similar to: Sangoma driver update?

Hi folks I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here. Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some technical reservations with htat patch. It seems that under certain circumstances it may cause exexpected behaviour when used with other Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't

Hi folks I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here. Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some technical reservations with that patch. It seems that under certain circumstances it may cause unexpected behavior when used with other Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't

Today, sessions 320-321 of the VoIP Users Conference will take place at the usual time, 12 Noon Eastern [ http://vuc.me/next for local times ] We'll be talking to Sangoma's Frederic Dickey about NetBorder 4.0. You can download or watch his accompanying slide presentation here: http://vuc.li/Sangoma-2011 Next, Pascal Dor?, mVoIP chief over at Media5 Corporation will talk about the

Hi, Recommending to go Digium because of an OpenBSD issue with the Sangoma A104D is quite funny to say the least since neither is the TE407P supported in BSD by Digium. So the recommendation is useless to the person who originally requested for a comparison between the two products. If someone wanted to send back the A104D, he could have taken advantage of Sangoma's 30 day money back

Hi, folks! Sangoma has an informal user survey up on their home page (at http://www.sangoma.com) asking if people would use their A500 card for North American BRI, if it were supported. I encourage anyone with an interest in voice BRI in North America to vote; this information will be used for deciding whether to make the investment in developing a National ISDN driver layer for it. Benefits to

Does anyone know if the Sangoma A101 supports DS4 and/or RBS ! Shame on me for not knowing the answer, but I don't, and I can't find any mention of it on Sangoma's website. Cory Andrews Purchasing Manager ++++++++++++++++++ VOIPSupply.com A Division of b2 Technologies 454 Sonwil Drive Buffalo, NY 14225 ++++++++++++++++++++ direct - 716.250.3402 mobile - 716.907.4054 email -

Saw an ad in the latest Linux Journal for Sangoma's FXO/FXS analog cards. it was part of an ad for a reseller. I can't find anything on the resellers site or Sangoma's site either. Did the ad jump the gun or someting? Is this for real? Paul -- Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC paul@dugas.cc phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park

Hi, I migrated from asterisk 1.6 to 11.3. The Server has a Sangoma A104 quadPri card installed. OS is a fresh installed Ubuntu 12.04 64bit libpri, dahdi etc. all latest releases.. Sangoma says... driver is compatible with ANY asterisk version... I tried driver 3.5.8... Setup ended with error. I tried (latest) driver 7.0.1 Setup went through, Asterisk is showing dahdi channels... all fine....

I'm trying to get my Sangoma B600 working with Asterisk 1.6.1 and DAHDI 2.2. I've tried running ./Setup dahdi (and with --64-bit_4GB flag, running amd64) and the compile fails with this for many versions of the driver (incl. 3.3.16, 3.3.16.22, and 3.4.1): Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 1 modules CC /usr/src/wanpipe-3.3.16/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.mod.o LD [M]

Hi, using Sangoma drivers: - doing 'lsmod', I see: zaptel ... wanpipe,wctdm24xxp,wctdm,wcfxo,wcte11xp,wct1xxp,wct4xxp,tor2 I'd like to avoid loading all these modules. What have I to do? - do I need to have 'zaptel' startup script under /etc/init.d ? Thanks -- Domenico Viggiani

Hi again, Well - I didn't see beta8a-2.3.3 in custom dir. Will try. Also I tried to contact Sangoma - they are very fast to answer but main problem is time difference - it's 6 hours between Canada and Europe. Br, dmitry Dmitry Zhukovski System developer ComX Networks A/S Naverland 31, 2 DK-2600 Glostrup Denmark Phone: +45 70 25 74 74 Fax:???? +45 70 25 73 74 Web: www.comx.dk

Hello, Several people asked to get a hold of the stats I used to determine that the Sangoma T1/E1 boards performed better in our real-world tests than the Digium boards. We've decided to post our results after confirming them over the past month of operations. Here is a link to the last two reviews I wrote about Sangoma with Asterisk:

Hi, Does anybody have an idea as to why dahdi_test results drop to unacceptable levels after doing a wanrouter stop/start using a Sangoma card? See below that it drops from 99.99% to 98.55%: [root at bin]# dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... 99.999512% 99.992874% --- Results after 2 passes --- Best: 100.000 -- Worst: 99.993 -- Average: 99.996193, Difference:

Hello, Have you tried the wanpipe-beta8c-2.3.3.tgz release in the custom/2.3.3 dir on their FTP site? Also, have you contacted Sangoma for support? They are very responsive. I am using wanpipe-beta8a-2.3.3.tgz and it's been working great on my A104 for a week now. MATT--- -----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Zhukovski [mailto:DZH@comx.dk] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 5:20 AM To: Asterisk

Hello All, I saw an add in my latest Linux Journal advertising Sangoma's new "AA series" of FXO/FXS analog cards with on-board echo cancellation, but I can't find any information at all on them. Even the link given in the advertisement is a dead end as far as I can tell. Anybody else seen/heard anything about this? -Seth

My Sangoma Experience in Asterisk: Followup 2005-05-06 original review can be found at: http://astguiclient.sourceforge.net/Sangoma_experience.txt It's now been a month since I finished my last round of tests with the Sangoma A104u board in Asterisk. I have had a lot of conversations with the guys at Sangoma about how my system runs so that they could set up their test systems to try to

Ok, I have tested with almost all versions both in 2.3.2--*-stable and 2.3.3-*-beta - I am getting same messages: May 9 10:55:26 WARNING[3961]: chan_zap.c:1925 pri_find_dchan: No D-channels available! Using Primary on channel anyway 16! and same Down state pb01*CLI> pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 16 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: EuroISDN Type: CPE Window Length: 0/7

Hi all, My problem boils down to these errors: ... Unable to create channel of type 'ZAP' (cause 34 - Circuit/channel congestion) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time This is triggered by lines in extentions.conf such as: exten => _X.,1,Dial(ZAP/g1/${EXTEN},,W) The system is CentOS v5.2 with Asterisk 1.4.23 (druid-asterisk-1.4.23.1-2), a Sangoma A104

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! I had the opportunity to test a Sangoma A200 card and I have some doubts that I would like to consult: I tried to detect the card and I had no success using the wctdm module with DAHDI. I guess this is because electronics is different because the TDM400P and OpenVox A400P cards have separate modules for each channel, while the Sangoma A200

Hello, i am trying to install sangoma a200d to my centOS server but i am receivig this error message: ZT_CHANCONFIG falied on channel 1: invalid argument (22) Please help me on hopw to solve this issue! tnx! kenjie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060309/fbeeb280/attachment.htm