GRE tunnels in your kernel. No other options are required. The gre patch determines what type of protocol type to put in the GRE header based on the whether the packet is forwarded from a bridge or not. To use the patch: # Create

First of all, I''d like to thank Andy Furniss for his direction and for helping me get a working example up and running. For the following set up to work, you will need a linux computer at the ISP (server), a linux computer at the client location (client), and some a public range of IP''s you plan to send down to your client. (as this configuration involves patching the linux

Hello, I''ve set up a GRE tunnel between two Linux boxes and it''s working well, with or without IPSEC (under GRE). The problem is that when I have no traffic for some minutes, side A cannot communicate to side B any more, unless side B tries to communidate to side A. The same thing happens in the other direction. For example, side A pings side B. No reply. Keep pinging. Side B

Hello, I have a VM where I would like to setup a secondary interface which has an IP on a remote lan ideally with GRE. I have a simple GRE tunnel from dom0 to a cisco at the remote site, the tunnel works great I have routes in and I can ping between both sides dom0 and the remote router/lan. I had planned on just bridging the GRE interface with a new empty bridge then have the VM attach to that

I want to send a multicast packet to multiple gre tunnel, but the packet only went to where the routing table configured to. ex. when use ip route add 224.0.0.0/4 via gre0 then the packet go to gre0 when use ip route add 224.0.0.0/4 via gre1 then the packet go to gre1 when use ip route add 224.0.0.0/4 nexthop via gre1 nexthop via gre0 then the packet go to either gre or gre1

Hi, I am trying to get information on out-of-sequence packets being dropped on my load balanced multilink router. Can anyone give me any information on how best to log/track such packets? The router is based on Leaf Bering uClib 2.4 (kernel 2.4.26) The load balancing is being done using teql over a number of gre tunnels, each on a separate ethernet ADSL to a central box where the gre

We''re trying to figure out how to have equal cost multipath routing using OSPF (quagga) and have come up with the following... Has anyone done something similar? -- How do you deal with incoming services (mail/web/etc) in such a scenario as below - And does anyone have any suggestions? There''s more detail below.... Diagram and overview: Network A connects to Core1 and Core2

Hi! I read http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q4/006244.html and I did that. Can anyone tell me if there is something else to do for shapeing over tunnels to work? I noticed that gre interfaces don''t have a queue attached. I''m running linux-2.6.15 and iptables-1.3.4 with no patches. Thank you in advance, Sorin.

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the