similar to: finding mac addresses

Hello! Attempt to scan a network with any method except plain ping results in an error: truss nmap -sT -p 21 '172.19.17.*' [...] sendto(0x4,0x8094200,0,0x0,{ AF_INET 172.19.17.0:0 },0x10) ERR#49 'Can't assign requested address' [...] What's strange that man on send(2) doesn't state that EADDRNOTAVAIL can ever be returned from sendto(). Quick look at nmap's site

On 10/30/2015 09:01 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>> So I guess the strange IP address probably comes from some Lite-On device >>> somewhere in my house - maybe on the server itself, an HP MicroServer. >>> There are so many possible electronic culprits today. > >> You should be able to use nmap to scan the device. > > Thanks

Hi, I have an interesting problem. I want to be able to verify that my hostname, ipaddress, and mac address are correct in the DNS/DHCP. I have the values, how do I compare. I am able to use NSLOOKUP for the hostname=ip confirmation How do I do the ip addresss = mac address comparison I tried arp and a few other things. Almost everything on google says either to logon to DHCP (which I do

On 11/01/2015 07:40 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > ken wrote: > >> On 10/30/2015 09:01 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>>> So I guess the strange IP address probably comes from some Lite-On >>>>> device somewhere in my house - maybe on the server itself, an HP >>>>> MicroServer. There are so many possible electronic culprits today. >>>>

On 10/28/2015 04:59 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Mark Haney wrote: > >>> On 10/28/2015 9:04 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> >>>> Why does "arp -a" show IP address 169.254.192.123 >>>> on my 192.168.2.0 home network? > >> Sounds like you have a host with a NIC that's configured for DHCP but >> either can't communicate

In CentOS 4 does anyone know the switches to get NMAP to reveal the MAC of the host being scanned ? I cant seem to find it and i am using nmap-4.20 - i am sure this was available somehow on older releases. thanks

I have set up a secondary IP address in the same network as my primary. So eth0: 192.168.100.29 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0:0 192.168.100.45 netmask 255.255.255.0 And indeed when I invoke an apache instance that listens on the secondary IP address/interface it works, and it also makes it outside the LAN since the default gateway is defined in the routing tables for 192.168.100.0/24. But

I'm trying to get Samba up and running and having a terrible time. It says that I should be able to run nmap and see that 137 and 139 are open - which they are not. I have not added any restrictions in smb.conf, do not have a firewall running and I have increased the log level to 5 to see all of the messages. It says that it is talking on 137 but it kind of looks like it's not talking

Is any way to detect changed MAC adresses? Someone taught change MACs peoples in my network and I have problems. E.g. Two computers working on one MAC, and one IP (static ARP and DHCP). WinXP is screaming some message... that two computers or more have the same IP. How can I find out who''s changed MAC?

Using a default xen3.0.1 setup for dom0(rhel4 distro) and domUs (gentoo, rhel4, centos4.2 distros, ttylinux) with the domUs all having dhcp turned on, is there an easy way to tell from within the dom0 what ip addresses were assigned to the domUs after bootup? Toby Ford USi _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

I have a device on my network that is not DHCP and I dont know the IP address of it and it has not method of finding it or changing it unless you know the IP address (setable by browser). Is there a way on linux, based on MAC address, to get the IP of the unit? Thanks, Jerry

Hi guys, I have this configuration: LAN -- LINUX BRIDGE -- LINUX BRIDGE -- TS The linux's bridges are for wifi purposes (2 centos machines) and is working fine. The problem I have is that the TS are 3 windows TS in load balancing configuration. There is 1 IP for general purposes and every TS has its own IP. For example, the configuration is: 192.168.0.1/24 TS1 192.168.0.2/24 TS2

Sounds like you have a host with a NIC that's configured for DHCP but either can't communicate with the DHCP server, or there are no free IPs for the DHCP server to give it. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: > It's a Zero Config IP address. Most likely a host with zero config > enabled, pretty much all Windows by default, was

Am 12.08.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Dr J Austin: > Hi Richard > > I have been working at trying to get cyrus to listen on 148.197.29.5 > interface instead of the localhost - I have failed > > Whenever I add things to /etc/cyrus.conf such as > imaps cmd="imapd -s" listen="[148.197.29.5]:imaps" prefork=1 No square brackets around the ip address. >

Hi, this is propably bridge related and not really a xen problem, but it might help someone: Some of our domUs are not able to arp. Arp -n show (incomplete), and doing a tcpdump shows, that on the dom0''s eth0 the arp request goes out, the response comes in, but on the vifX.0 interface the arp response is gone. dom0# tcpdump -ni eth0 arp who-has 10.32.2.51 tell 10.32.7.70 arp reply

Hello, all. When I execute arp -a -n, there are lots of arp caches like below. Surely, I set netmask and Broadcast without problem and routing table also no problem. System is CentOS release 4.7 i386. I know how to delete the arp cache, but I don't know why .. # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:D1:E7:91:CC inet addr:192.168.195.36

Hi, I''ve installed xen 3.0.3 from packages (xen-linux-system) on a debian etch, and i''ve configured it with network-bridge script in the default way (netdev=eth0, bridge=xenbr0, etc...) which is ok for me. the problem I have: I cannot ping any outer machine from dom0 (nor any outer machine can ping me). It gives me a "Destination Host Unreachable" message that

Hello, You may recall some of My Dmz question around Thanksgiving. While I have configured a Proxy arp Dmz. I would like to practice with the routed setup you suggested Tom as your network was simular. Here is one of your quotes "The configuration of eth2 is largely irrelevant but you certainly don''t want to confuse things by assigning any default gateway out of that

hi all, i got flooded by these msgs like 1000+ lines, any idea? my kernel is dated Nov-30 FreeBSD 4.9-stable # tail -f /var/log/messages Jan 18 19:43:23 xb /kernel: arp: 202.79.180.1 moved from 00:04:5a:49:eb:74 to 00:50:0f:4f:c0:00 on rl0 Jan 18 19:45:06 xb /kernel: arp: 202.79.180.1 moved from 00:50:0f:4f:c0:00 to 00:04:5a:49:eb:74 on rl0 Jan 18 19:45:18 xb /kernel: arp: 202.79.180.1 moved from

----- Forwarded message from John <strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com> ----- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:58:15 -0600 From: John <strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: interface bonding User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Is there any way to bond sniffer interfaces? I've read a little on netgraph and it seems like i maybe able to use that but i'm not sure how to go