similar to: XO SIP Origination Services

I have an XO t-1 line which includes VOIP on 5 lines. When a call comes in, it drops the bandwidth on the t1 and when the call is over bandwidth is restored. The provided a channel bank which does this. My question is, if I use asterisk, then am I losing double bandwidth for each call? For example the only way I guess I can connect to the lines is from the 66block they provided which

Hi, I have an odd problem where when a call is made to any landline phone the callerid number shows up on the caller id device with no problems. However when I call a cell phone from Sprint or Verizon it always shows up as unavaliable. I've tried multiple cell phones from each carrier. Though today I called a t-mobile phone and the callerid came through fine. Is this an * level problem

Almost all DID providers refer to XO and L3. Are they the only sources for DIDs in USA and everybody has to go to them? Could someone explain how exactly it works? Thanks -- Zeeshan A Zakaria -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070531/170b14cb/attachment.htm

There was recently a question on the R-help list about the eee pc. I had a related question about the XO laptop from OLPC (laptop.org). Has anyone looked at the development environment sufficiently to determine if it would be possible to create an executable image for R? The laptop itself only supports Python, Javascript, etc. but it is running a real Linux operating system.

As far as video playback is concerned, it seems to mostly come down to how the video is compressed - although Gnash (the open flash player) still has a ways to go to play flash media as well as the closed source flash players. For the Colingo activity and library, we've found it very difficult to find optimum settings for flash and instead have decided to go with Theora. We've managed to

Hello All, Anyone out there using ISDN PRI from either MCI or XO/Allegiance? Gotta make the choice today and the difference per month is only about $25 in favor of MCI. Billing is pretty much the same between the two so I have pretty much no point of reference on which to choose. Any thoughts from anyone experienced with these two compnies would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Wiley

I'm trying to get "blind transfer" from an incoming DAHDI line to an external number to work on an * 1.6 install using a T1 from XO. The documentation is very "distributed" and incomplete, so while it's not working, it's definitely more likely my error somehow. Couple questions if anybody is out there who even knows what TBCT is. 1) Is this even

I am the IT Manager for an international company who preserves its competitive edge by cutting costs. We are moving to a new office in about two months, and naturally, Asterisk came to mind as a way to implement a VoIP setup at low cost. My expertise is computers, not telephones, so all of this is new to me. I need to know what the ideal setup for an Asterisk set up is. My idea is to have our

XO CAN supply callerid NAME on a NI2 PRI connection. We have three of them and they work great. Its takes a little doing to get to someone at XO that knows what they are doing but XO does have some VERY good tech support people that know how to get things done. It just takes a bit of work to find them. Outgoing CNAM is a different beast however. They can't take it via IE. You need to get

Dear R users, Could somebody please help me to find a way of comparing nonlinear, non-nested models in R, where the number of parameters is not necessarily different? Here is a sample (growth rates, y, as a function of internal substrate concentration, x): x <- c(0.52, 1.21, 1.45, 1.64, 1.89, 2.14, 2.47, 3.20, 4.47, 5.31, 6.48) y <- c(0.00, 0.35, 0.41, 0.49, 0.58, 0.61, 0.71, 0.83, 0.98,

Hi all, I've got a problem with the nls function. I have an adjustment which works when I fix one of the argument of my function (Xo=150) : *Xo*=150 f<- function (tt*,Xo*,a,b) ifelse(tt<*Xo*,a*exp(-b**Xo*),a*exp(-b*tt)) ajust<-nls(RER~f(tt,*Xo*,a,b),data=data.frame(tt=Ph2[,2*k],RER=Ph2[,2*k+1]),start=list(a=0.5,b=0.014)) But, when I use it as a "normal" parameter (and

--- inspector/inspector.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/inspector/inspector.c b/inspector/inspector.c index 3583c61df..30d279987 100644 --- a/inspector/inspector.c +++ b/inspector/inspector.c @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ output_root (xmlTextWriterPtr xo, char *root) char buf[32]; char *canonical_root; size_t size; + int is_bsd; XMLERROR

I'm starting to look into binary instruction encodings in TableGen, and I'm a bit confused on how the instruction fields are populated. Perhaps I'm just being dense, but I cannot see how SDAG operands are translated into the encoding fields. Can someone please explain the following snippet from the PPC back-end. The AND instruction in PPC is defined as: 1011 def AND :

Hi guys, My name is Adir. I'm a Google Summer of Code student, and in addition to that I will be working both with Xiph.org and with OLPC on optimizing Theora's performance. I'm in the list to get a shiny B4, but at the moment I can't do anything since sending the laptop to my place involves some difficulties. Until I get the laptop, I would like to hear from any of you, XO users

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:25:14PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > I'm starting to look into binary instruction encodings in TableGen, and I'm > a bit confused on how the instruction fields are populated. Perhaps I'm > just being dense, but I cannot see how SDAG operands are translated into > the encoding fields. Can someone please explain the following snippet from

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:25:14PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > I'm starting to look into binary instruction encodings in TableGen, and > I'm > > a bit confused on how the instruction fields are populated. Perhaps I'm > > just being dense, but I cannot see how SDAG

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 06:55:53PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Thursday, 5 October 2017 17:36:09 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > --- > > inspector/inspector.c | 12 +++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/inspector/inspector.c b/inspector/inspector.c > > index 3583c61df..30d279987 100644 > > ---

Hi, I am trying to restrict a data set so as not to included outliers. Specifically, I would like to specify a percentage where a fraction of observations are eliminated from the data set, much in the same way that the trimmed mean function works - but leaving the restricted data set intact. I have been using a function which will restrict the data set using: > trim=function(x,p){ >

From: Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> I faced with situation where libguestfs cannot recognize partitions on a disk image which was partitioned on a system with "4K native" sector size support. In order to fix the issue we need to allow users to specify desired physical and/or logical block size per drive basis. It is definitely not a complete patch but rather a way to

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 24, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Justin Holewinski < > justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:25:14PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: >> > I'm