similar to: RE : Re: [Serusers] CDRTool +Asterisk + Ser

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "RE : Re: [Serusers] CDRTool +Asterisk + Ser"

2006 Jun 22
2
*** Spam *** Don't use CDRTool From AG-projescts
This post cannot be left without comment. People who don't know you or Adrian might get a wrong impression. I know Adrian quite well and know that he is one of the real experts in this industry and he and his stuff does not deserve such a treatment. I would recommend that you change your attitude. It seems like you did not get what you want (for free) and you complain like a small child. An
2006 Jun 24
0
CDRTool +Asterisk + Ser
Hello, I try to configure CDRTool + Asterisk . After having fixed a lot of files I get too many problems with this software. First I get this error why ? Error: Table 'asterisk_cdr' was not locked with LOCK TABLES The basic soap client does not connect to the soap server to get the version . harry
2006 Jun 22
4
Don't use CDRTool From AG-projescts
hello to all, I advice you to not use CDRtool from ag-projects : Fisrt ag-projects talk about is product like a gpl software however they don't provide at least some documentation for non commercial users . try to call them !! i'll offer you some money . You can not Call them for some advices ... It's really a bad product don't waste your time to setup it. this enterprise must
2004 May 31
0
Fwd: [Serusers] CDR mediation for VoIP
FYI, for those of you who aren't on the serusers list. I'd like to hear how others can get this working in small Asterisk settings; I don't really have the time to implement it, but it looks very interesting. JT >To: serusers@iptel.org >From: Adrian Georgescu <ag@ag-projects.com> >Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 23:05:47 +0200 >Subject: [Serusers] CDR mediation for VoIP
2006 Jun 22
0
CDRTool / asterisk billing based on realtime
Hello, I read ag-projects it does'not provide support for its cdrtool pseudo gpl licensed . It's one of the bad open source project even seen . No documentation ... A real bad project !! Don't waste time with that Anybody could advise me a billing system based on cdr records with realtime support cdr_obdc.so? Regards Harry
2006 Apr 26
0
Re: [Serusers] Sip t38 gateway tests
Thanks for these informations I would have prefer to receive them from asterisk-users instead of serusers !! May be they are sleeping . Ok i have not installed spandsp because of i don't find some scripts like in hylafax for mail2fax fax2mail i've just patched chan_sip.c Regards Harry --- Alexandr Dubovikov <shurik@start4.info> a ?crit : > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:27:01AM
2005 Jan 07
0
Re: [Serusers] softphones
Hi I tried Xten, its very good, because it can stay in the taskbar (next to the clock) and start when windows starts, and is allways ready to receive calls. Maybe it s the best way to introduce VoIP to my company workers.... But theres a feature that s missing (or I couldnt find), there s no way to connect this softphone with the adress book. I think this feature is very important, because
2005 Jul 05
0
Re: [Serusers] NAT considerations...
You will also need your SIP clients that are behind the same NAT to support ICE (Interactive Connectivty Establishment) if you want calls between them. Xten Eyebeam and Snom phones are the only ones I'm aware of that support it. On 7/5/05, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez@redvoiss.net> wrote: > And even worst. > There are some kind of NAT that STUN does not work. > You can check
2005 Jun 28
0
RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk
Sorry it's asterisk-users@lists.digium.com --- harry gaillac <gaillacharry@yahoo.fr> a ?crit : > Luca, > > you may find help here: > > http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~somlo/CSU-SIP-notes/ > http://www.asteriskdocs.org/ http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+at+large > > ask for help to asterisk-users@lists.digium.org > > Regards >
2005 Mar 16
1
Re: [Serusers] ser+asterisk - security
Do some reading about contexts in *. Basically, you want all "public" sip requests to land in a dialplan context that has no access to PSTN, and requests from your own SER box(es) to land in another context (that DOES have access to PSTN). You can achieve this by adding an entry to your sip.conf for your SER box with it's IP address (and context) specified. ----- Original
2005 May 29
0
[Serusers] QOS of VoIP
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@iptel.org http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
2005 Jun 27
1
RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk
I don't want to offend you but you should have a look to sems . You won't find docs to help you at asterisk.org --- "lucape@inwind.it" <lucape@inwind.it> a ?crit : > hello > > help me to configure ser + asterisk > how to do the configuration? > > Luca > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > 6X
2006 Feb 03
0
Re: [Serusers] high-availibility setup using f5 bigip
I think that the range of this question is too large. You should tell us what your scenario is. And tell us more about your configurations. 2006/2/2, Jack Wei <cowlemon@yahoo.com>: > hi, > > I'm trying to set up 2 SER and 2 Asterisks boxes using a bigip switch to do > load-balancing. I'm using Asterisk as a voicemail application only and have > successfully
2006 Sep 11
0
[Serusers] MS LCS 2005 / SER / Asterisk Integration
Hi to all, I read http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/MS+LCS+2005+%252F+SER+%252F+Asterisk+Integration Is it possible to use ser as a presence server instead of LCS 2005 ? Harry ___________________________________________________________________________ D?couvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/R?ponses pour partager vos
2007 Aug 23
1
[Serusers] why combine ser with asterisk
Asterisk is an excellent PBX system, and makes a very good endpoint in the SIP chain for all sorts of things -- IVR systems, voicemail applications, automated messages, etc. It has an extremely well-written CDR engine, so many people mesh it with billing applications to produce accurate accounting information. It also is fully aware of the media stream, which means it's capable of cutting
2005 Aug 24
0
Re: [Serusers] SER IP PBX for multiple clients
Waldo, How do you let your customers manage 'their' PBX. I too have a setup like you. However, I installed a * server for each customer, via vserver. I'd like to now what kind of software/webbased package you use for this. I also have SER installed as a front-end server for the * servers. But, as I'm still not very into SER, don't know exactly how this fits in. Should I use
2005 Aug 24
0
Re: [Serusers] SER IP PBX for multiple clients
lqbal, I do plan on having alot of users. Two markets I'm trying to get some volume users from are: residential consumers and business users. Residential consumers should get basic line services such as their own DID, voicemail, caller-id, call-waiting, three-way calling, and basically, all the standard features you get from companies like Vonage, etc. This particular market base
2009 Aug 12
3
Asterisk + CDRTool
Hello Anyone who have already use/configure Asterisk with CDRTool ? Or maybe can suggest another CDR GUI ? regards. Harry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090812/e3e9e675/attachment.htm
2004 Jul 09
0
Asterisk and CDRTool
Does anyone have the CDRTool working well with Asterisk? I have been trying to figure out the tricks to getting pricing to show up when searching on CDR's in the tool. I have searched on Google and the mailing archives, but have not found anything too helpful. If anyone has any insight that would be great! Thanks, dj
2005 Jun 27
0
RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk
Beautiful. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 3:48 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk On Monday 27 June 2005 14:50, harry gaillac wrote: > I don't want to offend you but you