similar to: Is it still possible to use should_have_rjs

Hi, I''m trying to spec a controller method which renders some rjs as part of a render :update block. The problem I''m having is that stub_render or expect_render don''t seem to allow and_return to work. The controller method does: if @thing.save render :update do |page| page.insert_html :bottom,

Hey gang, I have this dead-simple method defined in a helper: def add_category_link(name) link_to_function name do |page| page.insert_html :bottom, :categories, :partial => ''category'', :object => Category.new end end Where, and mostly how, would I spec this? I haven''t been able to find how to stub the rjs in a helper spec, so

Hi I just wondered if there was a reason why Rails controller specs are not shareable? eg describe "All XHR POSTs to /gap/calculate_quote", :shared => true do controller_name :gap # ... end describe "XHR POST /gap/calculate_quote with valid details" do it_should_behave_like "All XHR POSTs to /gap/calculate_quote" # ... end blows up with

Pretty simple question, I''ve tried to ajaxify some actions and the first one I did was a delete - def delete_job ..... render :update do |page| page.remove "job_#{id}" end .... end and in my functional test I call this function via post def test.... post :delete_job, :id => 1 assert_response :success ...... end after the assert_response, how do I test that the page

Hello, > > I couldn''t find much info on this. > > How do you rspec this: page.form.reset("form") > > I looked in the have_rjs source code and I can''t find anything on form > reset. > > Thanks, > > -- > Andrei > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have seen it in 3.0.9 doc ( http://apidock.com/rails/v3.0.9/ActionDispatch/Assertions/SelectorAssertions/assert_select_rjs ) but it''s not mentioned in the latest guide ( http://guides.rubyonrails.org/testing.html#integration-testing-examples) if deprecated how can I check the view from an Ajax call ( assert_match + gsub could work ? ... ) am I missing any doc ? xhr :get, :change_area,

I wanted to use ARTS to add RJS in a behaviour driven way to my application, but I''m having some trouble asserting a replace_html with a partial. I''ve created a pastie (http://pastie.caboo.se/60694) which contains the RJS I want to spec, the spec which I already wrote and its failure message. I''m currently using RSpec-0.9.2

Hi I have a simple controller method like this: class StylesheetsController < ApplicationController layout nil session :off def gap site = Site.find_by_hostname(request.host) @colours = site.colours respond_to do |accepts| accepts.css { render :file => "#{RAILS_ROOT}/app/views/ stylesheets/gap.rcss" } end end end And I want to test that

What''s the status on a rake task for the story runner. If nothing is in progress, where could I start to try and build one? JD

Hi I''ve got a problem validating a boolean and I can''t see what the problem is. Here''s my model: class FinanceAgreement < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :asset validates_presence_of :finance_company validates_inclusion_of :balance, :in => 0.01..10_000_000 validates_inclusion_of :term, :in => 1..600 validates_numericality_of

Hi again... This is wierd spec problem no. 3. I''ve got a simple one line RJS file that renders a partial specified by the controller page.replace_html("product_info", :partial => @product_partial) The partials in question will contain purely static content - the idea is to have some dynamic links, so you hit http://localhost:3000/gap/product_info/product_1

Hi How can I test this kind of RJS code? page.select ''#id .class''.each do |element| element.removeClassName(''whatever'') end I know that should_have_rjs admits a block, but i don''t know exactly which is its purpose. And I can test that the "select" part is beign called, but I don''t know hot to test the "removeClassName"

What''s the current best practice for spec''ing (and stubbing) RJS? response.should have_rjs(*args, &block) from rspec_on_rails works well for things that assert_select_rjs supports. But for other things, like say page[:elm].add_class_name :class_name, it''s not clear to me the best way to test for this. I''d love to be able to do something like

Do I need to spec an AR. If yes, what is the best way to spec this. here is the code - def index @deals = Deal.paginate(:all, :conditions => prepare_search_conditions, :order => ''created_at DESC'', :page => params[:page] ) if request.xhr? render :update do |page| page.replace_html "table", :partial =>

If you missed it, I''ve written a plugin for testing RJS that uses (basically) the same syntax as the RJS templates themselves. Here''s a taste: assert_rjs :alert, ''Hi!'' assert_rjs :assign, ''a'', ''2'' assert_rjs :call, ''foo'', ''bar'', ''baz'' assert_rjs :draggable,

I''m having a bunch of testing an RJS action. The action updates a DIV if it exists, but it isn''t always necessarily present on the page so I use a page.select in the RJS to check if it exists. (Is there a better way to do that?) Let''s say we have an RJS page containing: page.select("some_element_that_may_or_may_not_exist").each do |value|

Hi folks. I''m trying to work out how to verify that a controller has called a render:update block similar to: render :update do |page| page.replace_html ''edit'', :partial => ''form'', :locals => { :operation => ''edit'', :submit_button_value => ''Update'' } end We used to test this with something