similar to: Videoconferencing solutions with Asterisk-

Hello everybody, i am searching a solution for a videoconferencing, Any solution (Free/commercial). Asterisk is a great software, but recently we have more and more demands about videoconferencing of 3 or more peoples, Existing solutions are heavy and costly, around 2500? for 1 client. This is insane. Is there any solutions out there for non millionaires ? Or even Free ? I remember a company who

Hi Allen, > Speaking of video conferencing in conjunction with Speex, we are > currently beta testing a solution we developed that offers multi-point, > multi-party video and audio using the Speex engine for voice. I have visit your website and the solution looks interesting for big entities. Of course it is comercial, so it's not in my scope. I'm taregeting smal entities. Some

Hi Carsten, due to the ongoing discussion on both lists, i simply respond to both lists. it's hard crossposting, but it's for both roups relevant (i think). <p>+After having thought about control structures, it makes sense to me to do the extra work and merge this creamed cake into a jabber server component. Otherwise a control channel to the server component would have to be

Hi all, <p>i have send a mail to the jabber mailing list and ask them how to send speex data with the jabber instant messaging protocol. I have added the mail adter this one. If someone here has any experience with jabber and speex please let me know. Thanks, <p><p>Carsten Breuer ====================================================== Hi all, im new on this list, so i want to

I would like to participate also. Tony T. ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.K. Lin" <jk@pageshare.com> To: <speex-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [speex-dev] Videoconferencing with speex and jabber <p>> Me, me, me, me too. > I would love to use it if there is one ;-) > (I wish I can contribute more, but Windows is

Any recommendations for a VoIP provider in the UK? I have a few guys in a field office in the UK with SIP phones and a VPN tunnel back to a working Asterisk setup in the US. The Asterisk setup has an IAX trunk with TelaSIP/VoipXpress with local DiD's for US offices, so they can call vendors, customers etc in the US at local rates. I'd like to get the same thing for the UK, so that UK

> to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++ > component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode > 100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME At low bit-rate (6-8 kbps) and lowest complexity, it's probably possible to encode 100 streams on a 3 GHz machine (and decoding is cheap), but that's all

Hi Ulrich, <p>you distroyed my evening today ;-). Im only sitting here and follow the videoconferencing thread ;-)). > due to the ongoing discussion on both lists, i simply respond to both > lists. it's hard crossposting, but it's for both roups relevant (i > think). Yes, this was right. There is a great discussion and perhaps we got some points more yet. > +After

Hi Jean-Marc, <p>>>to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++ >>component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode >>100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME > At low bit-rate (6-8 kbps) and lowest complexity, it's probably possible > to encode 100 streams on a 3 GHz machine (and

Speaking of video conferencing in conjunction with Speex, we are currently beta testing a solution we developed that offers multi-point, multi-party video and audio using the Speex engine for voice. http://www.wiredred.com/downloads/ecsetup.exe The fair and good audio settings are Speex narrowband, high quality is HawkVoice and toll quality is PCM. -----Original Message----- From:

Hello, Has anyone used Polycom's VSX line of videoconferencing equipment with Asterisk? It seems some of their models, namely the newer VSX 5000, supports SIP. -- The Internet used to be a lot of smart people sitting at dumb terminals, but now its a lot of dumb people sitting at smart terminals!

Me, me, me, me too. I would love to use it if there is one ;-) (I wish I can contribute more, but Windows is not my expertise :-( ) -- jk <p>> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org]On > Behalf Of Carsten Breuer > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:22 PM > To: speex-dev@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [speex-dev]

Is it possible for Asterisk to set the ptime attribute on outbound calls in SDP invite? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060405/7e1e68d1/attachment.htm

> First i want to say that libspeex produce defently too much > errors. I think it was written by a mathematician, right ;-)). No, it was written by an electrical engineering Ph.D. student (i.e. me). Note that if you are that concerned with warnings (and code quality I hope), perhaps the best thing to do is start using *stable* versions. If you use a stable version (1.0.2, but I'll

Hello Jean-Marc, Regarding your question - a little background on the various choices, Fair Quality is 15kbps Speex narrowband, Good Quality is 24kbps Speex narrowband, High Quality is 32kbps ADPCM from HawkVoice and Toll Quality is 64kbps PCM. We also have 10 other codecs within the product including GSM, LPC and others that we currently do not expose. To us, quality is a combination of

Hi all, First of all, I want to say that I really appreciate all the work that's gone into LLVM, clang and the ORC API. I would be very unlikely to be doing my current project if they weren't available. I'm using the ORC API to JIT some C code (soon to be C++) on Windows. (I was on LLVM 8.0.0 but it didn't handle the 'allocator' attribute so I upgraded to LLVM 9.0.0.)

Hi all, <p>im new on the list and want to introduce my self. Im a software developer working on engine control software for a german car manufacturer. I want to use speex for a privat videoconferencing project and faces some problems with it. First of all the projects in Visual-C++ doesn't work. I don't mean the path an dependecy problems. That is easy. But there are some errors.

Who's "shouting" here? Even in complete lines, 9 consecutive words! PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT: Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at: clang: note: diagnostic msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.c clang: note: diagnostic msg: C:\Windows\Temp\crash-74a40f.sh clang: note: diagnostic msg: ******************** --- crash-74a40f.c ---

Le mar 18/11/2003 à 17:39, Allen Drennan a écrit : > Speaking of video conferencing in conjunction with Speex, we are > currently beta testing a solution we developed that offers multi-point, > multi-party video and audio using the Speex engine for voice. > > http://www.wiredred.com/downloads/ecsetup.exe > > The fair and good audio settings are Speex narrowband, high quality

"David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Context is everything. I'm willing to accept your humble apologies. > Spotting the relevant details in long build output > can be tricky & some emphasis (caps, the *** borders, etc) can be useful. So you dare to "shout" at your users/customers, but mock when someone (me) uses the same sort of emphasis,