Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[OT] Nokia E60/61/70 and SIP"
2009 Dec 23
1
Problems with chan_sip
Calling my home numbers has always worked. Till now. The Asterisk CLI
show the following :
[Dec 23 10:53:22] NOTICE[25159]: chan_sip.c:12640 handle_response_invite: Failed to authenticate on INVITE to '<sip:092xx90xx at 85.xx.xx.xx>;tag=as5b139383'
And after restarting Asterisk, the CLI is flooded by :
[Dec 23 11:11:06] WARNING[1468]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of
2006 Jun 11
2
Nokai E60 and E61 , working fine with Asterisk , with new access points
Hi
Was able to communicate clearly with e60 and E61
with asterisk with new access point , even though the
access point security setting was of ?opennetworks? ,
the previous one was of ?WEP? , I feel this was a
major hurdle in communication , now I can clearly
accept and make calls using Nokia E60 and E61
devices
Next I will be trying to find out how to
make this device work
2010 Aug 02
1
SIP Status: 401 Unauthorized (0 bindings)
Hi,
I have made a fresh install of asterisk-1.6.2.10 and when I register my
soft phone it gives following error. Rest are default configurations.
32.454370 MY_IP -> ASTERISK_SERVER_IP SIP Request: REGISTER
sip:ASTERISK_SERVER_IP
32.454505 67.19.43.202 -> MY_IP SIP Status: 401 Unauthorized (0
bindings)
36.454814 MY_IP -> ASTERISK_SERVER_IP SIP Request: REGISTER
2006 May 31
2
Nokia E60 , experience as SIP client
Hi
I want to check out from the members , about their
experience with Nokia E60 phone as SIP client , I was
able to register the phone , but my voice gets
broken during the calls . My other Wi-Fi VoIP SIP
phone are working fine
I also like to check out is there any other mobile
manufacture who have SIP supported porducts like Nokia
e-60
Thanks
2006 Dec 04
1
Nokia E60 problems
Hi,
I am testing Nokia E60 with Asterisk. And I noticed that if another side
is busy, nokia is still calling (I hear alerting), it do not show that
another side is busy. Maybe somebody has noticed the same problem too adnd
solved this one. I made the same tests with Xlite and don't have any
problems like nokia.
Please help me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2007 May 14
1
OT (semi) E60 problem
Hello again gurus.
I have been using Asterisk with great results going on a couple of
years now.
My primary box is running asterisk 1.42 built from a tar ball on Mac
OSX 10.4.9.
I have a very odd issue that I cannot seem to nail down, which is
related to my Nokia E60 SIP phone.
I use the E60 with very good results (latest firmware) from several
locations.
Basically it works fine from
2007 Apr 16
2
[OT] Nokia E60 firmware update break SIP
Just a warning for you all that are using Nokia series E phones for SIP
function.
I updated my phones firmware today using the Nokia Updater, and now
the SIP functionality, which previously worked pretty well is
completely broken.
The phone no longer registers with asterisk, although it displays the
little icon as though it has, and it doesn't even seem to try to pass
calls to
2019 Jan 04
1
Feature request: client bind address for replication
Hi
would it be possible to consider a new parameter for replication:
doveadm_local_ip which allows the source ip address to be set when
connection to a remote dovecot for replication?
It could be useful when the network interface has multiple ips and a
specific one is used for mail services. See attached proposal. I tested
against 2.2.36 only. It applies correctly against 2.3.4 with a warning,.
2007 Mar 23
1
upload progress bar don''t work...please help
Hello,
I''m trying to install the upload_progress gem and i can''t see the upload
progress status.
My config is :
apache2 with mod_proxy
mongrel
rails
upload.rb : ##############
require ''rubygems''
require ''drb''
require ''gem_plugin''
GemPlugin::Manager.instance.load ''mongrel'' => GemPlugin::INCLUDE
2013 Nov 18
3
Is it possible to evaluate a string as a parameter name?
Hi,
I''m looking to combine a couple of fact names with the value of a class
parameter to create and lookup the resulting fact''s value. Is that
possible? For example, my class will take the parameter "my_default_nic"
from beyond. So I know that as long as $my_default_nic exists on the
client, then so will facts like macaddress_<NIC>, netmask_<NIC>,
2008 Aug 21
2
Problem with multiple Dovecot Instances
Hello,
first i want to say that i never used a mailing list before, so if i made
something wrong do not hesitate to contact me via e-mail.
I try to set up multiple Dovecot instances running at the same time. Goal
is to provide IMAPS with a valid SSL Certificate on selected IP Addresses.
To reach this i want to set it up as follows:
1 Dovecot Daemon listening on localhost (for webmail),
2006 Dec 11
6
load balacing with https home banking
Hello everybody.
I''m running linux 2.6.19 with nth match to
alternatively snat outgoing connections to
two different ip addresses for load balancing
between two adsl lines:
Here is:
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m
multiport --dports 80,443 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 -j SNAT --to
adslA
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m
multiport
2005 Jan 01
2
htb bridge problem, please chceck my config
hello. i have following setup:
a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge
with
2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network)
machine does not have any IP
there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2
eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0
i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has
1mbit
all our IP addresses are public and we have the
2004 Sep 02
1
nat with limitation
Hу здpаcте shorewall-users,
i''m not subscribed to the mailing list so...
how can i say to shorewall to do something like this
iptables -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 --dst ! 10.0.0.0/8 -j SNAT my_ip
well the main part is - "--dst ! 10.0.0.0/8". Do i need to create my own rules
at startup (how? or do i need to worry not to break some shorewall rules)
or shorewall can be
1998 Jul 09
4
What is someone looking for??
I am currently blocking out netbios UDP port 137 on my firewall and was
wondering what the following means in terms of security:
Jul 9 16:19:05 oscar kernel: IP fw-in rej eth0 UDP SOMEONES_IP:137
MY_IP:137 L=78 S=0x00 I=46484 F=0x0000 T=111
I have gottena few 100 of these and was wondering if there are some
vulnerabilties related to netbios out there?? What do the S/I/F/L fields
stand for?? I
1999 Oct 29
1
LinuxBox can't appear in Net neighbourhood.
I have samba 2.0.5 run on my RH6.1
In windoz,when I use "find computer",I can find it without any difficulty!
Also I can access it using this method!
But I can't see it in network neighbourhood!
I've tried "net view /workgroup=MY_LINUXBOX_DOMAIN",still can't see.
Why?(In my linuxbox,the dns resolve doesn't work.does that matter?)
The following is my global
2015 Oct 13
2
Dualstack IPv4/IPv6 setup with directors
Hi,
still using 2.2.9, I've two directors, and these directors
use both IPv4/IPv6 addresses.
`host directors.<domain>` returns one A and AAA for each
of the two directors:
directors.<domain> has address 149.x.y.96 (director1)
directors.<domain> has address 149.x.y.97 (director2)
directors.<domain> has IPv6 address
2008 Nov 08
1
dovecot Digest, Vol 67, Issue 19
Thanks Buddy,
I got it working. It was giving error when running make 'undefined
reference to `request_init' etc' then I ran it with gmake LDFLAGS+=-lwrap
and it worked and everything is working fine. Thanks again for your help
Thankyou
Tahir Riaz
Assistant Director (Systems)
COMSATS Internet Services
COMSATS Headquarters Building
9, Shahrah-e-Jamhuriat, G-5/2
Islamabad.
2006 Jun 15
1
Broken on upgrade, "Protocol not supported"
Hello, and thanks in advance for your help. I was having trouble with
dovecot-1.0beta2 after it worked flawlessly since January. Thunderbird
was complaining that dovecot was not returning proper mail server
capabilities (its log seems to confirm this). I checked the dovecot
site and saw a new beta (beta9) with lots of bug fixes, so I downloaded
it and installed it.
The configure and make
2015 Oct 13
0
Dualstack IPv4/IPv6 setup with directors
On 13 Oct 2015, at 22:31, Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> still using 2.2.9, I've two directors, and these directors
> use both IPv4/IPv6 addresses.
>
> `host directors.<domain>` returns one A and AAA for each
> of the two directors:
>
> directors.<domain> has address 149.x.y.96 (director1)